Sentences with phrase «many points against»

The best explanation is it's trying to score crass political points against the NDP.

Her main points against it:

The fact that the bankruptcy judge does not recognize this is an important point against them.

While oil prices are currently at a six - and - a-half-year low, Kazakhstan is also feeling the pinch from the tumbling Russian ruble, which has reached its lowest point against the dollar in six months.

I agree with your points against muni's and corporate bonds for ladders though — in terms of expense and risk, which is why I avoid them.

If you read this, I forgot to mention leverage in the above video as well which is another massive negative point against Forex.

Here is an important detail: The starting point against which those gains will be measured isn't the fund's actual net asset value on March 31, but rather the deeply discounted price the new buyers are paying..

But not a word against the meanest of David's cartoons pointed against a huge segment of the Church and its leaders.

However, You hve not posted a single valid point against the fact that religion does have value.

This is taken to be a point against teleology by some and against modern science by others.

I believe you could probably make some good points against what you think are my faults.

I think they often do this to score quick points against the other side by using emotive language.

I do not find that Cobb has met Christian's objections at all adequately, and I count this failure my first point against the Hartshorne - Cobb assumption that there can be a sharing of standpoints.

Part of Levenson's book appeared as an article in this journal; Collins appears to hold that as an additional point against it.

(Please note that in no way am I condoning executing children; I am simply using this as a case - in - point against legalism.

In what follows I will not attempt to answer his arguments in detail, still less to score points against him; the matters we are concerned with are too difficult and too crucial to admit of such treatment; I shall therefore merely try to indicate where and why I still venture to differ from him.

Midgley is not hostile to religion and scores points against scientists and others who think that theology has not changed since the condemnation of Galileo.

Poor little Chad can't answer points against his complete Straw Man arguments against evolutionary theory.

This was a crucial point against Arius» long - running and widespread heresy, that Christ was not the same.

Note that the origins of the Golden Rule pre-date Christianity by many centuries, and many of the behavior dictates of the bible such as casting out of various folk, as well as Christian god's apparent own extreme cruelty such as wiping out whole civilizations point against it.

Another point against atheism, that is self centered, self absorbed, totally out for themselves at the expense of anyone / everyone... Yet, you continue on with your audacity to bash Jesus» truth.

There's nothing offensive or against the rules in my comment, but it is strongly critical, and I would like to think, well argued point against Biblical religions.

While Carl E. Olson needs to rethink a few details in his revisionist account of the history of dispensationalist thought» including the role of Fuller Seminary» he does score some interesting points against the movement's popularizers.

this blog is not working with me... I'll have to catch you guys on another post... it will not accept long post... This is my main point against the scientific method argument; it is consensus in the scientific community that most of our Universe is unseen.

Just so you know when I wrote «interesting» above I genuinely was interested in having a talk with you, there was no intention of malice or mischief or scoring points against you.

We're just trying to make it through the heat at this point against all of the amazing teams from the South.

Try flipping the argument and ask why so called top teams drop so many points against the bottom 6 clubs?

I would rather have us win the so called lessee teams home and away and drop a few points against the bigger boys.

There's no indication we are good enough to pick up max points against Swansea, Watford, and Burnley.

We also managed 4 out of 6 points against them in the league.

Cincinnati's Bearcats tagged the same teams 77 - 63 and 84 - 69, with Jim Ard scoring 31 points against the Tigers and adding 21 more against the Eagles.

The three points against the Merseyside outfit ensured that Mourinho's men maintained their seven point lead over Manchester City at the top of the table.

Arsenal supporters will have been overjoyed to secure all three points against rivals Tottenham on Sunday, but Alan Shearer makes a great point.

And the other 2 co-leaders dropped points against teams we've beaten: Tottenham drew at Burnley: we won there (with the ugliest goal ever... but we won) City drew at home to Southampton: we won our home game against Southampton

Misfiring L'pool will drop points against smaller teams, we need to win ours and we can fight for top 4 (4th spot)

Just perusing last years fixtures and discounting the losses to Chelsea and Manure Arsenal dropped roughly 10 points against the likes of Southampton, Swansea (lost 2x), Stoke, Sunderland, Leicester, Hull City, Liverpool (96 minute Skyrtel equalizer playing a man down).

James Franklin needs a way to keep his team motivated heading into the offseason — especially losing some big - time contributors to the NFL — and he'll look to make a point against the Huskies.

How are we going to get any points against Chelski, City, United etc?

Arsene Wenger was obviously not happy that Arsenal dropped three points against one of our direct rivals for fourth place, but although he rued the defensive «mistakes» he felt that his team were tired but refused to blame anyone for the calamitous two goals we conceded.

The three points against Liverpool are massively important but not worth risking Sanchez's season over.

Can't afford to lose points against «weaker» opponents because we have the big boys coming up in November.

Wipe the floor with them tonight (3 - 0) A couple of decent new signings 3 points against Leicester Good week

Their head coach, aka the offensive genius who couldn't figure out how to score a single point against the Titans in the 2nd half.

Well we played bad, but at the end of the day we took a vital point against one of the title rivals at their home..

I concede that the Premier league is the most competive professional league in world football and every team loses a game or two they shouldnt (especially on the road) but unfortunately when you only able to secure 7 out of 24 available points against Manure / Shitty / Spuds / Cheshit you CANT drop points in such fixtures.

Ramsey must learn from that and Giroud needs to be sharper for the next game but to be fair Ramsey and Giroud scored against City plus Giroud popped up in am important position to provide Ramsey with a tap in for 3 points against Palace.

In this sense, history dictates that Real will have more than a tough time taking the three points against their stubborn opponents and no doubt Simeone will have a plan up his sleeve.

May sound perverse but I think a more evenly matched top 5 will offer us a better chance of at least still being in the mix later in the season — no one team likely to dominate and walk away with it and all dropping a few points against each other.

Only 4 * in those games I know we also drew Lester but that was the real killer we were scraped to salvage a point against Everton that was gained not lost and if we play like this against the top 4 I'm not too worried about us

As others have said 3 points against Huddersfield is as important as any other win.