Sentences with phrase «matter if the claims»

It doesn't matter if the claim has merit, defense coverage is part of liability coverage.

Does it matter if the claim is factually inaccurate or at a minimum not supported by observable evidence?

The law has being clarified in the following Court of Appeal case which stands for the proposition that parties must disclose any prior legal advice on the same subject matter if they claim duress without legal advice (2015 BCCA 52).

Not exact matches

If Force.com, Heroku, and App Cloud — Salesforce's attempt to bridge the two — are as great as claimed, why would Salesforce (or Benioff personally, for that matter) weigh a stake in a rival?

Under the pleadings standard set forth by the Supreme Court in Ashcroft v. Iqbal, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, which if accepted as true, states a «claim to relief that is plausible on its face.»

If Gender Mattered: A Case Study of Inuit Women, Land Claims and the Voisey's Bay Nickel Project: http://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/SW21-39-1999E.pdf

If Gender Mattered: A Case Study of Inuit Women, Land Claims and the Voisey's Bay Nickel Project:

If one were to ask a resident of Alberta which province has the more persuasive claim in this debate, it wouldn't much matter where they were.

Among other things, Hogan is claiming that Gawker violated the tort of «publication of private facts,» which prohibits people from publishing private facts about others, even if they are true, unless the facts are related to matters of «public concern.»

The last claim matters because if the $ 130,000 payment was coordinated with the Trump campaign, it could run afoul of campaign finance laws.

And he could be serious about his faith, as well: In reply to Garry Wills» claim that «being Catholic always mattered more to him than being conservative,» Buckley responded, «If he meant he has a higher loyalty to God than to civil society, then the answer is obvious: God has to be preeminent.»

I already responded to this issue... and even if I accepted that there was a first cause (which I don't)... it wouldn't matter, you a make a whole baseless claim beyond that.

IF by claiming that a determinist feels «His actions «matter» and are important.»

The reason a politician's «religion» matters (and it does even if you are an atheist voter), is because so many religious people claim to have a direct line to god and allow that belief to inform their decision making.

My experts can beat up your experts, but in the final analysis, what matters is evidence; if you can't provide it, we're justified in doubting fantastic claims.

@Chrism — «It's not any matter of convenience, it is well and proper for any Christian to question if someone else does something and claims it to be a Christian action when it is obviously not.»

If the characteristic mark of hermeneutical theology is its interpretive stance, especially in regard to texts — both the classic text of the Judeo - Christian tradition (the Hebrew Scriptures and the New Testament) and the exemplary theologies that build on the classic text — then heuristic theology is also interpretive, for it claims that its successful unconventional metaphors are not only in continuity with the paradigmatic events and their significance expressed in this classic text but are also appropriate expressions of these matters for the present time.

If you are only matter only, than you should not say such things as, «I didn't do that» when neurologists uses electrical impulses to make you move a body part — no matter what the graduate student Harris claims.

If his supporters want to claim it doesn't matter, then tell HIM that, not the people exposing his hypocrisy.

Yes, I understand that quantum entanglement is not actually showing anything moving faster than the speed of light, or moving at all for that matter, but it does show how little we truly understand about how both space - time and physics and quantum physics behave so if we are making a claim based on a predictor we don't yet understand then there is virtually no chance we might be correct in our hypothesis.

And if you can't site your scientific evidence to this end, then the fact that you claim to be a scientist has no bearing on your opinion in this matter.

Even if he claimed to be a christian, does it matter?

If an individual claimed that he was chosen by God and could not sin no matter how heinous his actions, we would commit him for observation.

This is of course your opinion and you are ent - i - tled to it, but if you really believe that perhaps you should investigate the matter yourself instead of taking other people's opinion as gospel the way you claim anyone who believes in a diety does...

For Revelation in the ultimate resort and in principle claims the whole of reality as the possible subject - matter of its affirmations, even if only sub respectu salutis (in relation to salvation), and from this point of view even events and realities which are accessible to secular experience fall within its material scope.

... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself.

I would feel better if I could claim that it was, after all, only a matter of blunderbuss pronouns, that today my language would be gender inclusive.

I do not claim to be wise on spiritual matters, but I encourage all true believers to follow Chist Jesus by doing what He commanded us to do, if we love Him.

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

Mirosal... you are not doing great with any answers... as a matter of fact you arent answering any questions... you are asking them... and why is it so important to claim that you are atheist... this is false pride... something that is evident in any unatural and foolish human group... its almost as if people hide behind this false pride to make them feel better for things they know in their own heart are foolish... and what need is there for order if there is no GOD... because if no one cared about their soul... then this might become the dog eat dog world that you people are hoping for

For that matter, if I make the claim that there will be infinite reward for everyone who gives me ten percent of their income for the rest of their lives and infinite punishment for anyone who does not, my claim has equal standing with either of those religions under Pascale's Wager and you'd better start paying up if you want to hedge your bets.

And as for the Syllabus of Errors, not one article of it mentions democracy, workers» unions or newspapers, and if it rejects «pluralism» (not a concept anyone at the time was familiar with) it is mostly in the sense that any religion which claims to be true, rather than a matter of opinion, rejects it.

Christianity only really matters if the specific claims it makes about reality are correct.

============== @No Truth, Just Claims «Reasonable people don't endorse ANY state sponsered belief, no matter if it is theistic OR atheistic.»

