Sentences with phrase «mathematical understanding of»

But most real estate investors have a mathematical understanding of what cashflow is but not a conceptual one.

It is a distinctive feature of the modern mathematical understanding of the Navier - Stokes equations that not all problems are going to be solvable with any accuracy at all.

Most importantly, they are prepared to take best advantage of educational technologies for fostering the mathematical understanding of their students both now and in the future.

Godsoe used probability theory to formally connect observations of where species actually occur to mathematical understanding of species ecology.

«A breakthrough on the mathematical understanding of Einstein's equations.»

The change in outlook which led to modern physics and its mathematics thus might, extended to biology, lead to a new, more flexible, more temporalist paradigm (and perhaps to a new mathematical understanding of biology).

Not exact matches

The other key mathematical driver to understanding our business model is that we invest in < 1 % of the deals that we see every year.

Beyond thinking a million - pound payout is a matter of basic necessity, he is deeply insecure in his professional standing, confessing he no longer understands the «immensely complicated mathematical formulae» that drive his industry.

Though savvy investors, like Shakespeare's Antonio, have long understood the benefits of diversification, it was not until the 1950s when an academic named Harry Markowitz introduced research on what he called modern portfolio theory that people were able to understand diversification in an objective, mathematical sense.

Do you know the mathematical impossibility that even one of these could randomly come into existance?Let alone all of the building blocks required for just a single simple cell to come together to form any type of living thing?There sure should be some blobs of fossilized transitions if evolution could happen.You people are real smart why don't you quit bashing Christians and quit believing the garbage you have been fed, and look up the evidence put forth by the Creation Research people.They have in fact proven creation down to a cellular level.Unlike evolution scientists who have no answers, but cleverly devised fables.Evolution is not even a very good fairy tale.Even if I didn't believe in God, Evolution is such a fools explanation of the origin of man that it takes just that to even consider it true.I understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you to love your sin and hatred of the one true God.

What I really don't understand is how you ignore all the other sign in the bible that are to tell of the end of days and believe a man that has come up with a mathematical equation!

Superstring theory has a mathematical structure so sophisticated that, after a quarter of a century of study by hundreds of the world's most brilliant physicists and mathematicians, it is still not fully understood.

But we may, I think, conclude with Errol Harris (AT 74) that from the Hegelian perspective, the philosophical shortcomings of classical logic extend to mathematical logic as well, and that as logic of the understanding, both deal with the «abstract concept of class or aggregate,» and are both inextricably connected with a metaphysics of externally related particulars that lose themselves in a «spurious infinite,» and with a concomitant mechanical cosmology.

This means that Cantor's «mathematical paradise» should be understood as follows: Let there be a mathematical universe such that sets constitutive of it have the defining feature that a part of the set is equal to the whole of the set.

But if we understand Whitehead in light of the mathematical model, then his identification of the extensive continuum with the most general limitation upon general potentiality, the fundamental determination of order in this epoch (PR 103, 148), does not represent confusion but straightforward metaphysics.

But we understand and judge Whitehead to be a realist, and so he must have an analysis of creative advance which gets around the problems that arise when time and space are allowed to be isomorphic with the mathematical continuum, the problem with which is that its series are dense rather than discrete.

Mathematics is the most powerful technique for the understanding of pattern and for the analysis of the interrelationship of patterns... In the next 2,000 years the overwhelming novelty in human thought will be the dominance of mathematical understanding... Applied mathematics is the transference of this study to other examples of the realization of these patterns.

In my scientific suppositions I have proposed that their were once immeasurably unknown amounts of Big Bangs spread out uniformly upon the great vastness of spatial relativisms that is Nothingness itself... Such a theory regarding unknowable amounts of Big Bangs spread out uniformly upon the great vastness of continual Nothingness just may well be the missing mathematical linkage for explaining the hindering smallness of celestial issues that has confounded many astrophysicists who endeavor to seek a mathematical formulary in order to rationalize a theoretical understanding of the celestial cosmos...

Alongside and dependent on the rich development of aesthetic, scientific, and mathematical distancing arose other modes of understanding man, which were called forth initially by the practical exigencies of political life.

«39 Since few people read Lowe's entire 1949 article in which the details of his argument are really presented, I will select a few of the key contrasts Lowe reprinted in Understanding Whitehead, which contains an abridgement of the 1949 article, in an effort to show that Gunter has really answered them already rendering Whitehead not so much Bergson's mathematical alter ego, 40 as something more approaching his philosophical blood brother 41 According to Lowe, however, «it is fatal to the understanding of Whitehead's constructive metaphysical effort to define it in BergUnderstanding Whitehead, which contains an abridgement of the 1949 article, in an effort to show that Gunter has really answered them already rendering Whitehead not so much Bergson's mathematical alter ego, 40 as something more approaching his philosophical blood brother 41 According to Lowe, however, «it is fatal to the understanding of Whitehead's constructive metaphysical effort to define it in Bergunderstanding of Whitehead's constructive metaphysical effort to define it in Bergsonian terms.

One might as well try to say ducks know nothing of water as impugn Bergson's mathematical understanding.

Neither man, however, had what Plato, also enthusiastic about mathematics, did have, a sagacious understanding of the difference between mathematical concepts and concrete actualities.

