To say he doesn't agree with gay
marriage does no harm to those who desire that lifestyle because the option is still available to them and they can simply act in opposition.
Not exact matches
1) they just don't want gays
to marry, in which case they are bigots (every single one of them, the reason doesn't matter) or 2) they truly believe that gay
marriage will
harm society, in which case they may be well meaning, but they are fools (however well meaning)
And, either way, voting against gay
marriage is an attempt
to deny rights
to someone who can not possibly
do you any
harm.
Christians don't hate you any more than they hate someone who sleeps with others outside
marriage, gets a divorce, drinks
to excess, or smokes and
harms their body.
They enable one
to cheat in
marriage, or on examinations, or in business, or on income taxes, all the while appearing
to be a decent, patriotic, even God - fearing person who, like all sensible people, wants only his share of the good things of life and would never
do any
harm to anybody.
At the recent Ethics and Religious Liberties Commission's national conference on «The Gospel, Homosexuality, and the Future of
Marriage,» Albert Mohler correctly asserted that the divorce revolution has done more harm to marriage than same - sex marriage will
Marriage,» Albert Mohler correctly asserted that the divorce revolution has
done more
harm to marriage than same - sex marriage will
marriage than same - sex
marriage will
marriage will ever
do.
I was thinking about the question what
harm will gay
marriage do to me.
First, my post
does not refer
to arranged
marriages or forced
marriages or any of the terrible abuses of
marriage as an institution
to harm or enslave people in any culture throughout history.
While the Barnets find the swinging scene exciting at first, they soon decide it may be
doing more
harm than good
to their
marriage.
Her natural - law point of view (whatever western society has traditionally
done for the past couple of centuries is right — I exaggerate a little) leads her
to oppose same - sex
marriage and various other social positions that she has no actual evidence
to show are harmful, while ignoring a lot of the
harm done by existing practices.
I mean, if a couple is almost ready
to divorce, what
harm could
marriage mediation
do?
You
do this
to avoid a collision that could
harm your
marriage.
From yammerings on about the alleged
harms of «fatherless» households,
to the demanding of a «shared parental responsibility» post-divorce that they never undertook during
marriage when she begged them
to do so, these men epitomize the reason that for eons, societies have ended up engaging in wars, and atrocities of justice have never been quelched, and the reason that irrational male - mob - mentality, however ostensibly sophisticated, and however ostensibly educated, continues
to be the rule of the day.
I never advocate for divorce but if there is an irreparable
marriage which
does more
harm than good, divorce mediation is a healthy way
to address the need for separation that may have been ignored for too long.
...
To me, the answer is obvious: It is far better to take responsibility and confess rather than continuing the deception with the harm it does to the marriage until the spouse has to face the reality, investigate and really force the issu
To me, the answer is obvious: It is far better
to take responsibility and confess rather than continuing the deception with the harm it does to the marriage until the spouse has to face the reality, investigate and really force the issu
to take responsibility and confess rather than continuing the deception with the
harm it
does to the marriage until the spouse has to face the reality, investigate and really force the issu
to the
marriage until the spouse has
to face the reality, investigate and really force the issu
to face the reality, investigate and really force the issue.
We are reading from the same page or same paper as it were, specifically William J. Doherty's HOW THERAPISTS
HARM MARRIAGES AND WHAT WE CAN
DO ABOUT IT, an expanded version of his 1999 conference presentation How Therapy Can Be Hazardous
To Your Marital Health.
Marriage counselors are good people that want to help couples have better relationships, but the structure of marriage counseling — complaining about each other for an hour a week, waiting for the counselor to fix the other person, saying disrespectful things in front of a stranger — is dysfunctional and does a lot of harm, unfort
Marriage counselors are good people that want
to help couples have better relationships, but the structure of
marriage counseling — complaining about each other for an hour a week, waiting for the counselor to fix the other person, saying disrespectful things in front of a stranger — is dysfunctional and does a lot of harm, unfort
marriage counseling — complaining about each other for an hour a week, waiting for the counselor
to fix the other person, saying disrespectful things in front of a stranger — is dysfunctional and
does a lot of
harm, unfortunately.
The serendipitous approach
to custody reflected in the District's presumption
does not account for the real
harm done to relationships when
marriages or other familial unions dissolve, or when they never formed.
Your counselor can direct you on your path
to being free from such feelings so that they don't cause
harm later on in your
marriage.