Not exact matches
David Ullman, a postdoctoral researcher at Oregon
State University and lead author on the study, said there are two mechanisms through which ice sheets diminish — dynamically, from the jettisoning of icebergs at the fringes, or by a negative «surface
mass balance,» which compares the amount of snow accumulation relative to melting.
The researchers successfully correlated the crystallization
state in the alloy to local composition with novel
mass balance.
Schaefer et al.
state that there are four active volcanoes within the Southern Patagonian Icefield, which may be accounting for some additional basal melt, but that changes to
mass balance from a high geothermal heat flux can only account for a very small additional
mass loss.
Now, under normal circumstances, these two
states balance each other out, and your muscle
mass remains stable.
This paper briefly reviews the current
state of science regarding historical trends in hydrologic variables, including precipitation, runoff, tropospheric water vapor, soil moisture, glacier
mass balance, evaporation, evapotranspiration, and growing season length.
This rate exceeds the value required for steady -
state mass balance (∼ 7 - 8 m / yr), resulting in net thinning of 3 - 5 m / yr during the 2003 - 2010 period.»
«While the one - time computation of the momentum and
mass balance equations is readily justified for a snapshot in time, the use of a steady
state energy equation may be inaccurate, because thermomechanical transients induced by CHW persist over time scales of the order of one to three decades [Phillips et al. 2010].
The findings reinforce suggestions that strong positive ice — temperature feedbacks have emerged in the Arctic15, increasing the chances of further rapid warming and sea ice loss, and will probably affect polar ecosystems, ice - sheet
mass balance and human activities in the Arctic...» *** This is the heart of polar amplification and has very little to do with your
stated defintion of amplifying the effects of warming going on at lower latitudes.
The steady -
state form of the
mass -
balance model for CSTRs was used (ASTM, 1997).
Hence, having
stated my reasons for rejecting your «
mass balance assertion» I leave it to others here to evaluate those reasons and I withdraw from the debate.
To monitor this number of glaciers in the United
States is not feasible financially or logistically using standard
mass balance methods.
But the math he's put forth regarding
mass balances is quite straightforward and accurate — as I have
stated before I prefer to approach each point of discussion on it's own benefits, rather than accepting / rejecting everything based upon a label.
Yes, and the IPCC report also
states that deforestation contributed to atmospheric CO2 which is something your interpretation of
mass balance would make impossible.
Currently in the United
States there are four ongoing
mass balance programs.
It was enacted in order «to contribute to the attainment of a
balance of effort between Member
States in receiving and bearing the consequences of receiving displaced persons in the event of a
mass influx» (Preamble, recital 5).