What, and the supposed green alternative to nuclear — wind power — doesn't require
massive public subsidy on an even greater scale?
Failure to do that amounts to
a massive public subsidy to fossil fuels, which is why they appear to be (but actually are not) «cheaper» than renewable energy.
Nuclear power doesn't compete with other energy sources anywhere because it receives
massive public subsidies in the form of liability limits enjoyed by no other energy source — not even close.
It has always, and everywhere, been absolutely dependent on
massive public subsidies.
So much of our health policy (including
massive public subsidies for the private health insurance industry) has served to reinforce rather than undermine the inverse care law (which was coined in 1971 and holds that «The availability of good medical care tends to vary inversely with the need for it in the population served.
Not exact matches
On Wednesday, March 22, 2017, Assemblymember Kavanagh, Chair of the Consumer Affairs and Protection Committee, held a press conference with Energy Chair Amy Paulin, Corporations Chair Jeffrey Dinowitz, Environmental Conservation Chair Steve Englebright, and other Assemblymembers to question the lack of transparency by the New York State
Public Service Commission (PSC) regarding
massive subsidies to a large corporation to operate upstate nuclear power plants that are set to take effect on April 1.
We stand by our original campaign —
massive billion dollar
public subsidies have
public responsibilities and the construction workforce deserves to be able to afford to live in the city in which they work.»
Massive subsidies, private and
public labor power, as well as entrepreneurial, government, and military capital flow into the generation, gathering, and analysis of data.
But Mike Childs, head of climate change at Friends of the Earth, insisted the expansion of nuclear power could not go ahead without some form of
public subsidy because of the
massive costs of construction.
Since the 1980s they have influenced governments to spend billions in
public funds and
subsidies to advance its corrupt science, along with subsidizing a
massive building program of solar panels and wind turbines providing so little electricity it actually has endangered lives in Europe and threatens the integrity of the U.S. electrical grid.
Stunt highlights that
massive amounts of
public money go to
subsidies for fossil fuels, rather than climate finance and renewables.
Who: Civil society will be staging a photo stunt to highlight the
massive amounts of
public money going to fossil fuel
subsidies while climate finance receives tiny amounts by comparison.