If matters of ultimate religious and moral truth are declared to be essentially private — of concern only to individuals and not to society at large — then their claim of public truth is sharply undermined.

I know one thing for sure, for myself, I will never take anyone seriously who claims they are hearing voices, it doesn't matter if it was 2000 years ago or one week ago.

Claiming that we falsify reality if we divide it into mind and matter, into living and non-living, he said: «consciousness (which we take to include thought, feeling, desire, will etc.) is to be comprehended in terms of the implicate order, along with reality as a whole».7 Thus the randomness of sub-atomic elements may be linked with the creative freedom exercised by human consciousness.

As a matter of practice, if a food can claim that it was grown in or produced in a country, it can also claim to have been made there.

Health claims aside 50 extra grams of sugar a day are still 50 grams of sugar no matter if you get them from honey, syrup, or eating them by the spoonful out of the sugar bag.

A new contract does appear more a matter of when and not if, and speculation claims a win this weekend would lead to an announcement of a new contract.

I can only hope that this attempt is taken more seriously than the largely muted and clearly unsuccessful protests of late last season... although the plane writing escapade brought some much - needed attention to the matter, it failed to resonate with fence - sitters and those who had just recently fell off the Wenger truck... without a big enough showing of support the whole endeavor appeared relatively weak and poorly organized, especially to the major media outlets, whose involvement could have significantly changed what was to follow... but I get it, few wanted to turn on their club, let alone make a public display of their discord... problem is, they are preying on that vulnerability, in fact, their counting on you to keep your thoughts to yourself... who are you to tell these fat cats how to steal your money... they have worked long and hard to pull the wool over your eyes... they even went so far as to pay enormous sums of cash to your once beloved professor to be their corporate spokesmodel so that the whole thing would be more palatable... eventually the club made it appear as if this was simply a relatively small fringe group of highly radicalized supporters, which allowed the pro-Wenger element inside the club hierarchy to claim victory following the FA Cup win... unfortunately what has happened to this club can't be solved by FA Cups or a few players coming in, the very culture of this club needs to be changed and that starts at the top... in order to change the unhealthy and dysfunctional narrative that has absorbed this club we need to remove everyone who presently occupies a position of power... only then can we get back to the business of playing championship caliber football, which should always be the number one priority of this organization... on an important side note, one of the most devastating mistakes made in the final days of this hectic and poorly planned transfer window didn't have to do with the big name players like Sanchez or Lemar, but the fact that they failed to secure Jadon Sancho, who might even start for Dortmund this season... I think they might seriously regret this oversight... instead of spending so much time, energy and manpower pretending that they were desperately trying to make big moves, they once again lost the plot due to their all too familiar tunnel vision

there is some suggestion that wenger is backtracking on his fervent stance regarding what players would be staying at the club for the remainder of the season... some might deduce that this is all part of a much bigger, more elaborate plan... by shifting the blame wenger is attempting to, not so slyly, flip the narrative... by doing so he hopes to evoke empathy from his most ardent supporters, while attempting to rally any fence - sitters, whose faith was waning unless a more legitimate agent of blame emerges... unfortunately, and incredibly insulting to the fans, when wenger attempts to spin a tale and / or tries to eat his own words, he doesn't seem to play it all the way through in his head, so invariably gaping holes emerge... say we believed his version of the truth, would that not make him either an incredibly well - paid custodian of destruction or a spineless jellyfish because what manager worth his weight in salt would stay at a club that didn't give him final say after 20 years of supposed «success»... no matter the answer, neither bodes well for us... how ironic, in a way, since many pundits claim this team has lacked a «spine» for some years now... so whether we win, lose or draw on Sunday is frankly immaterial, as the problems will remain, and although it will be easier to digest if we left the Pool with 3 points, it might just be the worst result for the betterment of this club... a fact that both breaks my heart and baffles the mind

No matter how good a football team is, and after shipping three goals to Leicester City despite claiming all three points on Friday I am not sure we can say that Arsenal are all that good just yet, the Premier League is one of the toughest trophies in the world to win and if there are teams and squads better than you then it is almost certain you will not win it.

While this can be atrributed to his lack of full match fitness, as i have no doubt Wenger will claim if queried on this matter, his substitution coming immediately after the goal made me wonder whether Arsene made the substitution out of frustration.

dude, if you had any claims to knowing a thing about football or any credibility when it comes to talking the game you lose it every time you play article on here... mind you it's not because you are completely clueless, matter of fact I reckon if you actually care t analyse things without been emotional you can make a lot of sense.....

The side do have the little matter of the FA Cup final, but even if United claim the historic trophy against Crystal Palace no elite European football next season could spell the end of the former Netherlands boss.

Not that it probably matters, and it isn't the point, but... I don't know if there are any pizza out there that claim 1/2 cup vegetable serving... most are 1/8 cup to 1/4 cup.

While advocates of solitary infant sleeping arrangements have claimed any number of benefits of infant sleeping alone, the truth o the matter is, few, if any, of these supposed benefits have been shown to be true through scientific studies.

But if JCOPE does decide to investigate the matter, then it would have subpoena power to review internal documents and communications in the matter, as well as possibly determine the extent to which Silver knew of the claims.

He also found it ridiculous that Mr Naabu kept silent on the matter till date if he indeed had any evidence to substantiate his claims.