Sentences with phrase «marital cohesion»

Thus, a couple's commitment to continue infertility treatment despite failures can increase spouses» closeness, and shared hardships and disappointments may create a feeling of marital cohesion (Peterson et al., 2003).

Couples with successful ART have been reported to show greater marital cohesion (e.g. a mutual feeling of being a couple, sharing things and ideas)(Slade et al., 1997), less marital distress (Benazon et al., 1992), to experience their relationships with their partners in a more positive way (Strauss et al., 1992) and to have more stable relationships (Sydsjö et al., 2002) than couples experiencing spontaneous pregnancy.

It comprises of 125 - items to be answered on a 5 - point Likert scale ranging from very dissatisfied to very satisfied that are grouped into 14 domains; Idealistic Distortion, Marital Satisfaction, Personality Issues, Communication, Conflict Resolution, Financial Management, Leisure Activities, Sexual Relationship, Children and Parenting, Family and Friends, Equalitarian Roles, Religious Orientation, Marital Cohesion and Marital Change (Fowers & Olson, 1989).

They found that meaningful rituals contribute to marital cohesion during the transition to parenthood, encourage involvement of older family members with children, and contribute to the sense of identity of adolescents.

Not exact matches

Previous studies have identified four subscale factors measuring marital satisfaction, degree of consensus between partners, amount of affectionate expression in the relationship, and dyadic cohesion, or the degree to which partners function as a team.

Studies that examine the ways in which husbands and wives affect one another's well - being, those focused on the ways in which characteristics of the marital dyad (e.g., marital satisfaction, cohesion, quality) affect couple well - being, and those examining how similar and discrepant perceptions held by husbands and wives affect outcomes are important directions to pursue.

Furthermore, the positive relation found between prebirth marital quality and coparenting cohesion at 3 months was also solely found in families with highly reactive infants (r =.71, p <.05).

Cohesion has been positively correlated with Social Support Appraisals, the Locke - Wallace Marital Adjustment Scale, the Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale, and the Parental Bonding Instrument (Moos & Moos, 2002).

The FACES IV was designed to measure the cohesion and flexibility dimensions outlined in Olson's Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems.

The narratives in this study show how poor neighborhood social capital is buffered by family cohesion and how poor family can be buffered by the marital relationship.

It yields a global measure of marital well being, as well as subscales for the following dimensions of marital functioning: Consensus, Satisfaction, Cohesion, and Affectional Expression.

Second, couple cohesion was fully mediated between motives for sacrifice and marital satisfaction for both wives and husbands.

Family conflict and cohesion, metabolic control, ethnicity, parent education, and marital status did not significantly moderate change in QOL.

For the first analysis, intraindividual family (conflict, cohesion, marital status, and number of adults in home), psychosocial (symptoms of anxiety and depression), medical (prepump regimen, metabolic control, and illness duration), and demographic variables (child and parent age, parent education, and ethnicity) were analyzed as predictors of QOL at the prepump assessment.

The T2 / T3 reliabilities of wives» perceptions were good (dyadic consensus, α = 0.86 / 0.88; marital satisfaction, α = 0.85 / 0.84; dyadic cohesion, α = 0.76 / 0.80 and sexual affection, α = 0.72 / 0.65), as were those of the husbands (dyadic consensus, α = 0.88 / 0.88; marital satisfaction, α = 0.78 / 0.80; dyadic cohesion, α = 0.73 / 0.73 and sexual affection, α = 0.75 / 0.61).

No between - group differences were found in marital satisfaction and dyadic cohesion.

