Sentences with phrase «many omnipotent beings»

«how was it a sacrifice at all when an omnipotent being could just pop up a replacement son» = > Jesus the man actually endured it, God himself endured it, the Holy Spirit cried out.

I pray to whichever holy name (God, Allah, Jehovah, Krishna, Jesus, etc.) suits the ONE Omniscient, Omnipresent, Omnipotent being that ignorance is wiped away from our species and we become a closer, more loving, peaceful creature and that we realize how much time we waste and how much further we push our fellow neighbor and brother under God, regardless of creed, away debating over who's God is better and discover the error of our ways before we destroy each other... before it's too late, because The End is Nigh!!!!! LOL!!!!! Really though, isn't the world full of enough tragedy, and aren't their so many more important things that need our energy and attention like the innocent children in Pakistan dying from diseases from the flood or the homeless children in our own country, or the lack of education, which is exactly what leads to this kind of debate?

Your other mistake here is that you see the essential strangess of the problem but believe that an omnipotent being floating in a void solves the issue of strangeness.

People who believe are weak minded and can not accept the fact there is not reason for anything, no loving omnipotent being who cares or anything after death.

This is a supposed omnipotent being, this Christian god.

Jeff, apart from your sneaky attempt to claim proof where you have none, consider this: How is it again that your omnipotent being couldn't do his saving bit without the whole silly Jesus hoopla?

That's laughable too, but he is correct in claiming that science has no real answers as to why we're here or why every culture in history has had a belief in a mysterious, unseen, omnipotent being.

Now... if you'd like to discuss the nature of an omnipotent being who finds it necessary to coerce bows out of his own creations, and whether or not such a being deserves to be worshipped by anyone or anything, we can certainly discuss that.

The proprietor of the shop obviously has the right to offer this type of discount, but it's sad that in this backwards, demon - haunted country we're still treating a work of fiction supposedly handed down by an magical, omnipotent being as a framework for a moral life, rather than embracing an objective, secular view of morality.

Ask yourself how that your omnipotent being couldn't do his saving bit without the whole silly Jesus hoopla.

If this were not the case, then Satan would have the powers of an independent omnipotent being, something Christian doctrine doesn't allow.

AND it would require that magical particles always existed in order to create the big bang... so basically, you come to us saying, we're stupid for Believing in God, an omnipotent being that Created the Universe and do so by saying the true answer is you should believe in Magical (Always existing) particles that randomly created everything by... exploding.......

Also, to a believer God (a basically omnipotent being) is not making anyone follow him no matter what even though that being commands to follow, there is no actual obligation to follow.

You may say «Free will» but that's just a concept, one that any omnipotent being should be able work around without violating.

fred, Any idea how an omniscient omnipotent being that created the 100's of billions of galaxies, ours with 100's of billions of star systems, provided his word to so few humans over the last few millennia?

They believe that they are acting in the interest of an omniscient, omnipotent being that they love.

I am open to the possibility of their being an omnipotent super being (if for no other reason than because I can't prove there isn't one) however, if one were to present him or herself to me I think I'd have a hard time respecting this omnipotent being that has had the power to prevent wars, protect the innocent, and create a better life for all, but chooses not to.

Somehow the omnipotent being that created the universe and all its potential life forms is male, often has a big full beard, and behaves like a human father.

Sheila,... but as an omnipotent being, he inflicted all this harm on us, his creations.

This brings us then to the real point of disagreement between Plantinga and Griffin: the question of whether every actual world must necessarily contain self - determining entities and hence whether an omnipotent being can unilaterally bring about any world devoid of genuine evil.

you can imagine tribal leader using the logic of the bible... but not a omnipotent being.

How many of us have been an omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent being?

An omnipotent ruler probably wouldn't need to kill a whole bunch of infants to try (unsuccessfully) to make a point to some human ruler — but maybe he's just a sick and twist omnipotent being...

How is it that your omnipotent being couldn't do his saving bit without the whole silly Jesus hoopla?

That «Shaddai» was originally thought to be omnipotent is extremely improbable.

Unless he wants us to believe he is an omnipotent being.

It is human arrogance at its finest to believe an omnipotent being has some stock in the outcome of the number of times a ball is on either side of a field.

My own prayers have lead to a complete metdown of my job, career and personal life, I became almost psychotic and deranged through prayer I had so many people against me I felt my own strength and saness is inate and not through an omnipotent being.

But given that no one has been proven to have returned, it's fair to conclude that there is no heaven or hell or omnipotent beings (note that believing something doesn't make it so).

You see, there's two arguments here — the universe abides by natural laws and rules and is governed by relations, or the universe abides by natural laws and rules and is governed by relations which were created by an omnipotent being.

I've known hundreds of conservative christians, and none of them would describe the traditional, conservative hermeneutic as being that God's behavior was «just like Hitler» but since he's omnipotent it's ok to be like Hitler.

God is an omnipotent being that transcends gender or race.

If you have on omnipotent being always watching who controls your fate, you are far less inclined to murder indiscriminately.

Or if you have an ALLEGED omnipotent being MADE UP by power - hungry politicians or tribe leaders (whatever you call them), then this too would instill more fear into the masses and achieve the result you are defending.

For a supposedly omniscient, omnipotent being, the god of the bible certainly fails to be either.

Furthermore, it is also ludicrous that an omnipotent being needs «glory» and worship like you are claiming.

Quantum physics deals with particles and waves, not sentient, omnipotent beings.

How is it that your supposedly omnipotent being couldn't do his saving bit without the whole silly Jesus hoopla?

There is nothing to suggest an omnipotent being who snapped his / her / its finger and created the universe.

First, regarding Vic's standard post about his «Jesus that he keeps spamming us with, how is it, Vic, that your omnipotent being couldn't do his saving bit without the whole silly Jesus hoopla?

The proponent of «I» omnipotence... maintains that «an omnipotent being can unilaterally affect any state of affairs, if that state of affairs is intrinsically possible...» (GPE 270).

This is why science investigates the natural world as if there were no omnipotent being controlling it - after all, if there were, then literally anything is possible, and then what would be the point of scientific investigation?

What would a day be in the Divine circadian cycle of an omnimodal, omnipotent being, 24 hours, 24 billion years, 24 milliseconds??? Nowhere in the Bible coes it say that evolution does not exist within the living realm, but Simon Peter does say that to the I Am»... one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years is as one day...» (the Bible DOES recognize the effects of animal husbandry, which is a form of artificially - induced evolution on livestock species, and narrates accounts of Divine intervention to influence it, so you can not factually say that it is outside the realm of Divine probability by biblical accounts, as Divine probability contains, by textbook definition, the sum of the laws of nature.

not much of an Omnipotent being is he.

How is it possible that an omnipotent being is so limited in its omnipotence that it can't possible take other forms or be called by other names or be worshiped or reached in other ways.

Ann: well said.1 word — if our «creator» wanted wise men to know of him, he'd sit his omnipotent a s s down in my office right now and tell me he exists.

How is it that your omnipotent being, this Christian «god» of yours, couldn't do his saving bit without the whole silly Jesus hoopla?

I point out that an omnipotent being could smite me at any time and does not need to wait until I am vulnerable and that a benevolent being would not kill a few hundred just to get at me, but it doesn't seem to help.

I always think it funny when people puts limits on a omnipotent being.

Christ appears as an omnipotent being, executing God's judgment, in himself the supernatural intervention of God in history.