Sentences with phrase «many readers of your review»

I encourage the readers of this review to support the author of the original work by purchasing the book.

Readers of this review probably know by now that Marsh treats the friendship as a de facto love affair, at least from Bonhoeffer's side.

What, after all, does the reader of the review want to know about a work of reference?

Kathe Kruse is also offering a coupon code for the readers of this review!

How many readers of your review of Falling to Earth: An Apollo 15 astronaut's journey to the moon (30 July,...

And this, good readers of this review, encompasses both of the biggest gripes I have for Ironclad — Lady Isabel and the siege of the Rochester castle itself.

Lauren says, «I've always been an avid reader of reviews — not just books, but films and TV as well.

And no need to describe what impact that relationship may have on the review, let the reader of the review decide that (as I was just saying to Jan above).

I suggest your default position is to let the reader of the review decide for him or herself whether or not to pay attention to the review.

I'm a big reader of reviews but have never written many (okay... almost none) but this experience has inspired me to take the time so others can use it to help in their decision making process.

With that being said, here are several ways to reduce and possibly avoid confirmation bias as a reviewer and as a reader of reviews.

To the more hirsute readers of this review, that might not seem like a revolutionary sort thing.

As longtime readers of my Review Panel Notes might have decoded, the pools of dark highlighting mark the negative comments.

Not exact matches

Because both the reviewer and the review - reader's information will be available online, reviews of the future will be personally tailored to each reader.

«Joi and Jeff use nine principals and creative storytelling to take readers on a detailed review of innovation and change.

Beyond Reisman's ambition to offer «the best reading application» anywhere (and early reviews of the software have been favourable), the Kobo experience caters to a reader who is stealing moments throughout their busy day in which to read, on whatever device they happen to have at hand.

It does this by getting a bunch of readers to give the book good reviews.

If you have the capability, I would simply suggest reviewing your analytics data for referral information and just keep tabs that way (a previous post on Evaluating Link Results has a great comment from one of the readers regarding this — check out his idea for certain).

Q1 review of my Vrijheid Fonds2018 Dear readers, fellow DGI's, The first quarter of 2018 is already behind us.

Readers should not place undue reliance on any forward - looking statements and are encouraged to review NXRT's final information statement and NXRT's Form 10 registration statement, filed with the SEC, for a more complete discussion of the risks and other factors that could affect any forward - looking statements.

As the editor of MIT Technology Review, I spend much of my time thinking about the types of stories and journalism that will be most valuable to our readers.

It continues to sell hundreds of thousands of copies a year over 60 years after its publication and has nearly 6,000 reader reviews on Amazon with 4.5 stars.

To help our readers, we conduct in - depth reviews of these systems to try and determine their legitimacy.

Magnum Options review: The unequaled rise of the binary options services offered by Magnum Options and a request from one of our reader has prompted us to review the trading site.

Several readers commented on my recent review of Third Day's forthcoming Revelation album (out July 29th), so I thought I'd give you the chance to judge the project for yourself.

• Readers of C. S. Lewis will want to know about the first, and as far as we know only, peer - reviewed journal dedicated to his writing.

(@JoyceCarolOates): An ideal review should present the book, with appropriate quotations, & a minimum of «opinion,» so that the reader can judge for himself.

On top of it all, I got my first three - star review because «the Christian life and walk is really about certainty» and my conclusions weren't certain enough for this particular reader.

If you were to write a short review for the site it would be quite relevant, and I am confident that your readers would appreciate being introduced to a new realm of personal and spiritual creativity, especially for free!

(The Amazon reviews and the response of audiences when I give presentations suggest most readers have not needed clarification; they seem to know when to laugh.)

Readers of First Things should by now be well - acquainted with the heated national debate - in part inspired by these very pages - over the role and legitimacy of the modern Supreme Court, armed with the power of judicial review, in a country that proclaims itself to be self - governing.

Do you agree to read and review on Amazon any books I send you as part of the Advanced Reader Team?

David Smolin does a disservice to the readers of First Things in his review of Hadley Arkes» recent book, Natural Rights and the Right to Choose.

David Smolin's review of Hadley Arkes» new book, Natural Rights and the Right to Choose (February), disserves both the author and the readers of First Things.

One of our readers points out that the review by Kevin Flannery of Roger Scruton's The Philosopher on Dover Beach (December 1991) misquotes Matthew Arnold's «Dover Beach.»

For the edification of the readers of what used to call itself a family newspaper, Ben Brantley a few days earlier reviewed «The Opposite Sex Is Neither,» a play in which Kate Bornstein is the sole performer.

A reader writes suggesting we review a book arguing that the earth is the centre of the universe.

Our friends at the Claremont Review of Books are generously offering free access for First Things web readers to a couple of articles in their latest (excellent) issue.

Gabriele Schwab, «Reader - response and the Aesthetic Experience of Otherness», Stanford Literature Review 3 (1992), 127.

Readers of the New York Review of Books learned that much in June 1997, when they read a lengthy, two - part tirade in which Gould attempted to settle scores with some of his more prominent enemies within the guild of Darwinists.

«Then I was a regular reader of journals forever commending accommodation to modernity; now I am drawn to the tough - love countercultural criticism of Communio, First Things, New Oxford Review and Thirty Days..

Thus David Spanier, a «diplomatic correspondent for Independent Radio News in London,» could tell readers of the New York Times Book Review that «the Berlin Wall was not about bricks and barbed wire in defense of Marxism, but about people.»

4 Because of the specialized nature of the journal in which this review appears, a fairly broad familiarity with Hartshorne's basic position can be assumed for the reader.

Last winter, Jehoshua Porath, an Israeli historian, wrote in the New York Review of Books (January 16, 1986): «I am reluctant to bore the reader and myself with further examples of Mrs. Peter's highly tendentious use — or neglect — of the available source material.

Autobiographical fallacies aside, I can now only repeat something Borges said, a paraphrase of Mark Twain he cited in reviewing Kipling's autobiography (Something of Myself) in El Hogar: «It is not possible for a man to tell the truth about himself, or to keep from conveying to the reader the truth about himself.»

Readers who've finished Ephraim Radner's unambiguous review of Candida Moss» The Myth of Persecution (May 2013) may be interested to know that the exchange continues in Notre Dame's Irish Rover, the school's alternative Catholic paper.

... wow, lot's of mis - statements here by people speculating about the Bible and Jesus, including those of you who think the books of the Bible were written a few hundred years ago (Moses penned it around 1400BC)... the Bible is a collection of the most investigated writings of all time, so there is a tremendous amount of credible archeological and scientific material in this world available for review rooted in verifiable investigations... my response, read the Bible, do your own investigation, determine the Truth for yourself... hopefully, anne rice's denouncement of faith in the God of the Bible (it's difficult for me to believe she ever had Saving Faith in the first place) will bring some readers to investigate and find the Truth... God will call the Elect, not one more, not one less...

«18 Gramsci also claimed four - fifths of the readers of Marinetti's review, Lacerba, with a circulation of twenty thousand, were from the working class.

I don't know whether Mukasey intended to mislead your readers, but he should certainly apologize to the author of the book under review for accusing him of factual error.

I kept thinking of new ones and readers keep suggesting classics for me to review.