Benton, Michael J. «Finding the tree of life:
matching phylogenetic trees to the fossil record through the 20th century.»
Not exact matches
Regarding phlyogeny v.
phylogenetics, if what you meant to say was that phylogeny based on morphology has been shown to be false or is confounded by unreasonably high error rates in light of
phylogenetic techniques, you're patently incorrect as the prior
trees based on morphology have consistently, albeit not perfectly,
matched the
trees produced by genetic comparisons.
In addition, if a classification not directly
matching a specific family is found, it allows a
phylogenetic tree to be extracted from the application to determine the malware's possible ancestors.
Bowern counters that the
phylogenetic methods are actually ideal for investigating borrowing, because you can test models with different rates of borrowing and see how well the resulting
trees match known facts.
The maternal wolf sequence that contributed to these breeds has not been
matched across Eurasia [3] and its branch on the
phylogenetic tree is rooted in the same sequence as the 33,000 year - old Altai dog (not a direct ancestor).