Three of six large car models earn the top rating of good, but one is
marginal in side impact crash tests conducted by IIHS.
Not exact matches
Safety
In Insurance Institute for Highway Safety crash tests, the CX - 9 earned the top score, Good, in frontal and side - impact tests and Marginal in roof strength and rear - impact test
In Insurance Institute for Highway Safety
crash tests, the CX - 9 earned the top score, Good,
in frontal and side - impact tests and Marginal in roof strength and rear - impact test
in frontal and
side -
impact tests and
Marginal in roof strength and rear - impact test
in roof strength and rear -
impact tests.
In crash testing conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the Santa Fe earned a top «Good» rating in moderate - overlap frontal - offset, side - impact and roof - strength tests and a second - lowest «Marginal» rating in the small - overlap frontal - offset tes
In crash testing conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, the Santa Fe earned a top «Good» rating
in moderate - overlap frontal - offset, side - impact and roof - strength tests and a second - lowest «Marginal» rating in the small - overlap frontal - offset tes
in moderate - overlap frontal - offset,
side -
impact and roof - strength tests and a second - lowest «
Marginal» rating
in the small - overlap frontal - offset tes
in the small - overlap frontal - offset test.
In crash testing, the Maxima receives a» «good»» rating for frontal - offset
crashes and a» «
marginal»» rating for
side -
impact crashes.
The Challenger doesn't perform well
in small overlap
crash testing, scoring «
Marginal» results from the IIHS, but scored best results of Good for the moderate front overlap and
side impact test.
Protection
in side impacts improves, but most cars tested still afford
marginal or poor protection
in rear
crashes
IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable,
marginal or poor based on performance
in high - speed front and
side crash tests, a roof strength test for rollover protection, plus evaluations of seats / head restraints for protection against neck injuries
in rear
impacts.
IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable,
marginal or poor based on performance
in a moderate overlap frontal
crash, small overlap frontal
crash,
side impact and rollover, plus evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries
in rear
impacts.
IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable,
marginal or poor based on performance
in a moderate overlap frontal
crash, small overlap frontal
crash,
side impact and rollover, as well as evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries
in rear
impacts.
The Institute rates vehicles good, acceptable,
marginal, or poor based on performance
in high - speed front and
side crash tests plus evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries
in rear
impacts.
In Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) crash tests, the 2009 Ram received a Good overall score in the frontal crash test, and a Marginal score in the side impact test, [28] as well as the roof strength tes
In Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS)
crash tests, the 2009 Ram received a Good overall score
in the frontal crash test, and a Marginal score in the side impact test, [28] as well as the roof strength tes
in the frontal
crash test, and a
Marginal score
in the side impact test, [28] as well as the roof strength tes
in the
side impact test, [28] as well as the roof strength test.
The Institute rates vehicles good, acceptable,
marginal, or poor based on performance
in high - speed front and
side crash tests plus evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries
in rear
impacts.
The IIHS performs
side impact and rollover
crash tests and rates vehicles as poor,
marginal, acceptable, or good based on their performances
in these tests.