Sentences with phrase «many stories of creation»

In February, Gallagher published The Airbnb Story: How Three Ordinary Guys Disrupted an Industry, Made Billions... and Created Plenty of Controversy, telling the behind - the - scenes story of the creation and rise of the online lodging platform.

So if I make up a story of creation that's full of magic men in the sky my fairytale is believable?

William Buckland, Charles Lyell, Louis Agassiz, and Adam Sedgewick were all 19th century Christian geologists who originally set out to prove the story of creation and Noah's Flood.

Suffice it to say that nobody believe the Bible story of creation except Christians (and fundamentalist Jews and Muslims, to the extent they share the same mythology).

My point is that claiming the bible story of creation to be true and denying evolution is every bit as inane as denying that microorganisms cause disease.

Here is how we must proceed in our efforts to continue its advance: Begin with the story of creation and apply it to the economic order.

Of course, most of the Holy Bible is plagiarism from other belief systems — everything from the story of creation to the great flood was taken from other cultures and religions.

Whitehead's gloss on the story of creation is apt: «The account of the sixth day should be written, He gave them speech, and they became souls» (MT 57).

The story of the creation is not the tale of the start of the world, bot it is the story of the victory of the God's Garden over the jungle of chaos and domination.

The story of the creation, which center piece is the garden, is to overcome the chaos of the jungle.

At that time there were many stories of creation current among the Israelites and their neighbours, relics of a ruder age.

This child found in Tolkien's epic story of goodness overcoming evil a literary parallel to the divine metanarrative of the Bible, an imaginative path to finding a place in God's epic story of creation, fall, redemption, and restoration.

It starts at the Beginning... two stories of creation, and each one different, and contradictory.

But what a richness there is in the contradictions — in those two different stories of creation, or those four portraits of Jesus, or in the divergent views on faith and works that we find in the book of James and the letters of Paul.

The story of creation and the story of the fall, for example, like the account of the last things in the Book of Revelation, may properly be called myths, since they are concerned with absolute beginnings and endings or with universally predicable truths, about which no precise conceptual statements can be made and which are best expressed in pictorial language.

A retelling of the story of creation along with the disobedience of Adam and Eve is crucial.

There was only one story of creation in the Bible when I read it — it was called Genesis — Where in the Bible is this «other story» of creation?

If we ask, «What are the chances that ancient Israel's stories of creation contain valid scientific information?»

My Lutheran family and the Lutheran congregation in which I grew up were never very concerned about defending the literal truth of the Genesis stories of creation.

Even so, myths have a way of providing insights that transcend the culture which creates them, and the two stories of creation taken together can do this for us.

And if they are God's stories of creation, they can't possibly be wrong.

We realize that ancient Israel, like virtually every culture known to us, had its stories of creation.

But if you see the Bible as a human product, then the Genesis stories of creation are ancient Israel's stories of creation.

Evolution may not have engineered our brains to know everything, but science has widened our knowledge through its stories — Big Bang cosmology writes the scientific story of creation, chemistry writes the story of origins, biology writes the evolutionary epic, neuroscience provides the tales of the mind, and complexity sciences are producing still newer stories that cross traditional disciplinary lines.

Most of the first three chapters of Genesis, which record the two stories of creation, has been mistranslated, misinterpreted and misused.

In the story of creation recorded in the Hebrew Bible, the word for «create» is used only with God as subject.

Evolution does not deny the existence of the Christian God or the story of creation described in the Christian bible.

the biblical story of creation was written by men with no scientific training whatsoever.

The main biblical evidence is (1) the stories of the creation (Gen.I: 26 - 27 with 5:1 - 2; 2:18 - 25) and the fall (3:16 - 20); (2) Jesus» respect for women, whom he consistently treated as men's equals (Luke 8:1 - 3; 10:38 - 42; 11:28 - 28; 13:10 - 17; 21:1 - 4; Mark 5:22 - 42; John 4:7 - 38; 8:3 - 11; 12:1 - 8; (3) references to women ministering in the apostolic church by prophesying, leading in prayer, teaching, practicing Samaritanship both informally and as widows and deacons, and laboring in the gospel with Apostles (Acts 2:17 - 21; 9:36 - 42; 18:24 - 26; 21:9 Rom.

If one destroyed the Genesis story of creation and substituted the gradual emergence of different forms as they struggled for survival in their environment, then one destroyed the entire argument for the proof of God from the evidence of creation.

Here we can see that the Genesis story of creation, like the Revelation account of «the end», is to be taken as a way of saying that as all has proceeded ultimately from the divine Love, so all is in the end directed to the divine Love.

after much thinking the calts called the Denisova the Elves (the children o Danu) and the Neanderthal the Fomorii (children of Danu) we were hums (the children of MIll) in their mythological text making the pretanic religion older and with a biblical story of the creation making them closer to the true religion,... what the mahabharata is an older text what the book of Tets has an even older creation

Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, «In the beginning...»: A Catholic Understanding of the Story of Creation and the Fall, (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1995) ix.

The author of Genesis tells a story of creation that presents the first man and woman as true partners.

The other insists that the six - day story of creation in Genesis is fact and Jesus will descend format the sky to create the kingdom of God on Earth.

As we discussed extensively on Monday, the author of Genesis tells a story of creation that presents the first man and woman as true partners.

Are you teaching them that the bible story of creation is not accurate?

The value of the stories of creation is that they proclaim something about divine creativity, to acknowledge which is a profession of faith on our part.

The first and last word, ranging in the Bible from the majestic symbolism of the Genesis story of creation to other great imagery in the book of Revelation, is that man is a spiritual creature, made in the divine likeness, the child of God and intended by God for eternity.

If theology is going to reflect wholistically, that is, in terms of the picture of current reality, then it must do so in ways consonant with the new story of creation.

The stories of creation and of incarnation not only invite every man to grapple with the Word of God; they charge him to do so.

And the Fundamentalists continue to insist that the STORY OF CREATION in Genesis is literally true in every detail, in spite of the fact that 99.9 % of all scientists reject it as a myth.

The story of creation then glosses over how he made light travel faster than light in order to make it appear that he had created the world 14 billion years ago when in fact he had created the universe only 6000 years ago.

That the biblical story of creation is true.

This is a fascinating story of the creation and early millennia of Tolkeien's universe.

We recognize, of course, the relatively late emergence in the Old Testament of a positively and precisely articulated belief in Yahweh's universal creation, and that it is not, indeed, until the time of Second Isaiah that such a belief is taken for granted.24 On the other hand, the J story of creation in Gen. 2 reflects an early if imprecise creation faith25 while the eighth - century prophets clearly stand upon a thoroughly practical though untheoretical belief in Yahweh's creative function.

The finding of two things in particular, the Story of Creation and the Story of the Flood, stirred up a tempest which was long in subsiding, and which, even yet, in some circles, causes not a little difficulty.

Found in one of the ancient libraries one day was a group of rather better tablets of large size, which, when deciphered, turned out to be the story of creation.

One of the original pillars of christendom, has a different take talks about the metaphores of the story of creation.

Somehow the biblical story of creation that saw all of life, including physical reality, as blessed by God in creation and pronounced good had been forgotten.