The duo debunks the theory of politicians and
other alarmists that playing video games leads to teen violence by handing over a real semiautomatic weapon to a nine - year - old video game player to see if he becomes a human killing machine.
I have extensively read scientist Mike Hulme's presentation of climate change as PNS, but do you know of
any other alarmist or sceptic scientists calling it as PNS?
Hansen, Schneider and
other alarmists say we must drastically reduce GHG emissions, because we did nothing to tackle climate change in the past (1988 - 2008), due to American sabotage.
According to the dubious theories and predictions advanced by Al Gore and
other alarmists, though, none of this should be happening.
So NASA and
other alarmists falsely extrapolate from their manipulated urban data to fill in massive gaps for the other 95 % of the Earth.
Petra December 10, 2012 at 7:22 am said:» I always suspected Stefan and Murh weren't real people, just inventions of you or one of
the other alarmist truebelievers»
Most of
the other alarmists are responsible commentators but Luke's arguments are rarely scientific most frequently rude and he resorts to Ad Homs on almost every occasion he posts a comment.
I always suspected Stefan and Murh weren't real people, just inventions of you or one of
the other alarmist truebelievers, who you make spout a lot of drivel, as you try and discredit we sinners guilty of climate blasphemy.
The UK's
other alarmist newspaper, The Independent, repeated a claim from alarmist reinsurance firm, Munich Re, that 2010 had been an ««exceptional year» for weather disasters».
Funny, I don't recall Joshua, Web or any of
the other alarmist crackpots on this site ever complaining about it.
It's game over Mosher, Willard, Jimmy D And
the other alarmists.
You can be the biggest, most risible assclown in the history of junk statistics and pseudoscience but so long as you can somehow cobble together a half - way plausible paper, no matter how inept your methodology, which helps prop up the vast man - made global warming industry then you have it made: the President of the USA will Tweet you; your University will back you to the hilt; your colleagues will rally round you; you will get a very favourable write - up in the Guardian (and myriad
other alarmist publications); your critics will be sidelined and ignored.
Hopefully the majority of scientists will at some point also realise that by their silence, they endorse Climategate and the various
other alarmist frauds.
Along with the sheer unpleasantness of the moderators at Real Climate and
other alarmist blogs, the Guardian's practice of summarily banning anyone who does not follow exactly the party line as laid down by the Klimatariat has driven more people to become sceptics than any deep study of the science ever has.
Like
other alarmists in the climate debate, Brown is satisfied with repeating the sound bites and self - serving pseudoscience of those at the extreme end of the scientific debate, and dismisses the extensive research that contradicts that view.
«To Gavin [Schmidt] and
the other alarmists, it appears, a piece that is fair and balanced can make no mention of any other opinion except that carbon dioxide is causing global warming and action is needed now and will deliver gain and no pain, something the one sided media coverage has gotten them used to over the years,» D'Aleo wrote on January 13, 2009.
If Hansen and many
other alarmists were correct, then logically the Earth's climate should have become as inhospitable as that of Venus hundreds of millions of years ago.
What
other alarmist predictions, exaggerated claims and catastrophic projections are you fed in order to push the global warming agenda?
Do you believe that IPCC, UN, and
other alarmist bodies are really interested in CO2 emissions per se?
It seems that the Obama administration, which has increasingly turned to unconstitutional «climate» edicts and decrees as the UN's global warming theories crumble, agrees with Figures and
other alarmists about the Chinese model.
Villabolo's invective is routine — and even actively encouraged — at blogs like climate progress, RealClimate, and most
other alarmist blogs — while polite and courteous comments with a different opinion are routinely deleted.
Not exact matches
Recently though, I've noticed a wave of worriers, let's call them gluten
alarmists, who won't touch traditional bread, pasta or
other foods containing gluten with a 10 - foot pole — in public, anyway.
Switched doctors, to one who is supportive of breastfeeding, uses the WHO charts for exclusively breastfed babies, and he agreed that the
other doctor was being overly
alarmist in trying to push formula on my baby.
The FDA issued a ban on the use of BPA in baby bottles in 2012, however,
alarmists are claiming that
other chemicals in plastic are just as harmful as BPA, but there is no scientific evidence to back this up.
Scientists and
others who hope to inform the public or spur action have long struggled with how to convey the high stakes of global warming without making people feel helpless or fueling deniers by coming across as
alarmist.
