Sentences with phrase «marital outcomes»

In fact, one of the biggest risk factors for poor marital outcomes is getting married young.

Researchers said the differences in marital outcomes from online and offline meetings held true even after accounting for demographic differences.

It was possible to predict marital outcome over a six - year period using just the first 3 minutes of data for both husbands and wives.

All are all known to affect marital outcomes, and people who tend to date online may differ in one or more of these factors, he says.

He adds that the only way to prove that online dating has an effect on marital outcomes — positive or negative — is to do a controlled trial in which people are randomly assigned to meet people online or in the real world.

Premarital uncertainty and four - year marital outcomes.

Before they said «I do»: Discriminating among marital outcomes over 13 years based on premarital data.

The differences in marital outcomes from online and offline meetings persisted after controlling for demographic differences, but «it is possible that individuals who met their spouse online may be different in personality, motivation to form a long - term marital relationship, or some other factor,» said Cacioppo.

Trends of the Year: Ironically self - conscious sequels (22 Jump Street, Muppets Most Wanted), drum solos (Birdman, Whiplash), Tilda Swinton in terrifying makeup (Snowpiercer, The Grand Budapest Hotel), Jason Reitman making awful movies (Labor Day; Men, Women & Children), final - act defenestrations (Birdman, Ida), tragic marital outcomes for Sienna Miller (Foxcatcher, American Sniper)

It is impossible to prove with certainty that the associations between early relationship choices and marital outcomes involve causality.

«Although wife demand / husband withdraw interactions appear more commonly in couples, in the current study we found financial distress was associated with lower marital outcomes through its effects on increasing the total amount of both partners» demand / withdraw interactions.»

Conflict and love: Predicting newlywed marital outcomes from two interaction contexts.

I am presuming that when you ask about downsides of long - term relationships you are referring to whether or not the length of a premarital relationship (what researchers and your grandparents refer to as «courtship») affects marital outcomes if and when the couple marries.

This isn't to say that all accelerated courtships are doomed — and there are a lot of other factors that influence marital outcomes — but in many cases getting married after a short courtship is akin to walking on quicksand.

Marital outcomes impact the couple, their children, their community, and the culture we live in,» ssays David G. Schramm in his research of 2006 (Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Vol.

Among those who cohabited before marriage, only those who fit the following categories are likely to have marital outcomes similar to those who did not live together before marriage:

Not all of her analyses use the extensive list of control variables, however, and I think her finding that age of co-residence matters for marital outcomes makes a lot of sense.

Constraining beliefs about the need for complete assurance of personal and relational success were more strongly held, whereas beliefs that cohabitation improves later marital outcomes, successful relationships require little effort, and opposites attract were less likely to be endorsed.

Short, or accelerated, courtships are a risk factor for poor marital outcomes, including divorce (i.e., «the quicker they rise, the harder they fall»).1 The reasons for this association are fairly obvious: it is very hard for two individuals to truly get to know each other and gauge long - term compatibility in a short amount of time, and very often individuals base their relationships on feelings of passion that are highly variable (see «Am I in love?»).

The only way to prove that plus size women online dating has an effect on marital outcomes — positive or negative — is to do a controlled trial in which people are randomly assigned to meet people online or in the real world.

Startup, the way a topic of disagreement is broached, is critically important in predicting marital outcomes.

Healthy Marriages and Mental Health is filled with excerpts from a wide array of research that focuses on the alignment of marital outcomes and mental health.

«Even if a couple is experiencing distress and difficulty in other areas, gratitude in the relationship can help promote positive marital outcomes.»

Premarital Uncertainty and Four - Year Marital Outcomes» by Justin A. Lavner, Benjamin R. Karney, Thomas N. Bradbury in Journal of Family Psychology (2012).

Results showed that work - family conflict resulting from husbands» and wives» employment is related positively to the psychological distress of each, and that psychological distress affects marital outcomes both directly and indirectly through its association with greater marital hostility and less marital warmth and supportiveness.

«Marital outcomes are influenced by a variety of factors.

The greatest indicated likelihood of being in an intact marriage of the highest quality is among those who married at ages 22 - 25, net of the estimated effects of time since first marriage and several variables that might commonly affect age at marriage and marital outcomes.

That means at least part of the negative link between cohabitation and marital outcomes was driven by background characteristics rather than by the effects of cohabitation itself.

Consider the link between premarital births and marital outcomes.

This is problematic because conclusions regarding the relationship between financial communication and marital outcomes are inferred, but not empirically tested.

In order to demonstrate more precisely that communication about finances is associated with marital outcomes (and other variables), it is essential to measure financial conflict messages more directly.

Ultimately, any effect that this legislation might have for marital outcomes will become more apparent in the coming years.

A study from University of Chicago psychologist John Cacioppo that tracked how couples met and their marital outcomes between 2005 through 2012 found that 34.95 % met online, 14 % met at work, and 12 % met through friends.

Solid empirical evidence on the marital outcomes associated with meeting on - line vs. off - line is absent, however (3).

: The Relationship Between Marital Processes and Marital Outcomes,» John Gottman found that «the single biggest determinant [as to whether or not wedded couples will divorce] is the ratio of positive to negative comments the partners make to one another....

One study from the late 1980s2 found that the neuroticism (emotional instability or the tendency to experience negative emotions) of husbands and wives, «Not only predicted their marital outcomes over forty - five years later, but this effect swamped the effects of almost all other individual characteristics that they had measured.»

For the effect of marriage intention and gender on the relation between cohabitation and marital outcomes, I could also suggest the following articles:

Fifty - seven self - identified happily - married, middle - class couples in the Midwestern U.S. participated in a study investigating how men and women may differentially benefit from providing versus receiving sensitive support.1 Researchers were interested in how (a) the sensitivity of support provided (i.e., its responsiveness and attentiveness to the spouses» actions and comments) and whether (b) the husband or wife provided or received the support might predict marital outcomes.

To determine whether and how family upbringing is related to conflict resolution and marital outcomes, Dr. Rob Ackerman from the University of Texas — Dallas and colleagues analyzed data from 288 individuals and their spouses who participated in a 20 - year longitudinal study of families in rural Iowa.

Seven power - packed slideshows are filled with summarized excerpts from the vast research on the alignment of key social issues, marital outcomes and Marriage Education found in the award - winning Healthy Marriages Booklet Series.

There is much evidence that cohabitating does not yield more positive marital outcomes.

However, across the subgroup analyses presented here and in the 12 - and 30 - month impact reports, there is some evidence that couples at higher risk for poor marital outcomes and marital instability may be more likely to benefit from SHM.