If you lose the case, you can seek permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal if there is
a material error of law in the First - tier Tribunal Judge's decision.
Not exact matches
But $ 130,00, or whatever it is, was a rounding
error in the 2016 campaign, so I kind
of roll my eyes about it somehow mattering in any
material way (other than enforcing the rule
of law, as you mentioned).
(B) deny the right
of any individual to vote in any Federal election because
of an
error or omission on any record or paper relating to any application, registration, or other act requisite to voting, if such
error or omission is not
material in determining whether such individual is qualified under State
law to vote in such election; or
Under no circumstances will the sites or the Chopra parties be liable to you for any loss or damages
of any kind that are directly or indirectly related to the sites, the
materials in the sites, the downloadable items, user content, your use or inability to use, or the performance
of the sites, any action taken in connection with an investigation by the sites or
law enforcement authorities regarding your use
of the sites, and action taken in connection with copyright or other intellectual property owners, any
errors or omission in the sites, technical operation, or any damage to any users computer, hardware, software, wireless devices, cellular phone, modem or other equipment or technology, including without limitation damage from any security breach or from any virus, bugs, tampering, fraud, scam,
error, omission, interruption, defect, delay in operation or transmission, computer line or network failure or any other technical or other malfunction, even if foreseeable or even if the sites or Chopra parties have been advised
of or should have known
of the possibility
of such damages, whether in an action
of contract, negligence, strict liability or tort.
A panel reviewing a decision
of a single judge under s. 680 (1) is to be guided by three principles: absent palpable and overriding
error, the review panel must show deference to the judge's findings
of fact; the review panel may intervene and substitute its decision for that
of the judge where it is satisfied the judge erred in
law or in principle, and the
error was
material to the outcome; in the absence
of legal
error, the review panel may intervene and substitute its decision for that
of the judge where it concludes the decision was clearly unwarranted.
Jackson J.A. would have dismissed the appeal on the basis
of lack
of jurisdiction, and also found that even if the trial judge had erred in
law the
error would not have had a
material bearing on the verdict.
Rather than equating the FSA's reliance on the privileged
material with the public
law concept
of taking into account an irrelevant matter, the judge held that it was more accurate to consider the
error as equivalent to a judicial or administrative body acting, in part, on inadmissible evidence.
My own attempt, by email, to suggest to the offending editor the
error of her ways (by quoting the statute and referring her to two resources), resulted in an angry rebuff, in which I was accused
of practicing
law without a license, told that my email would therefore be forwarded to the Attorney General and the paper's lawyer (who it was implied had okayed their statement denying Fair Use rights), and threatened with hearing from said lawyer, should I take any
of their
materials.
After a thorough review
of the
materials, the case
law, the applicable legislation and the submission
of counsel, I can find the arbitrator fell into
error when he found [the claimant] to be an insured person in accordance with the SABS.
Although Letts
Law has made reasonable efforts to ensure that the
materials contained on this site are accurate, it does not warrant or guarantee: the accuracy, currency or completeness
of the
materials; that the site will be available without interruption,
error or omission; that defects will be corrected; or that the website and the server (s) that make it available are free from viruses or harmful components.
[A] n appellate court may only intervene in the decision
of a trial judge if he or she erred in
law or made a
material error in the appreciation
of the facts.
A failure to do so is an
error of law because it constitutes a failure to take a
material matter into account.
To the fullest extent permitted by
law, neither Bond Solon staff,
material writers, presenters and trainers will be liable by reason
of breach
of contract, negligence or otherwise for any loss or damage (whether direct, indirect or consequential) occasioned to any person acting or omitting to act or refraining from acting upon the
material within Bond Solon Products, except to the extent that any such loss or damage does not exceed the price
of the Bond Solon product, arising from or connected with any
error or omission in the
material.
The Court concluded that while the case
law in British Columbia would have permitted an award
of spousal support to the appellant, given the length
of the parties» marriage and the expansion
of the meaning
of «need» in the family
law context, it was not a
material error on the part
of the trial judge to refuse support in the circumstances
of that case.