Not exact matches
Charter
school students in grades 3 through 8 perform better
than we would expect, based on the performance of comparable
students in traditional public schools, on both the
math and reading portions of New York's statewide achievement tests.
Based on the findings presented here, the typical
student in Michigan charter
schools gains more learning
in a year
than his [
traditional public school (TPS)-RSB- counterparts, amounting to about two months of additional gains
in reading and
math.
Known as the CREDO study, it evaluated
student progress on
math tests
in half the nation's five thousand charter
schools and concluded that 17 percent were superior to a matched
traditional public school; 37 percent were worse
than the
public school; and the remaining 46 percent had academic gains no different from that of a similar
public school.
A 2017 multi-state review of voucher programs by Carnoy with the Economic Policy Institute found that
students in voucher programs scored significantly lower
than traditional public school students on reading and
math tests and found no significant effect of vouchers leading to improved
public school performance.
In math, charter school students had «stronger growth» than traditional public school students in 12 states, and weaker growth in 13 state
In math, charter
school students had «stronger growth»
than traditional public school students in 12 states, and weaker growth in 13 state
in 12 states, and weaker growth
in 13 state
in 13 states.
«
In her blog, Weingarten states, «A well - regarded Stanford University study found that charter school students were doing only slightly better in reading than students in traditional public schools, but at the same time doing slightly worse in math.&raqu
In her blog, Weingarten states, «A well - regarded Stanford University study found that charter
school students were doing only slightly better
in reading than students in traditional public schools, but at the same time doing slightly worse in math.&raqu
in reading
than students in traditional public schools, but at the same time doing slightly worse in math.&raqu
in traditional public schools, but at the same time doing slightly worse
in math.&raqu
in math.»
* Charter middle
schools that hold lotteries are neither more nor less successful
than traditional public schools in improving
student achievement
in reading and
math.
CREDO found that, on average,
students in New Jersey charter
schools are making greater gains
in both reading and
math than their counterparts
in traditional public schools.
A study conducted at Stanford University's Hoover Institution presents evidence that
students in only 17 percent of charter
school show greater improvement
in math and reading
than students in similar
traditional public schools, whereas 37 percent, deliver learning results that are significantly worse
than the
student would have realized had they remained
in public schools.
A 2011 report (PDF) by Stanford's Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO), using a different methodology, indicated
students in Pennsylvania's online charter
schools «have significantly smaller gains
in reading and
math than those of their
traditional public school peers.»
Nationally, urban charter
schools on average achieved significantly greater
student success
in both
math and reading
than traditional public schools, said the study, which covered the academic years 2006 - 07 to 2011 - 12.
A 2015 study on urban charter
schools by the Center for Research on Education Outcomes at Stanford University found that D.C. charter
students are learning the equivalent of 96 more days
in math and 70 more days
in reading
than their peers
in traditional public schools.
Students at Bridge run PSL public schools learned significantly more than students at traditional public schools, nearly twice as much in reading and more than twice as much i
Students at Bridge run PSL
public schools learned significantly more
than students at traditional public schools, nearly twice as much in reading and more than twice as much i
students at
traditional public schools, nearly twice as much
in reading and more
than twice as much
in maths.
The most recent charter
school study, from Stanford University's Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO), finds that academic growth among Boston charter
school students is more
than four times that of their
traditional public school peers
in English and more
than six times greater
in math.
An analysis of 2011 - 12 MEAP results by the Michigan Association of
Public School Academies concludes that black urban students perform better in charter schools than in traditional public schools in both math and read
Public School Academies concludes that black urban
students perform better
in charter
schools than in traditional public schools in both math and read
public schools in both
math and reading...
Students in the District's
traditional public schools scored higher
than ever on the city's
math and reading tests this year, also posting the largest single - year gain since 2008, according to test results released Tuesday.
A well - regarded Stanford University study found that charter
school students were doing only slightly better
in reading
than students in traditional public schools, but at the same time doing slightly worse
in math.
The most careful, comprehensive study of virtual charter
schools, from Stanford's Center for Research on Education Outcomes, found that virtual charter
students achieved the equivalent of 180 fewer days of learning
in math and 72 fewer days of learning
in reading
than students in traditional public schools.