In his 1959 essay entitled «My Present View of the World,» he argued that the fundamental entities are discrete but overlapping «events,» that the fundamental entities of mathematical physics are «constructions composed of events,» and that entities like conscious minds and «selves» are best understood as collections of events «connected with each other by memory - chains backward and forwards.

As Craig Dykstra has observed, Farley tends to limit the scope of his understanding of «cognition» to linguistic and logical — mathematical realms.

Nature is in fact always much richer and more complex than our imaginative and mathematical models, and we unduly shrivel our understanding of the cosmos if we equate it in a simple way with our scientific schemes.

In his exposition of Psalm 90 he even used the daring metaphor that the subject of faith was a mathematical point, so far was he from regarding faith as a subjective experience through which man's understanding of himself is illuminated, and so exclusively should faith be defined in reference to its object, the extra se of the historic Christ.

In that revolutionary address he unified geometry and physics into a single set of axioms by symbolic logic.2 While the memoir does not comment theologically, it does propose a theory of intersection points, or interpoints, which in its mathematical abstraction suggests a lucid and stimulating model for projecting Whitehead's understanding of God's relation to space.

I understand that given the mathematical impossibility of hundreds of thousands of working parts randomly / accidently being formed into the first, simple reproducing life form, intelligent design not only makes a lot of sense it's an absolute requirement.

Science as it is usually understood is simply incapable of addressing the question of the possible purpose of nature since the material it deals with has already been abstracted out of the «qualitative» realm of value and placed in that of the merely quantifiable, subject only to mathematical calculation.

The modern secular man, who probably can not understand mathematical physics but has heard of the Principle of Relativity and the Quantum Theory, does not realize how much this kind of thinking penetrates his thought processes.

Their resistance may be motivated by a fear that nature will slip out of the control of our mechanical and mathematical models for understanding physical reality, or it may be occasioned simply by our innate passion for order and intelligibility.

Another way of understanding «chance» is the mathematical.

The «Scientific Revolution» is so named because the success of its mathematical, experimental and developmental methodology realigned not just Aristotelian cosmology but also his understanding of the «nature» of things.

Acknowledgment of the existence of this rational dimension of reality is vital to the possibility of understanding the origin of human mathematical powers.

These «two poles» involve respectively the «presupposition of] the mathematical structure of matter, its intrinsic rationality, which makes it possible to understand how matter works and use it efficiently», which wonderfully «correspond ^ with] our spirit», and our own experimental activation of «nature's capacity to be exploited for our purposes».

In this Biffi depicted Anselm's perspective as, contrary to much modern emphasis, grasping that «reality as a whole is much greater than we grasp through simple natural understanding, substantiated solely by sensory experience, inductive and deductive reasoning, mathematical calculation -LSB-...] faith not only is not separable from reason, and does not harm it, but is even the greatest and highest exercise of our intellectual faculty.»

■ Bishop Nicholas of Oresme (1323 - 1382), Bishop of Lisieux who as a mathematician discovered how to combine exponents and developed graphs of mathematical functions and as a physicist explained the motion of the Sun by the rotation of the Earth and developed a more rigorous understanding of acceleration and inertia.

We are therefore able to understand that some of the physical quantities are born out of the more qualitative mathematical structures of sense experience as a straightforward quantification thereof.

There can never be an absolutely final translation of the New Testament, for (1) we do not know with mathematical precision what its authors meant or how their readers understood them, and (2) our own language changes from age to age and words acquire and lose meanings.

This is too complex an issue to discuss here, but I would submit that if understanding rather than prediction is the goal of science, models can not be replaced by predictive mathematical formalisms.

Far more important is to give your children an understanding of mathematical concepts which will enable them to use their calculators intelligently.

The latter can be found in more successful teaching programs — like the one at Waldorf School of Baltimore — that are based on inquiry - based learning, and on students» self - evaluation of their understanding of mathematical formulas and theories.

A number of recent news stories have had a similar kind of message: animals viscerally understand certain mathematical operations better than humans do.

Shostak also brought up a less frightening but perhaps more existentially dreadful possibility about some future first contact: what if we finally hear from aliens broadcasting their presence as sentient beings, and the big announcement is their understanding of well - known mathematical phenomena such as the Fibonacci sequence.

As one can classify the shapes of objects based on the mathematical concept called topology, an exotic phase of quantum matter can be understood with underlying topology and symmetry in physical materials.

Applying new math, Kristina Crona, an American University assistant professor who researches in the area of mathematical biology, and her colleagues show how ranking pathogen mutants can help scientists understand how mutants evolve to resist drug treatments.

The author offers a comprehensive account of his perspective on our understanding of the physical behavior of the universe and the mathematical theory that underlies it.

Your online traces are helping fuel a revolution in the understanding of human behaviour — one that's revealing the mathematical laws of our lives

Lipton and others are still trying to understand the details of Deolalikar's proof, but it essentially works by applying a type of P equation to an NP problem, then showing that it won't work for deeply mathematical reasons.

The solution to the Kirchhoff - Plateau problem not only contributes to the understanding of energy minimizing mathematical shapes, but can also be applied to biological systems.