Sentences with phrase «many traditional divorces»

Crosby estimates that divorce professionals spend only 20 percent of the time on a Wevorce case that they would spend on a traditional divorce.

If, as Abedin says, they are «devoted to doing what is best for our son,» then they have a few options — have a traditional divorce and live apart, divorce and birdnest, or transform their marriage into a parenting marriage.

The traditional divorce process can be extremely expensive and can create an adversarial climate that can require lengthy litigation, which is often unnecessary.

In a traditional divorce, couples with children would have the stress of child support and custody arrangements.

The collaborative divorce process offers divorcing spouses flexibility not available in traditional divorce.

These types of divorces are generally less expensive and quicker than traditional divorces that are required to go through trial.

In the traditional divorce process, countless depositions and hearings are held as each party conducts a fishing expedition into the other party's finances; in the collaborative process, the clients retain a joint neutral financial professional to ensure transparency, develop options for family support and division of property and debt, and help the clients transition into single life on a firmer financial footing.

In the traditional divorce process, the most important factor is the law; in the collaborative process, the most important factor is the family and its values.

Mediation is a form of alternative dispute resolution that avoids the lengthiness, emotional difficulty, and potential expense of traditional divorce litigation.

In the traditional divorce process, disputes are resolved by a judge in a public courtroom; in the collaborative process, disputes are resolved by the spouses in private conference rooms.

More often than not, the option that makes sense is not the traditional divorce process.

In the traditional divorce process, an adversarial process dictates that spouses are «opposing parties» and their attorneys are «opposing counsel;» in the collaborative process, spouses are recognized as co-parents and their attorneys are collaborative colleagues and teammates.

Instead, you may have to follow the traditional divorce proceeding route.

It can be less costly than a litigated divorce and offers more privacy than traditional divorce litigation, since the process, discussions and negotiations are kept confidential.

The length of time needed for a collaborative divorce is often substantially less than that of the traditional divorce process, where the parties are at the mercy of the court's schedule.

For most people, they will go through the traditional divorce process.

In traditional divorce, since each spouse is zealously represented by their respective attorneys, it is no surprise that these proceedings are quite costly due to the extensive time involved in building a case for one's positions, often with the assistance of one or more forensic accountants or business appraisers.

We offer services for Collaborative Divorce, Conventional or Traditional Divorce, Child Custody, Parental Rights, Child Support and Maintenance.

The traditional divorce process could last for years, not only in waiting for the court's availability but also in completing the tedious process of document sharing and compilation.

In mediation, unlike the traditional divorce process, you work cooperatively with a neutral third party (the mediator).

In practical terms, this means that the attorneys are not conducting the usual opposition research to highlight an opposing party's parental or other flaws in preparation for trial (which can be the most destructive part of the traditional divorce process).

The traditional divorce process can be expensive and time - consuming, and often produces solutions that don't work very effectively.

The traditional divorce litigation process is the quickest and most permanent way to destroy those feelings.

In a traditional divorce case, this would have taken months of pleadings, court hearings, potentially mediation and thousands of dollars to accomplish what we accomplished in two hours.

Unlike in traditional divorce, each spouse will have an attorney who will focus solely on helping the family reach an agreement that is acceptable to everyone.

Though we have the experience, skill and knowledge gained from more than 30 years of representing men and women in traditional divorce proceedings, we understand the appeal of the collaborative approach and encourage clients to resolve their differences amicably, whenever possible.

Maybe you have minor children and need to get along for their sake, or maybe you want to avoid the time and expense of the traditional divorce process.

In Collaborative Divorce, you each have your own Family Lawyers helping you sort out your needs, just as in traditional divorce.

Unlike traditional divorce lawyers, Rule 4 - 1.19 requires collaborative attorneys to do the following:

Traditional divorce can increase this pain, leaving bitterness that may last for years.

- In a traditional divorce, the court process often causes hostility and conflict within a family and places the...

Equitable Mediation took traditional divorce mediation and flipped it on its head.

Perhaps one of the most important reasons people choose collaborative divorce instead of traditional divorce litigation is because of the sense of respect and open communication it fosters, which makes for a healthier family after the divorce.

Unlike traditional divorce litigation, matrimonial arbitration is conducted in private, between the spouses, their attorneys and the arbitrator.

Along with it being much more cooperative and positive than going to court, a collaborative divorce can take less time and cost less money than a traditional divorce.

To the extent you and your partner are willing however you can, in large part, avoid the exaggerated injury that often accompanies the traditional divorce process.

Furthermore, a mediated divorce is usually much less expensive and takes considerably less time to complete than a traditional divorce settled in court.

He works with both traditional divorces, and large cases that require complex business valuation, framing of assets, net disposable income, taxation and all aspects of complicated financial matters involved in such cases.

The traditional divorce model pits husband versus wife, mother versus father.

The spouses then proceed as «opposing parties» in the traditional divorce court route.

A family neutral gives families access to support and guidance for managing these emotions which can intensify the conflict and derail settlement attempts in traditional divorce.

Clients that are willing to conduct a collaborative divorce will pay less than their counterparts that choose a traditional divorce.

In a traditional divorce setting, especially those that reach a trial in court, the clients have virtually no say in the outcome as they have given that power to the court.

In a traditional divorce, Psychologists are used as expert witnesses to perform Custody Evaluations and then provide a written report or testify in court regarding their recommendation about the best custodial arrangement for the children.

Overview of Annulment Like a traditional divorce, an annulment ends a marriage.

Did you know that there are other ways to dissolve a marriage then to file a traditional divorce?

A waiver divorce is an uncontested procedure that allows couples to end their marriage without the cost and delay common to traditional divorce.

And unlike the traditional divorce process where all the work goes on behind the scenes, participants in mediation are much more aware of delays and the costs they are incurring.

The Coach's role, in many ways, is the most complicated and nuanced of any of the professionals and the most different from traditional divorce litigation or negotiation.

Although certain state eligibility requirements must first be met, uncontested divorces typically can be finalized faster that traditional divorces, as the parties do not need to litigate their issues in court.