TY - JOUR AU - 서기영 AU - Heekyung Lee TI - The Influence of Motives for Sacrifice on Marital Satisfaction: Mediating Effect of Couple Cohesion T2 - Korea Journal of Counseling PY - 2014 VL - 15 IS - 3 PB - Korean Counseling Association (KCA) SP - 1299 - 1318 SN - 1598 - 2068 AB - This study examined the mediating effects of couple cohesion between motives for sacrifice and marital satisfaction, and investigated the actor and partner effects of motives for sacrifice and couple cohesion on marital satisfaction based on advanced researches about approach - avoidance motivation theory and marital satisfMarital Satisfaction: Mediating Effect of Couple Cohesion T2 - Korea Journal of Counseling PY - 2014 VL - 15 IS - 3 PB - Korean Counseling Association (KCA) SP - 1299 - 1318 SN - 1598 - 2068 AB - This study examined the mediating effects of couple cohesion between motives for sacrifice and marital satisfaction, and investigated the actor and partner effects of motives for sacrifice and couple cohesion on marital satisfaction based on advanced researches about approach - avoidance motivation theory and marital satisCohesion T2 - Korea Journal of Counseling PY - 2014 VL - 15 IS - 3 PB - Korean Counseling Association (KCA) SP - 1299 - 1318 SN - 1598 - 2068 AB - This study examined the mediating effects of couple cohesion between motives for sacrifice and marital satisfaction, and investigated the actor and partner effects of motives for sacrifice and couple cohesion on marital satisfaction based on advanced researches about approach - avoidance motivation theory and marital satiscohesion between motives for sacrifice and marital satisfaction, and investigated the actor and partner effects of motives for sacrifice and couple cohesion on marital satisfaction based on advanced researches about approach - avoidance motivation theory and marital satisfmarital satisfaction, and investigated the actor and partner effects of motives for sacrifice and couple cohesion on marital satisfaction based on advanced researches about approach - avoidance motivation theory and marital satiscohesion on marital satisfaction based on advanced researches about approach - avoidance motivation theory and marital satisfmarital satisfaction based on advanced researches about approach - avoidance motivation theory and marital satisfmarital satisfaction.

This scale yields an overall score and has four subscales: dyadic consensus (agreement on spending spare time, financial matters, general view of life), dyadic cohesion (having discussions together, having interests in common), marital satisfaction (the amount of quarrels, trusting one another, general happiness in relationship) and sexual affection (sexual desire, expressions of love).

In comparison to other groups, mothers of children with ASD reported greater use of maladaptive coping strategies (self - blame, wish - fulfilling fantasy), greater information seeking, less marital satisfaction, sense of competence and family adaptability, and higher family cohesion.

Third, for both husbands and wives, motives for sacrifice had actor and partner effects on couple's cohesion, but couple cohesion had actor effects on marital satisfaction.

The counseling implications and suggestions are discussed KW - motives for sacrifice, couple cohesion, marital satisfaction, actor effect, partner effect DO - 10.15703 / kjc.15.3.201406.1299 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.15703/kjc.15.3.201406.1299 ER -

This study examined the mediating effects of couple cohesion between motives for sacrifice and marital satisfaction, and investigated the actor and partner effects of motives for sacrifice and couple cohesion on marital satisfaction based on advanced researches about approach - avoidance motivation theory and marital satisfaction.

(iv) To examine how infertility and treatment characteristics predict the quality and change of marital relationships within the ART group, we conducted repeated - measure MANOVAs on dyadic consensus, marital satisfaction, dyadic cohesion and expression of affection at T2 and T3.

Family commitment, challenge, cohesion, expression and marital support are recognized as the predictors of family quality of life [29].

Women in the ART group reported lower levels of dyadic consensus and cohesion, marital satisfaction and sexual affection when exposed to stressful life events, whereas among control women, the quality of marital relations was independent of stressful life events.

Bristol [96] reported high levels of cohesion and expressiveness among parents of children with ASD to be associated with greater competence and acceptance of the child, and greater marital happiness, respectively.

Assessed the applicability of the Double ABCX model including symptom severity (A), pile - up of demands (aA), family cohesion (B), social support (bB), self - blame (C), catastrophising (cC), and coping (BC) on maternal depression and marital satisfaction (xX).

When exposed to stressful life events, women in the ART group reported lower levels of dyadic consensus [F (1,263) = 6.12, P < 0.01], dyadic cohesion, [F (1,263) = 5.05, P < 0.01] and marital satisfaction [F (1,263) = 3.84, P < 0.05], whereas among control women, the quality of marital relations was independent of stressful life events.

First, approach motives for sacrifice were positive correlated of couple cohesion and marital satisfaction, whereas avoidance motives for sacrifice were negative correlated of couple cohesion and marital satisfaction.

«The Influence of Motives for Sacrifice on Marital Satisfaction: Mediating Effect of Couple Cohesion» Korea Journal of Counseling 15, no. 3 (2014): 1299 - 1318.

The dependent variables were dyadic consensus, marital satisfaction, dyadic cohesion and sexual affection measured at T2 and T3.

The Influence of Motives for Sacrifice on Marital Satisfaction: Mediating Effect of Couple Cohesion Korea Journal of Counseling [Internet].

The Marital Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale III: Is the relation with marital adjustment linear or curviMarital Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale III: Is the relation with marital adjustment linear or curvimarital adjustment linear or curvilinear?