Sentences with phrase «market is a bad thing»

If big return jumps are a bad thing (since they cause lower returns going forward), bull markets are a bad thing.

None of this is to say that the art market is a bad thing.

The merger big money with government sanctioned and guaranteed control of the market is the worst thing to happen to a democracy... and there's a word for it.

Not exact matches

It's one of the worst things you can do if you are trying to get the attention of an investor (or maybe a journalist) by email or market a new product.

Startups based around a new idea sometimes get too sure of themselves, neglecting to keep a watch on the markets — competition isn't necessarily a bad thing, but you need to make sure you differentiate yourself in a way that makes your company seem like the more appealing service.

«I actually think that's the worst reason to automate things,» says Josh Sutton, global head of data and A.I. at marketing giant Publicis - Sapient.

Chipotle made things worse for itself by rotating which markets would be carnitas - free for six weeks at a time during the winter.

«The issue isn't particularly economic in terms of markets and it's not really the central banks... it's geopolitical and there's some bad things going on in the world and conventional analysis says things will be fine,» Schwarzman said at the Delivering Alpha conference, produced by CNBC and Institutional Investor.

As the markets have been indicating recently by sending shares tumbling, the iPad Mini could be a sign of bad things to come for Apple.

As proved time and again, vigorous trading to catch the market at just the right moment is one of the worst things an investor can do.

This isn't necessarily a bad thing given that China's middle class may be the biggest growth market there is.

One of the most encouraging things you want to see in the equities market is when a stock rallies in the face of bad news.

Crockett, who is bullish on SeaWorld, notes that even if things get much worse, the company has a portfolio of properties that, in its IPO filings, was valued at $ 5 billion; that's more than two times the current value of its market cap and debt.

Olen: The first thing you have to understand is we're dealing with thirty years of a powerful ideology that regulation is bad in a free market.

The growing de-professionalization of marketing has produced a few good things and a lot of bad ones, but among the worst is the loss of its institutional memory.

«When you are at the SEC you are part of a system where the worst thing you can do is undermine the markets.

But cash isn't such a bad thing in a rising rate environment as the yield pick up rather quickly on money market accounts or you can roll some of that over into higher yielding short - term bonds.

Just how bad would things have to get before the Harper government realizes further liberalizing the world's financial markets is not such a great idea?

We'll discuss how to manage volatility over the short - term and long - term, how to take advantage of both styles and why rising market volatility is not a bad thing.

However, I am stating the obvious, which is that bad things tend to happen in bad markets.

In Australia last year, things got so bad that gas on the domestic market was much costlier than exports to Japan.

Why buying CALLS at the bottom of a large decline in prices is the WORST thing you can do and why and what options to buy instead for massive profits as the market starts to rally...

Long term investors proclaim that market timing is a bad thing.

«After two years of denying that there was any problem in B.C.'s housing market, Premier Clark has taken steps that will do little to help the situation in the Lower Mainland, and will actually make things worse for people trying to find affordable housing in the rest of B.C.,» said Horgan.

It is a reminder that any market sell - offs of greater than 20 % must be bought immediately, blindly and without hesitation, regardless of how much worse it seems things may get.

Recognize that those are forecasts by the market that must recognize that if things get sufficiently bad, actions will be taken.

The market going down isn't necessarily a bad thing.

Many investors fear the type of market volatility we have seen in recent months, but it's not necessarily a bad thing — particularly for...

What's more, the PMO's own statement then ran through a full litany of all the bad things that lie ahead: decline in global stock markets, decline in commodity prices, slowing growth in China and emerging markets, and potential impacts on Canada's economy. Instead of boasting about Canada's successes under Conservative leadership, the PMO went to great lengths to show how bad things could get.

The worst thing about bear markets is the stress.

The caveat is, that if things go wrong e.g. big bad bear market and high inflation, then you'll need to put the brakes on later.

One thing that's markedly different about bond markets, however, is the inherent asymmetry of potential returns: The best a bond can do is pull to par, but the worst it can do is default — taking your capital investment with it.

Shorter runways are a bad idea because they pressure people to do things like falsely believe they have product / market fit which can be fatal.

