The massive problem of global warming will be helped only by massive action.
Not exact matches
He says that during campaigns for the federal election held in July — after the
massive bleaching event
of earlier this year — both major political parties promised measures to protect the reef, but neither offered anything to address the «root cause
of the
problem, which is
global warming.»
Put another way, one can not expect a completely unregulated free marketplace to help responsibly address the
global warming problem unless there is a «price» assigned to emitting carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, by way
of (for example) a carbon «cap - and - auction» system or carbon tax: A small detail
of basic economics, apparently forgotten in ExxonMobil's
massive public campaign.
My investigations are increasingly proving that such data was flagged by non-NOAA agencies years ago, but NOAA declined to publish notice
of the faults until the
problem was publicized loudly and widely in my first «satellitegate» article, US Government in
Massive New
Global Warming Scandal — NOAA Disgraced.
«What we are doing in these tropical forests is really a
massive problem,» said Kurz.Bruce McCarl, an agricultural economist at Texas A&M; University, argues that simple changes in forest management and agricultural practices could lower the risk
of severe
global warming much more rapidly than proposed technological solutions like carbon sequestration.
Continued Birdsall, «Because the
problem of global warming and
massive environmental devastation appears to be lingering, however, the time may be right for the federal government to consider dealing with it again in some way.»
I am aware
of people making the argument that the big push by the nuclear industry for enormous government subsidies to find a
massive expansion
of nuclear power on the basis that nuclear power is «THE ANSWER» to
global warming is a fraud that dishonestly and cynically takes advantage
of growing concern about the very real
problem of global warming, and I make that argument myself (because even a quite large expansion
of nuclear electricity generation would have little effect on overall GHG emissions, at great cost, taking too long to achieve even that little effect, while misdirecting resources that could more effectively be applied elsewhere).