Sentences with phrase «marginal in side impact crash»

Three of six large car models earn the top rating of good, but one is marginal in side impact crash tests conducted by IIHS.

Not exact matches

Safety In Insurance Institute for Highway Safety crash tests, the CX - 9 earned the top score, Good, in frontal and side - impact tests and Marginal in roof strength and rear - impact testIn Insurance Institute for Highway Safety crash tests, the CX - 9 earned the top score, Good, in frontal and side - impact tests and Marginal in roof strength and rear - impact testin frontal and side - impact tests and Marginal in roof strength and rear - impact testin roof strength and rear - impact tests.
In crash testing conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the Santa Fe earned a top «Good» rating in moderate - overlap frontal - offset, side - impact and roof - strength tests and a second - lowest «Marginal» rating in the small - overlap frontal - offset tesIn crash testing conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the Santa Fe earned a top «Good» rating in moderate - overlap frontal - offset, side - impact and roof - strength tests and a second - lowest «Marginal» rating in the small - overlap frontal - offset tesin moderate - overlap frontal - offset, side - impact and roof - strength tests and a second - lowest «Marginal» rating in the small - overlap frontal - offset tesin the small - overlap frontal - offset test.
In crash testing, the Maxima receives a» «good»» rating for frontal - offset crashes and a» «marginal»» rating for side - impact crashes.
The Challenger doesn't perform well in small overlap crash testing, scoring «Marginal» results from the IIHS, but scored best results of Good for the moderate front overlap and side impact test.
Protection in side impacts improves, but most cars tested still afford marginal or poor protection in rear crashes
IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in high - speed front and side crash tests, a roof strength test for rollover protection, plus evaluations of seats / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.
IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in a moderate overlap frontal crash, small overlap frontal crash, side impact and rollover, plus evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.
IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in a moderate overlap frontal crash, small overlap frontal crash, side impact and rollover, as well as evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.
The Institute rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal, or poor based on performance in high - speed front and side crash tests plus evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.
In Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) crash tests, the 2009 Ram received a Good overall score in the frontal crash test, and a Marginal score in the side impact test, [28] as well as the roof strength tesIn Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) crash tests, the 2009 Ram received a Good overall score in the frontal crash test, and a Marginal score in the side impact test, [28] as well as the roof strength tesin the frontal crash test, and a Marginal score in the side impact test, [28] as well as the roof strength tesin the side impact test, [28] as well as the roof strength test.
The Institute rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal, or poor based on performance in high - speed front and side crash tests plus evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.
The IIHS performs side impact and rollover crash tests and rates vehicles as poor, marginal, acceptable, or good based on their performances in these tests.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z