Sentences with phrase «matter in it»

It was claiming, in principle, that human beings are part of the mechanical world system, that they can be explained like everything else in terms of matter in motion.

However, not everything that might justifiably be treated as subject matter in theological study can be selected for study.

In short, the world can be understood exhaustively in terms of matter in motion.

We may unravel some of the confusion by going back to the roots of the matter in the Old Testament.

But this may be putting the matter in the extreme.

Utilitarian views matter in these technological days, when religious ethics often seem insufficient.

Leslie Dewart8 criticizes both the Hegelian and Marxistic views of history in terms of his theory of the development of truth by saying that to reduce history to man or to reduce it to God would be nothing else but the self - actualization of an original potentiality: matter in the first case, Absolute Spirit in the second.

You have not contributed to the discussion you have framed the matter in a way that condemns people who are not guilty.

A study from 2014 confirmed the link between pornography use and decreased brain matter in the areas of motivation and decision making, impaired impulse control and desensitization to sexual reward.

George Orwell caught much of the truth of the matter in his observation that certain ideas are so outrageous that only an intellectual could believe them.

The Economist put the matter in sharp relief: «Much in modern economics is taken on trust.

And rather than reviving the old debates about the nature of Being itself, wouldn't it be better to think about matter in terms of the incarnate Christ?

Professor Elmer Homrighausen, of the Princeton Seminary, himself inclined in the neo-orthodox direction, wrote about this matter in The Christian Century (July 18, 1956):

In this sense matter in its mathematically expressible functionality and interactions is indeed blind when considered in itself.

And as we noted earlier, some «materialist» thinkers are prepared to include spiritual phenomena within their definition of matter in order to maintain their materialist stanceand exclude transcendence from their world view.

We shall have the root of the matter in us; we shall have come to recognize that in the history leading up to our Lord, and with the coming of Jesus himself, there were released into the world, and that in what we may rightly call an unprecedented fashion, energies for good which have changed the lives of men and through them the face of nature too, and that these same energies are still available whenever men turn, in faith and with utter self - surrender, to the Lord of all life.

If you're not, it's mythology and doen't matter in the least.

that the monads will pour into that place whither they are irrevocably destined by the total maturing of all things and the implacable irreversibility of the whole history of the World — some of them spiritualized matter in the limitless fulfillment of an eternal communion, and others materialized spirit in the conscious agonies of an interminable decomposition.

If, for example, nature is seen as a great machine made up of lesser machines ultimately composed of particles of matter in law - abiding motion, then the cell also will be understood as being a law - abiding machine.

If the work of creation is seen as an evolutionary process, then existence of matter is the necessary precondition for the appearance, on earth, of spirit: elsewhere Pere Teilhard de Chardin speaks of matter in more exact language as the «matrix of spirit»: that in which life emerges and is supported, not the active principle from which it takes its rise.

No matter in which direction they turn, the dignity of God impels them to be agents of reconciliation and empowers them for self - control.

This universe had an start, a point at which all matter in the universe and time itself was created, out of nothing (where nothing is the «absence of everything»).

This is a relatively simple matter in connection with our common sense.

Even his most complex theory which seems to involve matter in the universe disappearing permanently in various places, which he even challenged to his opponents to prove wrong, was pretty much proven wrong by a group of determined scientists.

This means that, instead of analyzing events into matter in motion, we analyze matter and motion in terms of the field of events.

I long for definitive, concrete evidence that I matter in this world and am on the right track.

We see a procession of the faithful lined up in historical order, or maybe not, because order does not matter in the heavenly realm.

When we have an ordinary sort of night, you say, «We made walking to Walmart into a fantastic date» to remind that these ordinary nights matter in a love story.

St Augustine had much to say on this matter in De sancta virginitate where he insists that chaste virginity is the closest imitation of Christ open to us in this life.

But as long as one is committed to substantialist thinking, one assumes that in the ultimate analysis the event can be understood in terms of matter in motion — atoms moving around in the void.

Yet in creating human beings with bodies formed from the unfolding of matter in cosmic development, God the Son committed himself from all eternity to become Man according to the Father's will.

It will matter in the world, more than you can imagine or dream perhaps, a ripple effect going on and on, touching the other shore, but it will also matter because you matter.

Does thou wish I had put forth my matter in another dress?

Critical analysis helps to put the matter in the right perspective.

Me, even me, in my little life in western Canada, I matter in the global story of how love wins.

This is what defines all the potentialities and the actualities of matter in cosmic development.

When we follow the scientists who get rid of «God,» we end up in a mechanistic world, composed exclusively of matter in motion.

Why should the churches be seen as hypocritical for dismissing someone who is saying «I'm going to live like you don't matter in my life and I don't hold the same beliefs you do»?

On the other hand, a true - believing Gnostic, oriented to a transcendental state of being, would have to see the computer as the means the Demiurge uses to imprison humans more securely in the world of time and matter in which the rigged environment frustrates any attempt at transcendental relief.

It's just my attempt to list some of the things that might matter in the discussion.

adjective bearing upon or connected with the matter in hand; pertinent: as in, your comment has absolutely no relevance to the article.

I am no mathematician nor quantum physicist but it does not take a rocket scientist to know that nothingness holds all mannerisms of every kind of matter in its nothing embodiment!

Heres a headline for you - CNN decides to stop promoting mindless religious oriented fluff pieces in their key news stories, and instead reports on things that actually matter in the world.

I actually believe that marriage needs to be public and people need to vow into it in front of those who matter to them — it's not just a private matter in front of the Lord.

The infinite Universe supports the view that all particles considered to be energy have mass or substance; that there is one fundamental particle which accounts for all the diverse forms of matter in the Universe.

There are opinions that I have that I can discuss, argue about, and reconsider, but many of those opinions don't really matter in the long, long run.

It therefor only refutes a very limited part of the «it's a negative stance», and in no way addresses the parts that matter in the scope of this discussion.

Or i could point out that the big bang is the biggest joke ever told... That even the top physicists can't figure out how their own theory could work, not to mention the fact that for it to work they would need for the Universe to break the fundamental laws we understand as true since the beginning i.e. (No matter in the Universe can be created nor destroyed, you can only change it's state (solid to liquid, liquid to gas etc.).

Is God made up of all matter in this Universe?

Science can't account for this type of consciousness merely from the interaction of physical matter in the brain.