Measures utilized include the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI), Effortful Control (EC), the Callous / Unemotional Traits (CU), the Parental Stress Index - Short Form,
the Marital Quality Scale (MQS - I), and the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire — Preschool, Revised.
Measures utilized include the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI), Effortful Control (EC), the Callous / Unemotional traits (CU), the Parental Stress Index - Short Form,
the Marital Quality Scale (MQS - I), and the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire — Preschool, Revised.
The tools used for screening were
Marital Quality Scale and General Health Questionnaire - 28.
Finally 20 couples with good marital quality and 20 couples with poor marital quality were selected based on scores of
Marital Quality Scale.
Israeli
Marital Quality Scale (I - MQS): Clinical and Research Application 25th Scientific Congress
Not exact matches
Marital quality was measured by the four - item version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale, a scale that includes items about marital happiness, confiding in one another, believing things are going well in the relationship, and thoughts of divorce (Sabourin, Valois, & Lussier, 2005; Spanier,
Marital quality was measured by the four - item version of the Dyadic Adjustment
Scale, a scale that includes items about marital happiness, confiding in one another, believing things are going well in the relationship, and thoughts of divorce (Sabourin, Valois, & Lussier, 2005; Spanier, 1
Scale, a
scale that includes items about marital happiness, confiding in one another, believing things are going well in the relationship, and thoughts of divorce (Sabourin, Valois, & Lussier, 2005; Spanier, 1
scale that includes items about
marital happiness, confiding in one another, believing things are going well in the relationship, and thoughts of divorce (Sabourin, Valois, & Lussier, 2005; Spanier,
marital happiness, confiding in one another, believing things are going well in the relationship, and thoughts of divorce (Sabourin, Valois, & Lussier, 2005; Spanier, 1976).
Marital quality was measured with the four - item version of the Dyadic Adjustment
Scale (Sabourin, Valois, & Lussier, 2005; Spanier, 1976).
The 32 - item Dyadic Adjustment
Scale (Spanier, 1976) measured
marital quality, with varying response
scales (e.g., 6 - point
scales of frequency all the time to never and frequency of agreement always agree to always disagree).
To construct
scales of relationship
quality and shared activity, we began by selecting indicators for each
scale based on previous research on positive and negative
marital quality and the shared activity of social relationships.
It measures
marital quality and satisfaction and consists of three
scales: quarrelling (e.g. «When we quarrel he or she keeps taunting me»), tenderness (e.g. «He or she caresses me tenderly») and closeness / communication (e.g. «We talk to each other for at least half an hour every day»).
More specifically, individuals who reported drinking alcohol showed a 0.03 decrease (on a
scale from 1 to 4) in their reports of negative
marital quality when their partners also reported drinking.
The
scale was developed for the MoBa and is based on core items used in previously developed measures of
marital satisfaction and relationship
quality [33 — 35].
Interpersonal measures that were not associated with outcomes included
Marital Quality, measured by the Israeli
Marital bonds
scale (Lavee, 1995), the Intimate Bonds Measure (Wilhelm and Parker, 1988) and the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (Spanier, 1
scale (Lavee, 1995), the Intimate Bonds Measure (Wilhelm and Parker, 1988) and the Dyadic Adjustment
Scale (Spanier, 1
Scale (Spanier, 1976).