Not exact matches
Now that the
documents are
in the FBI's
possession, the U.S. attorney's manual mandates the use of procedures that ensure privileged
materials are not improperly viewed, seized or retained.
Upon separation from employment with the Company or on demand by the Company during my employment, I will immediately deliver to the Company, and will not keep
in my
possession, recreate, or deliver to anyone else, any and all Company property, including, but not limited to, Company Confidential Information, Associated Third Party Confidential Information, as well as all devices and equipment belonging to the Company (including computers, handheld electronic devices, telephone equipment, and other electronic devices), Company credit cards, records, data, notes, notebooks, reports, files, proposals, lists, correspondence, specifications, drawings, blueprints, sketches,
materials, photographs, charts, any other
documents and property, and reproductions of any and all of the aforementioned items that were developed by me pursuant to my employment with the Company, obtained by me
in connection with my employment with the Company, or otherwise belonging to the Company, its successors, or assigns, including, without limitation, those records maintained pursuant to Section 3.C.
there must be clear evidence that the defendants have
in their
possession incriminating
documents and there is a real possibility that they may destroy such
material before any application inter partes can be made.
In dealing with the claimant's further request for an order that anyone who had read the privileged documents or was aware of their content should be removed from further involvement in the relevant FSA investigation, the judge held that, while the approach identified in the private law context to the question whether a lawyer in possession of privileged material should be restrained from acting is a useful guide, when the question arises in judicial review proceedings there will necessarily be a public law element in the underlying disput
In dealing with the claimant's further request for an order that anyone who had read the privileged
documents or was aware of their content should be removed from further involvement
in the relevant FSA investigation, the judge held that, while the approach identified in the private law context to the question whether a lawyer in possession of privileged material should be restrained from acting is a useful guide, when the question arises in judicial review proceedings there will necessarily be a public law element in the underlying disput
in the relevant FSA investigation, the judge held that, while the approach identified
in the private law context to the question whether a lawyer in possession of privileged material should be restrained from acting is a useful guide, when the question arises in judicial review proceedings there will necessarily be a public law element in the underlying disput
in the private law context to the question whether a lawyer
in possession of privileged material should be restrained from acting is a useful guide, when the question arises in judicial review proceedings there will necessarily be a public law element in the underlying disput
in possession of privileged
material should be restrained from acting is a useful guide, when the question arises
in judicial review proceedings there will necessarily be a public law element in the underlying disput
in judicial review proceedings there will necessarily be a public law element
in the underlying disput
in the underlying dispute.
To obtain the order, a plaintiff must show the Court that it has the makings of a strong case, that the damage to the plaintiff of the defendant's alleged misconduct is very serious, that there is convincing evidence that the defendant has
in its
possession incriminating
documents or items, and that there is a real possibility that the defendant may destroy such
material before discovery.
Under the new rules this test has been changed to «all
documents that are or have been
in a parties
possession or control that could be used by any party to prove or disprove a
material fact» and «all other
documents to which a party intends to refer at trial ``.
The test has been narrowed from
documents «relating to every matter
in question
in the action «to «all
documents that are or have been
in a parties
possession or control that could be used by any party to prove or disprove a
material fact» and «all other
documents to which a party intends to refer at trial ``.
84 (1) Forthwith after making his or her return, the returning officer shall arrange for shipment
in the prescribed manner to the Chief Electoral Officer of all envelopes returned to the returning officer by the deputy returning officers, and all
documents, papers, and
materials in his or her
possession relating to the conduct of the election.
A party may also submit to the tribunal requests to the other party to produce
documents («requests to produce»), containing: (i) a sufficiently detailed description of the requested
document or category of
documents; (ii) a statement of how the
document (s) is / are relevant to the case and
material to its outcome; and (iii) a statement that the
documents requested are not
in the
possession of the requesting party, are
in the
possession of the other party and why disclosing them would not be an unnecessary burden for the other party (Art 3 (3)-RRB-.