As such, the advice and correspondence given to clients by claims consultancies may well have to be disclosed in the event that
the matter comes to court, unless the claims consultant has engaged a practising solicitor or barrister to provide legal advice.
... The ethical issue should not be the likelihood of
the matter coming to court but rather the likelihood that the public would lose confidence in the court being able to adjudicate the matter impartially.
The matter came to Court, the evidence of Mr Davidson was preferred and the court determined the level of and entitlement to profit broadly along the lines stated by Mr Davidson.
Not exact matches
The
matter came to a head on Friday morning when, according
to Russian news agency TASS, Telegram asked Moscow's Tagansky
court to delay hearings.
«The money
comes from interests that have
matters before the
courts, and they'd like
to have those
matters settled in their favor.»
Ultimately, the testimony of Levandowski in the
matter at hand could
come down
to whether the case is heard in
court or in arbitration, with the latter scenario being the more likely instance in which the embattled engineer would appear.
I said it
to hotair already, but I will expand it a bit for you: what is evidence for some is not accepted by everyone; just as in a
court case, some jurors are convinced with very little evidence while some people can not be convinced of something no
matter how much evidence there is... much of this
comes from how you were raised and your own personal world view, for many people God does not fit into their world view so whatever evidence there is they close their eyes and say, «No, I don't believe that!»
«[Religious leaders] essentially decided during the past twenty years that people could fend for themselves on
matters of personal morality while the churches joined the «struggle»
to establish social «rights» whose imprimatur
comes from the
courts, America's unique bishopric.»
According
to the standard account of the
matter, the power of judicial review — that is, the authority of the federal judiciary
to invalidate acts of Congress and the President when they are deemed
to be unconstitutional —
came to be entrenched in our law by the acceptance, tacit or otherwise, of the Supreme
Court's ruling in the 1803 case of Marbury v. Madison.
To make matters worse, Boston had home - court advantage and the # 1 seed, but the Cavs came to Boston and thrashed the Celtics from the star
To make
matters worse, Boston had home -
court advantage and the # 1 seed, but the Cavs
came to Boston and thrashed the Celtics from the star
to Boston and thrashed the Celtics from the start.
I am of the thinking that on the very day Brexit
comes into effect, and except where it has formally been agreed during the negotiations on certain issues and
matters to benefit both the UK and the EU, the UK should no longer be subjected
to comply or obey any standing Laws passed before and later by the EU
court of justuce after Brexit has
come into effect.
I am of the thinking that on the very day Brexit
comes to effect, and except where it has been formally agreed during the Brexit negotiations on certain issues and
matters to the benefit of both the UK and the EU, the UK should no longer be subjected
to comply or obey any standing Laws passed or passed after Brexit by the EU
court of justice.
In an ideal scenario, a mother and father would
come to an agreement together, without battling the
matter out in
court.
Arguing the
matter before the
court, Mr Dame said Exton Cubic Group Limited had no right
to come before the
court since they had no Mineral rights that the
court should protect.
Atolagbe appealed that the
matter be stood down pending the arrival of Mr. Jacob in
Court to come and shed more light on the absence of Dasuki.
But Daudu argued that since the
court is yet
to assume jurisdiction
to hear the
matter, such application should not have
come up at this stage.
McDonald was in the CapTon studio this week for an interview on an unrelated
matter (a hearing he had held on PTSD with his fellow vet, Sen. Lee Zeldin), and seemed unconcerned about the possibility that he might face a primary this fall (or, June 26, if the Senate GOP ever
comes around
to the Assembly Democrats» way of thinking on moving the primary date
to conincide with the
court - ordered House and US Senate contests).
It, therefore,
comes as a surprise that INEC, which was a party
to the
matter, can not advise political parties on the right course
to take but, instead, continues
to encourage politicians
to embark on illegal actions through active participation of its officials, who are sent
to observe such illegal primaries, whereas the apex
court in the land has ruled on such
matter.
Mr. Woyome had
come out publicly
to say he felt he was being persecuted by the Supreme
Court in the
matter of the judgement debt.
'' But then, even if I were not the valid candidate, the right thing for the
court was
to declare whosoever
came second in the PDP Primaries as the authentic candidate and thereby replacing me as it is purely a party
matter.
He disclosed that no
matter what happens
to the party, he and his colleagues would remain committed
to its ideals and vision, adding, «we believe very strongly that the judgement of the Supreme
Court which is
coming sometime next week will unite the party more than dividing us.»
Subtle attempts by the two parties
to settle the
matter out of
court came to no avail.
His decision also
came only hours after Edwards had asked the U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals
to drop the
matter — despite Landry's initial objections.
While you can pursue legal action, that can be costly and time consuming, and a bank or collection agency will not wait for a
court case
to settle the
matter before
coming after you.
I have had several military members
come to me
to help them address investigations from the Navy and the Army, an example is being called
to represent a rape victim who was being harassed by a military officer who was being
court - martialed, and have been providing legal commentary
to the media regarding
matters that range from Homeland Security
to National Security
to military law.
[a] tax measure such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which is, according
to the referring
court's description of its history and purpose, intended
to prevent excessive capital flow towards the Netherlands Antilles and
to counter the appeal of that OCT as a tax haven,
comes under the tax carve - out clause cited above and remains, consequently, outside the scope of application of Article 47 (1) of the [Seventh] OCT Decision, provided it pursues that objective in an effective and proportionate manner, which is a
matter for the referring
court to assess.