(and to make things worse, macropru tools are not new and have been used for a while now, especially by emerging markets, with limited effectiveness — see chart below, taken from one of the seminar papers)

To make things worse, Canada's economy has been hit hard by falling oil prices, and investors remain wary of a Canadian housing market that has shown signs of becoming a bubble, as well as rising consumer debt rates.

«But definitely, policy makers have to be seen as not making things worse in terms of stimulating the stock market while the economy remains very weak.»

In this view of the world, markets stop falling on bad news because everyone who is still in accepts things are bad.

In our discussions with companies located there, we casino pa natet have found that while things aren't great in Europe, they don't appear as bad as the last several weeks and months of market action would seem to indicate.

We've seen some comments to that effect come across the tape in October, essentially sending a message that Fed policymakers are not going to let bad things happen in the markets.

«Allowing businesses to decide how to best put their profits back into the market is not a bad thing,» Pesce said.

Nevertheless, whether you deem it a good thing or a bad thing, you're staring in the face of a marketing campaign that is building on the theme of «the humble pope.»

And he had nothing to do with turning the stock market around from it's worst lows to new record highs because a commie hates the free market... so that can mean only one thing, Jesus has returned in the form of... The Invisible Hand of the Free Marmarket around from it's worst lows to new record highs because a commie hates the free market... so that can mean only one thing, Jesus has returned in the form of... The Invisible Hand of the Free Marmarket... so that can mean only one thing, Jesus has returned in the form of... The Invisible Hand of the Free MarketMarket!!!

«We have passed through the worst for dairy market fundamentals, but things are not likely to be as tight through the middle -LSB-...]

there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

maybe you don't understand that Wenger's words are simply an attempt to recover some of the market value that was lost due to the way they have mishandled his contract negotiations, which means that everyone, once again, knows that we have little to no leverage when it comes to negotiating a transfer... much like we did with RVP, when we sold the EPL trophy to ManU for less than $ 25 million... any reputable team with a sporting director would never have allowed this situation to occur again and if they had heads would roll... if handled correctly the worst case scenario would have seen us get a minimum of $ 65 million for a player of his ilk in the present economic climate and we could have used those funds to purchase the best available striker in the early days of the transfer window... just imagine what outsiders must think about the state of our team if all you did was read the headlines... sadly, things might just might be worse than they think

much like when a country can't divulge highly classified information publicly for obvious economic and military reasons, a professional soccer organization must keep certain things in - house so they don't devalue a player, expose a weakness, provide info that could give an opposing club leverage in future negotiations and / or give them vital intel regarding a future match, but when dishonesty becomes the norm the relationship between cub and fan will surely deteriorate... in our particular case, our club has done an absolutely atrocious job when it comes to cultivating a healthy and honest relationship with the media or their fans, which has contributed greatly to our lack of success in the transfer market... along with poor decisions involving weekly wages, we can't ever seem to get true market value for most of our outgoing players and other teams seem to squeeze every last cent out of us when we are looking to buy; why wouldn't they, when you go to the table with such a openly desperate and dysfunctional team like ours, you have all the leverage; made even worse by the fact that who wouldn't want to see our incredibly arrogant and thrifty manager squirm during the process... the real issue at this club is respect, a word that appears to be entirely lost on those within our hierarchy... this is the starting point from which all great relationships between club and supporters form... this doesn't mean that a team can't make mistakes along the way, that's just human nature, it's about how they chose to deal with these situations that will determine if this relationship flourishes or devolves..

We talked about FIFA's decision to bar Atletico Madrid and Real Madrid from making transfers over the next two seasons - spoiler alert, things aren't so bad when you're forced to dip out of the transfer market.

It's the fear of these things that make parents so susceptible to marketing, spending (often wasting) money on the latest gadgets and basically living our lives doing everything we can to prevent something bad, and encourage something good happening to the little people entrusted to us.

My first stop was to browse the market... for some reason I didn't snap a photo of the market but holy moly the market is really really grand and there were loads of things I really badly wanted... I'm trying to be frugal and break my bad spending habits so I went off to visit the cathedral instead of flashing the cash...