Sentences with phrase «marginal for side impact»
Not exact matches
Safety In Insurance Institute for Highway Safety crash tests, the CX - 9 earned the top score, Good, in frontal and side - impact tests and Marginal in roof strength and rear - impact tests.
https://www.cars.com/
In crash testing conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the Santa Fe earned a top «Good» rating in moderate - overlap frontal - offset, side - impact and roof - strength tests and a second - lowest «Marginal» rating in the small - overlap frontal - offset test.
In crash testing, the Maxima receives a» «good»» rating for frontal - offset crashes and a» «marginal»» rating for side - impact crashes.
The Challenger doesn't perform well in small overlap crash testing, scoring «Marginal» results from the IIHS, but scored best results of Good for the moderate front overlap and side impact test.
IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in high - speed front and side crash tests, a roof strength test for rollover protection, plus evaluations of seats / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.
The two vehicles that earned top ratings in front and side tests were rated too low (marginal) for protection in rear impacts.
More importantly, however, is the fact that the 2016 Honda Pilot should be safer than the outgoing model, earning «good» ratings for moderate overlap frontal offset, small overlap frontal offset, side impact, and roof strength, which was an improvement over the previous gen model, which received a «poor» rating for small overlap frontal offset and a «marginal» rating for roof strength for the 2009 to 2011 model years.
The IIHS crash tested the Rio sedan and only gave it a «Marginal» rating for the small overlap front impact and an «Acceptable» rating for the side impact.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) lists the Ford Explorer as good for the moderate front overlap, side impact and roof strength, but it gets a marginal rating for the tougher small front overlap test.
In the side impact, protection for the head was rated as marginal.
The good rating for side impact protection is a significant improvement over the previous generation 5, which was rated only marginal in the same test.
IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in a moderate overlap frontal crash, small overlap frontal crash, side impact and rollover, plus evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.
IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in a moderate overlap frontal crash, small overlap frontal crash, side impact and rollover, as well as evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.
The IIHS also tested a Wrangler Unlimited, rating it «Good» in the moderate - overlap and small - overlap frontal - offset tests and «Marginal» for both side - impact and whiplash protection.
The death rate for Kia's smallest model is 102, a reflection of the car's marginal small overlap front rating and an acceptable side impact rating (as opposed to good, which the previous three cars achieved).
The IIHS also tested a 2015 Wrangler Unlimited, rating it «Good» in the moderate - overlap frontal - offset test and «Marginal» for both side - impact and whiplash protection.
Three models are marginal or poor for side - impact protection.
In the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of rib compression indicated a marginal level of protection for the chest but protection of other parts of the body was good.
The Institute rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal, or poor based on performance in high - speed front and side crash tests plus evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.
The lower side impact score was due in part to a marginal rating for the structure / safety cage category.
In Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) crash tests, the 2009 Ram received a Good overall score in the frontal crash test, and a Marginal score in the side impact test, [28] as well as the roof strength test.
The Institute rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal, or poor based on performance in high - speed front and side crash tests plus evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.