Sentences with phrase «many tactical approaches»

«As a first - time, young female founder who quickly grew from three people on a couch to a team of ten, we love how this book clearly outlines so many tactical approaches to communication, being a good leader, and building trust on the team.»

But there are plenty of opportunities to invest in stocks right now if you're willing to take a more tactical approach.

His tactical approach utilizes all of the most recent data on growing sales in today's marketplace.

We also believe investors should be flexible and consider a tactical approach given the uncertain outlook.

Any one or combination of these tactical approaches can make up the components of an overall marketing strategy.

but the tactical approach to dealing with them struck me.

Wenger stubborn adherence to a rigid tactical approach — playing a high def line vs counter attacking opposition etc..

If Wenger can't be motivated enough to take some revenge on Mourinho, not even for the sake of the fans, after 12 losses... If his can ship 17 goals in 3 games against top level opposition and still continue with a similar approach to games, then I don't know what will ever really drive this guy to overhaul his tactical approach to compete more fiercely against big teams...

An intelligent hūman being would realise the potential in utelising there skills and creating a unique tactical approach.

Speaking at a press conference this evening, the Gunners chief outlined the kind of tactical approach and values the next Arsenal manager must have in order to continue Wenger's legacy.

but obviously you're missing the point... If you're going to play the same formation 50 games in a row with no altertations to your tactical approach.

ideas like that came about because of an alteration of tactical approach.

Their tactical approach to the role 2.

I think the CRAZIEST of all is Mr. Arsene who benched him against liverpool when he was so fit and tagged it» wrong tactical approach».

Personally although I agree that Arsene Wenger is no longer than man to lead Arsenal forward and his tactical approach is certainly outdated, I don't think he's completely lost it.

To think, Mourinho was lambasted for his tactical approach at Anfield earlier in the season.

Starting OX in the left flank was a tactical approach.

Given the way Dortmund were set up, the 4 -2-3-1 would have been a better tactical approach to the game.

Let's stop thinking that just throwing money around is the one and only approach to winning a game successfully and maybe think about a more tactical approach and breeding more players like the Shearer's, Wrights and Cole's.

it might be wrong for me to say that wener is tactically deficient?or too one dimensional in his tactical approach to games (especially the big ones).

1) What our tactical approach is going to be; there seems to have been a transition away from possession football to more direct / setpiece play.

Also with another striker there is the added benefit of a different tactical approach, because sometimes with our attacks are very entertaining but don't produce anything (like a monkey on a tricycle).

The biggest problems are his failure to adapt his tactical approach to equal (or better) opponents.

Sorry, but I take a little exception to what you said in regards to Stoke and Chelsea tactical approach when playing us.

I have to agree with Paul Mearson's assessment of our tactical approach after going 3 0 up.....

Loosening the purse strings may solve one of our greatest issues, but another is whether Wenger is wise enough to realise that certain games require a different tactical approach.

However, if the need comes, Wenger may bring upon Giroud, Welbeck or Walcott from bench and change the tactical approach.

No tactical approach allows a player to allow threats to defence in the hope of blaming the manager's tactics.

They are pushed so high up with pitch because that is what they do every game, it's part of Wenger's tactical approach.

Your tactical approach exposing flaws, without highlighting them, tells us nothing.

We went with a different tactical approach for yesterdays game.

The reason Welbeck is OK is that he fits in well with the tactical approach Wenger is using — need a big striker up front.

No ruthlessness, no tactical approach, no change if things when things aren't going our way, only folding hands on his seat and attacking the officials.

He need to strengthen the squad (CB, CDM, CF & wingers), value fans feedback, improve his tactical approach depending on the quality of the opponent.

Wenger has been flexible in his tactical approach in certain games this season, but they haven't paid much dividends apart from the victories at the Etihad Stadium and Old Trafford recently.

I think the lack of width is the biggest remaining weakness in Wenger's tactical approach.

but how they do it is the one thing i've been screaming for for ages... a change in tactical approach they City tend to play these 3 formations 4 -3-3 or the 4 -1-2-1-2 (false 9) or a 4 -4-2 Diamond with interchanging fowards meaning that wingers the number 10 and the CF never stay in the same positions for more than 20 mins....

We are advocating for Wenger to be flexible in his tactical approach, how about we being flexible in our support and cut the team some slack!

not match analysis, no tactical approach to a match, just imagine some stuff and write rubbish

It's been argued that Wenger gives his players far too much freedom on the pitch where a planned tactical approach would have better served them.

He fast, skillful and a good finisher, so he can complement Giroud by sharing the burden upfront, offer a different tactical approach by playing as the cf by himself, gives Giroud rest and competition up front.

How do you explain it when a coach will not change his tactical approach to a game in the course of 90 minutes even when it is obvious to all

No tactical approach, always making a same for same sub and always playing Ozil despite his persistent inability to influence the game.

I don't know if he is «better» than Sanchez or Campbell but I think he fits better with Wenger's tactical approach.

I believe the issue is with Arsene Wenger and his tactical approach to games and team management as a whole.

But what about them being miles ahead of us in terms of quality and tactical approach?

what happen with the poor tactical approaches??

You know there are other formations that do nt neccesarily require a CDM, with the midfielders we have i think we have the luxury of contemplating different tactical approaches, Wishere has shown the an ability of playing a deeper role not neccesarily DM, more on the lines of a deep lying playmaker, so the reason we shouldn't experiment and see weather it could actually work is because seancali doesn't believe it would work...

Kinda makes sense though, the only reason people are asking for another CDM is because we all fear the possibility of injury to coquelin and know flamini is usless, beilick is inexperienced so it begs the question what happens if an injury where to occur, but wîth how many midfielders we have in the squad i think it could allow us to change a tactical approach and potentially experiment with people like Ramsey and Wishere potentially playing a deeper role??? But the striker is a must as i mentioned earlier Giroud went 8 games without scoring a goal and none of the other strikers stepped up to the plate, we cant have a drought of goals when your the quest for titles...

I like his tactical approach to the game and the way he communicates with his players.