I didn't presume that Sir Nicholas spoke with any
other authority, and I certainly didn't endorse his
alarmist conclusion, presented as a certainty, that under «business - as - usual... we can see that we are headed for some pretty unpleasant increases of temperature [of 4 or 5ºC].»
There are
other examples of models being too conservative, rather than
alarmist as some portray them.
Favreau is a little too
alarmist about Internet trolls and critics, and it takes too long for the movie's plot to kick in, but otherwise this is a charming and well - acted film, with strong supporting turns by John Leguizamo, Dustin Hoffman and Scarlett Johansson, among
others.
We have even had numerous inspections cancel after the agent talked
others into using their inspector misrepresenting our company saying «we damaged things on inspections» or «he's a deal killer», «an
alarmist»..
I didn't presume that Sir Nicholas spoke with any
other authority, and I certainly didn't endorse his
alarmist conclusion, presented as a certainty, that under «business - as - usual... we can see that we are headed for some pretty unpleasant increases of temperature [of 4 or 5ºC].»
Then it ends by quoting Winston Churchill in a way that's meant to group the furthest - out global - warming
alarmist with the likes of RC and
other responsible scientists: «A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.»
By the way, if you guys really believe that, as an expert told you, «newspapers essentially never use op ed space for op eds directly rebutting
other op eds,» then maybe it'd be better to offer to engage the denialists» larger themes anyway: their junk science, their tarring of you all as «
alarmists,» their idea that what's genuinely alarming is really only the concoction of a «science - journalism complex.»
I'm trying to think like an
alarmist: since GW is happening, then all its supposed effects have to be shown as well, or not due to
other factors.
If the public found out what he and
others like him really want, the backlash would put the
alarmists out of business.
We need to not be
alarmist about the potential of this alarm, but realize that it is something to be alarmed about if we let this «little» global warming thing go too far... on top of the
other reasonably alarming things that are already going on, such as hitting thermal limits for crops, etc..
Significantly, the first was under Clinton (read Gore) and the
other two under Obama, which makes them all
alarmist fantasies.
But I'm glad to teach you again, because
others will see that Maxwell agrees with me, and does not deny the 2nd Law like you and your fellow climate
alarmists do when you claim that the cold atmosphere transfers more thermal energy / heat to the earth's surface than the Sun does.
In spite of his rather mild (in comparison to many sceptics» claims) position, Lomborg was the subject of more vitriol from the
alarmist propaganda machine than perhaps any
other climate - sceptic / denier / realist figure.
Even as many promoting the global - warming theory have moderated their language in the interest of restoring credibility,
others on the same side of the table have actually employed more
alarmist language, as if to compensate for the lack of climatic temperature increase by turning up the verbal heat.
Anthony, after everything uncovered in the CRU tape letters and
other documents and speaches given by the ACGW
alarmists, do you really feel it's pure incompetence vs. malfeasance?
Scientists and
others being labeled as «deniers» or «
alarmist» is a clue that this is not a normal environment for science.
Here is what I actually said: ``... the climate
alarmists maintain that Africa is already experiencing natural disasters — principally floods, droughts, malaria and
other diseases, arising from unnatural global warming, and that these are causing increases in poverty, malnutrition, disease and environmental damage.
Contrary to
alarmist predictions, there have been no outbreaks of malaria or
other climate - related diseases on the African subcontinent that could be attributed to global warming.
Tipping his hat to
other scientists who've been attempting to inject a less
alarmist tone into public discussions since the early 1990s, Carter remarked:
Like Sixties rockers, climate
alarmists seem comfortable with women as adoring groupies, but don't appear to have much use for them in any
other capacity.
Other eminent scientists have recognized that these climate
alarmist aren't doing science, they're doing religion, cult religion:
Your and all your
other fellow climate
alarmists provide evidence that these observations of eminent scientists is correct, because none of you can cite any peer reviewed science that empirically falsifies the null climate hypothesis of natural variability still being the primary cause of climate change, or cite any peer reviewed science that empirically shows that anthropogenic CO2 has been the primary cause of the late 20th century climate warming.
Climategate taught me not to read
other people's mail, even in the workplace, and that some skeptics, having learned from
alarmists, are themselves grown too fond of a gotcha.
In Spain, every renewable energy job the government's climate
alarmist policies created was offset by two jobs lost in
other sectors of the economy that were punished by soaring electricity prices.
Now I am sure there are
other less well informed individuals that would throw around absolute values without including a range of uncertainty or even include an over confident range of uncertainty that might be proven inaccurate, but we would never fall in that «
alarmist» camp would we?