Sentences with phrase «many valid interpretations»

All I am saying if ham wants to read into a certain phrase and interpret it as he sees fit then other just a valid interpretations would apply.

Today, valid interpretation of Genesis 1 - 4 allows an old Earth and recent Adam, a pre-Semitic leader with God - imbued moral capacity.

The question of can it prevent some singular instance of violence is also a valid interpretation — but not the only one.

Indeed, for her, as for an increasing number of scholars, the text is open to various valid interpretations.

I agree that this is a valid interpretation but it is not the only one.

A localized flood of some sort is a valid interpretation.

Michael offers a VALID interpretation of Scripture here (and there is a much more detailed look at these scriptures at http://www.soulforce.org/article/homosexuality-bible-gay-christian).

So, this means that there is ONE valid interpretation to any text, unless the author purposely designed the text in such a way as to make people ponder various interpretations (which would be a certain kind of genre, but not most texts).

Valid interpretation is a listening to what can not be heard without the parable; allegorizing is a speech imposed on the parable, telling it what it must mean.

In valid interpretation we feel our way into each symbol in order to sense the surplus of meaning that beckons us beyond ourselves to discover something new.

The bible does not have just 1 valid interpretation.

Whitehead's interpretive system is dynamic in its rationalism and does not limit valid interpretation to philosophers and scientists.

If this isn't your intention, then I'd encourage you to find ways of communicating that there is more than one valid interpretation of any one blog post.

I'm just suggesting that you consider there are many valid interpretations of the bible, and that God can love and speak to people of different faiths as well as fundamentalist Christians.

It is God's divine word in print and therefore has the only valid interpretation.

But Labaree has a particularly subtle and I believe valid interpretation of history.

To establish criterion - related evidence of validity, VAM estimates should be highly correlated with other criterion, all of which should yield valid interpretations and uses.

Accordingly, if VAM estimates are highly correlated to biasing factors, then it becomes impossible to make valid interpretations about the causes of student achievement gains or losses as intended.

Not to recognize this reality leads us to using the 2014 SB achievement levels and disseminating more than three million student test scores for California students and schools that have no basis for valid interpretations....

The installation brings these works together as an opportunity to read them with an eye towards retaining spiritual possibilities as a valid interpretation of contemporary artwork.

But today, I come over to find some serious love for Mr. Smith, who's spending him some tax dollars in order to steer the science of climate more towards what he, as a freakin» politician, thinks is the more valid interpretation of the evidence.

In that case they could both be fair reflections of the science — within certain limits there doesn't have to be just one single valid interpretation.

But Graham says that since fiction lets you know exactly what's going on in the mind of a character — which you can't in real life — and persuades you to take a character's painstakingly edited interpretation of an event as the only valid interpretation, it can be troublesome to take a novel - reading mentality into reality.

characterise the psychometric properties of the translated and culturally - adapted versions of the outcome measures, including factor structure and item function) to augment and inform the valid interpretation of the prevalence and risk factor estimates.

Not exact matches

My leadership in the past has used the book (not trying to be disrespectful), and specifically their interpretation as the only valid one, to remove my freedom to think for myself.

Mark Driscoll's interpretation is just as valid as the baptist preachers or the methodist preachers or insert whatever church you want.

Others, perhaps those with a stricter, academic understanding of feminism, will be disappointed not actually to discover a valid segment of feminism that has been lost among the shuffling conversation Mobley primarily set out to interpret Montgomery's great theme» «The emancipation of women through the gospel of Jesus Christ»» but because he tangled his interpretation with the controversial vocabulary of feminism, he will not please everyone.

Your opinion isn't worth an infestation, and my interpretation is as valid as yours.

There might be many interpretations, but not all are equally valid, and in the conflict of interpretations the text itself can mediate.

You seem to think that your interpretation of the bible is somehow more valid than other interpretation.

This means that, whilst all interpretation is provisional (which I think might be the main point you are making) not all are equally valid.

In interpreting his biblical texts Bultmann made use of these ideas with a vigor which promises that his basic principles of interpretation may survive, still seem valid, when the misty vocabulary of Heidegger's early philosophy no longer seems compelling.

But this does not mean that what was seen as valid and relevant for one time should necessarily be seen as valid and relevant for all time, especially since this interpretation carries certain unfortunate notions prevalent at that time.

In one sense this criticism is indeed valid, for in this interpretation of his resurrection it is not Jesus but God who is the subject, God having raised the concrete experiences of Jesus into «objective immortality» in himself.

For you to suggest that there may be some other «valid» interpretation if one takes into consideration the «historical / cultural context of scripture», is to invoke a straw man logical fallacy.

But does any experience give conclusive evidence that our interpretation is valid?

In a religious view such as that outlined in this book, the aim would be to include the permanently valid insights of both the earlier and the later modes of interpretation.

We have already pointed out that biblical interpreters in the first century used very different methods from ours and some of the interpretations which men of those days found very convincing may no longer seem valid to us.

Both interpretations, though different, are valid and acceptable and true, and that's because they complement each other.

Rachel's interpretation is just as valid as anyone else's: you're all deluded if you believe in imaginary creatures.

If it's open, then it's open to anyone, and every interpretation is equally valid.

In this paper, I want to challenge this interpretation, because it is at least one - sided and this one - sidedness has some important consequences, both for the interpretation of Whitehead's philosophy itself and for the claim that this philosophy is a valid contemporary metaphysics, addressing all basic metaphysical issues in an intelligible war.

On the internet: not all interpretations are valid, nor sound.

To the valid theme of the Christological ethic worked out by van Buren add the emphasis on Protestant worldliness both as an interpretation of the Reformation and as an attack on certain forms of modern sensibility.

I have advocated that whatever is valid concerning disclosures can be subsumed under the first rubric, since disclosures involve the interpretation of experience rather than the acquisition of self - authenticating knowledge.

Your own interpretation of the Bible is only as valid as the pastor who interprets it for you from the pulpit.

According to Steve scripture is by the prophet's own interpretation, which in reality is no more valid than ours.

2) she makes a very valid point, and she is absolutely correct about the bible having many different interpretations.

It's not a valid excuse for such a being, to say that the flaw is in the interpretations by readers; such a purportedly divine being should be perfectly (yes, stress that word «perfectly»!)-RRB-

But we would not concur that this latter interpretation is valid.