Sentences with phrase «many luxury players»

«Its features show how Audi's attention to detail elevates this vehicle from a standard SUV to a luxury player.»

There is also the fundamental problem with mass - market retailing in general right now, which is that players like Target are being squeezed by even leaner players like dollar stores from the bottom and luxury players at the high end.

Can Tesla make the shift away from being just a luxury player to a mass - market carmaker at scale?

He is a luxury player and IMO we need to keep that in mind.

Finally, Ozil recently has been at best been described as a flat track bully due to his evident ability to impose himself on the «lesser» teams but at worst he is described as lazy and a luxury player that has no place in the team against the «bigger» teams.

Fabregas is a luxury player and doesn't have a place in todays game at the to level.

With the likes of Coquelin, Xhaka, Elneny and hopefully Cazorla competing for those midfield spots you could say that the always attack minded Welshman is a bit of a luxury player whose impact off the bench could be more than from the start, don't you think?

Any draft picks that are spent on «luxury players» when we have significant holes at other positions on the roster, are wasted draft picks in my opinion.

Having options wont be a problem, but I do nt think we should get too many luxury players, so surely a top ST is up next?

Rues is more a luxury player and would cause problems in the dressing room as sant, roiscky, podolski, chamberlain, Campbell may struggle for game time.

Manchester United midfielder Juan Mata, 27, says he is happy to be labelled a «luxury player» if it means scoring goals and making assists, The Times reports.

We have the likes of The Ox, Walcott, Ramsey, Wilshere etc, we don't need another luxury player when we have pressing issues in the squad.

If he doesn't show such attributes by next season, he may just be a luxury player.

So maybe Walcott is a bit of a luxury player, with his pace, movement and finishing from wide areas, mainly the right.

Add to this that Ozil is also joint top of the EPL assist chart with David Silva after bagging another couple as we beat Watford, and you can see that rather than being a luxury player, the Germany international is now a vital and influential member of the team.

He is a luxury player and at times it has pained us to have a player like that when the team wasn't set up for it (Wenger fault, he picks tactics).

We all know ozil is a luxury player.

Ozil is a luxury player we never really planned for.

Player ratings GK - 5 not much to do looked a bit shaky on crosses Bel - 6 got forward but poor crossing Mon - 7 did ok but impact for the goal Gaby - 7 defended well looked solid Kos - 6 did ok Coq - 6 ok defensively but poor distribution Xhaka - 6 did ok at times but very average player Gibbs - 6 wing back looks to suit his ability but would like more from him Walcott - 5 looked average and positive enough in possession Ozil -4 poor in possession and none existent without the ball, luxury player Sanchez 5 worst game I've seen him have and embarrassed the team by going down after the ball hit him although the Leicester player deserved a ref

The accusation that Mesut Ozil is a bit of a luxury player for Arsenal has been heard ever since the German signed for the Gunners over two years ago and there has been evidence to back up the claim.

I used to watch him for Madrid and he was just a luxury player for them, played him for 60 minutes a game and sometimes he would start from the bench..

Only then can be dream of luxury players.

We refused to bid more than # 40 million plus # 1 for a monster like Suarez but then panic into paying # 42 million for luxury player..

Ozil is what I consider a luxury player, someone who can add a bit extra now and again.

He looks to be far too much of a luxury player, and if you're not going to contribute defensively then you have to be scoring and assisting with regularity.

We can't afford to play 4 lightweight luxury players up front away from home where teams are going to contest the midfield.

Right now he is just a luxury player.

Ozil is a luxury player for a luxury team.

I don't think he and Ozil should play together and Cazorla is too good to sit on the bench and to be honest him Podolski are luxury players who are being used wrong.

To me that showed that Ozil was a luxury player and Madrid were desperate to get rid, they thought Di Maria would leave instead of Ozil but Di Maria refused to be pushed out.

I was wrong... He's a passenger, a «luxury player.»

Ozil is a pure playmaker more than any of them, but when you don't have talent in every position he starts to look like a luxury player.

Ozil is a luxury player, he is great if you have a dominating midfield and back 4, he turns into a liability when we play a stronger team who dominate midfield.

Ozil is a great luxury player, but sadly Arsenal don't deserve him and can't afford to play him considering the current state of the club.

As see it Ozil is a luxury player player who you either accept his weaknesses (not defending, can't / won't tackle, etc) and put a couple of defensive midfielders behind him or you should not play him.

Like everyone has said before on this forum, he's a luxury player, because a team will need to accommodate for a player like Ozil and Arsenal do not have the financial muscle or players to do that.

I still can't believe we were going for Suarez and only offered # 40 million + # 1 we refused to go any higher on that amount, but then we forked out # 42 million on a luxury player we still don't need to this day.

He is a luxury player who is not 100 percent dedicated.

The problem with having Ozil is that he is a luxury player, if you want the best out of him you need to build a team around him.

As others have mentioned before, the biggest clubs already have significant depth in forward positions, and are, hypothetically, less inclined to splurge on a luxury player at this point in time.

Yes he is the best finisher in the EPL, and the sub bench has taken away his enthusiasm, i feel his skill set is more suited as a secondary striker who plays behind the main man, however Podolski lacks the defensive discipline to play in the arsenal system and arsenal truly can not afford luxury players, especially when arsenal as a poor defensive attitude.

Because he doesn't have defensive side of game, he's a luxury player, that not all teams can tolerate.

«They need a return to when their team was a combination of luxury players, old pros and youngsters.

Big Sam and his style of football management is just about as different from Arsene Wenger as you can get and so the type of players that fit in well with the Arsenal style might well be seen as too lightweight by the new England boss or as luxury players rather than regulars.

Ozil is a luxury player who very rarely turns up for Arsenal when he's most needed.The rest of the team has to be on song in order for him to make any impression.Which judging from the previous Season is only likely to happen on a handful of occasions.

Having said that, I am beginning to think he might be a luxury player.

We should probably steer away from luxury players for a while.

Ozil is not a luxury player as a luxury player is just excess to your needs.

Luxury players aren't vital to a team.

I will say it again, Mesut is a luxury player, if the team performs bad, he will be lost, if the team plays good, he is going to make them excelent.