Second, misleading claims could be «spun» from legitimate studies or from circumstance — for example, a 2008 study in Nature which showed that long - term greenhouse warming could be
masked by natural variability became a claim that «warming had stopped.»
Anthropogenic global warming inherently has decadal time scales and can be readily
masked by natural variability on short time scales.
Not exact matches
«This is important for regional planning, because it allows policymakers to identify places where climate change dominates the observed sea level rise and places where the climate change signal is
masked by shorter - term regional
variability caused
by natural ocean climate cycles.»
Some 0.4 C of temp rise should have robbed
natural variability of half or more of its flat stretches if CAGW is just
masked by it.
I don't consider myself to be an expert
by any means but in the few years I have been taking an interest in the subject of climate change I have tried to educate myself as much as possible about the various scientific arguments surrounding the subject, and one thing that has constantly been impressed upon my mind is that when there is a long term trend caused
by increasing GHG levels there will periods when it is
masked (or accentuated)
by short term
natural variability.
Or, conversely, they could recognize when the looming threat of global warming will be
masked — temporarily —
by natural variability.