The good news there is the field is sufficiently complex
to thoroughly exercise your gray
matter (see, for example, David Fischer's analysis of the LinkLine litigation
to be argued shortly before the Supreme
Court), which means you're not just getting a job, but getting smarter too (case in point: before becoming an Internet marketer for lawyers I worked at Kaye Scholer and frequently saw Milton Handler, a name partner and guru of the antitrust bar, still
coming to work well into his 90's).
The
matter then
came before the Supreme
Court of Canada, which was asked to address an important legal question: in cases where the support terms of an agreement have been incorporated into a court order, what is the proper approach by a court to an application to
Court of Canada, which was asked
to address an important legal question: in cases where the support terms of an agreement have been incorporated into a
court order, what is the proper approach by a court to an application to
court order, what is the proper approach by a
court to an application to
court to an application
to vary?
Nonetheless, Master Robertson goes on
to indicate that, if this
matter had
come before a Provincial
Court judge, the Provincial
Court judge would have authority
to hear the application
to set aside the order and schedule a re-hearing based on rule 9.15 of the Alberta Rules of
Court, which allow the setting aside of an order made without notice or following a hearing.
It does not say that a Tenancy Dispute Officer has the same power and authority as a Provincial
Court judge when it
comes to residential tenancy
matters.
Addressing concerns that mandatory Trial Management Conferences add unnecessary time and expense
to litigation, Practice Direction 36
comes into force on September 4 which will allow parties
to BC Supreme
Court Civil and Family
matters to apply
to waive TMC's.
Part of the problem for participatory fathers, though, is that their role in the family is essentially a revocable parole, in that
courts that have not adapted
to the new realities: judges can — and all too frequently do — turn them into Mr. Every - Other - Weekend, no
matter how extensive their former role in the family, results which seem
to be
coming from both the traditionalist and modern progressive sides of the bench.
In recent months there has been a noticeable increase in the number of prospective clients contacting our firm who went
to court alone and have felt confused, unsupported and let down by the outcome as they did not know what their options were, how best
to resolve
matters, or, when it
came down
to it, how
to argue their case.
Presiding tribunals and
courts, in Ontario and elsewhere, are likely
to be wary about carving out exceptions
to human rights legislation, and an individual's position or title in the workplace is unlikely
to be the end of a judge or adjudicator's analysis when it
comes to such
matters.
This controversial issue
came to the forefront after the Wisconsin Supreme
Court's 3 - 3 split decision, In the
Matter of Judicial Disciplinary Proceedings of Michael J. Gableman.
One of the most sensational
matters to come to the Women's
Court involved an 18 - year - old maid.
In the Redknapp case, the procedure itself prevented the
court from
coming to a detailed judgment on some
matters.
The
matter came to be decided by the
Court of appeal in R v T (Child: Doli incapax)[2008] EWCA Crim 815, [2008] All ER (D) 215 (Apr).
When this case
comes to the High
Court, the
Court may want
to consider issuing sanctions — not against defense attorney Brass, but against state's attorney Brunker for bringing this
matter to begin with.
Why would an attorney
come to court on a
matter that did not involve them unless they were acting as an attorney?
Whilst the Divisional
Court found that the Crown
Court was the most appropriate forum for resolving disclosure disputes, it has
to be said that the SFO did not
come out of this
matter particularly well.
One only needs
to consider the United States Supreme
Court and the landmark decisions which
come to mind and which are not in the area of commercial law but rather concern
matters that affect all citizens.
In addition
to the institutional or parliamentary purists and those who feared the sort of innovation associated with the American Supreme
Court, there were still other premiers who simply felt that duly elected legislatures were better positioned than appointed judges when it
came to the
matter of protecting individual and community rights.
Expert witnesses, such as doctors, who
come to court to testify, do so in order
to give evidence and opinion on complicated
matters outside of the realm of the general knowledge of judges and juries.
Such representations will
come back
to haunt you if an employee's perception of «good faith» and «non-harassment» do not coincide with yours, or, for that
matter, a
court's.
And this morning, Peter Lattman of the Wall Street Journal Law Blog had the scoop on a «hot off the presses» ruling by federal district
court Judge Lewis Kaplan, who found that that prosecutors violated the constitutional rights of a group of former KPMG partners in pressuring the firm not
to advance them legal fees (I originally blogged about the
matter here in the context of how much we should expect corporations
to stand up for customer or employee rights when government
comes knocking on the corporate door).
Our principal instructions
come through from solicitors or the
courts, often relating
to contractual
matters between contractor and building owners.
The national Action Committee on Access
to Justice in Civil and Family
Matters notes in its final report that only about 6.5 % of legal problems ever make it
to court, but it is unlikely in the extreme that so many of the people with high school diplomas or less are bundled into the 93.5 % who manage
to resolve their legal issues outside of
court, especially when we know that for people with low incomes, legal issues tend not
come one at a time but cluster and multiply into other areas of the law.
The
matter came before Mrs Justice Hogg between 29 - 31 July 2014 and it was held that the English
Court could not exercise jurisdiction over B as she was not habitually resident here from the date of her removal
to Pakistan.
LAWYERS FOR POOR AMERICANS IS VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THE VERY REAL POSSIBILITY THAT COMMISSIONER DAVID J. COWAN OF SANTA MONICA CA
COURT HOUSE IS A CLOSET GAY MAN OR FOR THAT
MATTER ~ OPEN GAY MAN, THAT HAS SOMEHOW BEEN GIVEN
COURT CASES INVOLVING FAMILY CHILD CUSTODY ISSUES AND IS THE NEWEST FACE OF WHAT IS
TO COME IN AMERICAN FAMILY
COURTS ACROSS AMERICA?????????????????