Sentences with phrase «matter is in court»

If your matter is in court, you can ask for the Office of the Children's Lawyer («OCL») to be appointed.

A statement issued by the organisation, which is also a centre for information gathering said although the matter is in court it is expedient for government to aid in the...

An appeal would stay the judge's ruling that the state may not deduct any school aid due the city while the matter is in court.

I said it before that the matter is in the Court and what happened in River state that brought Amaechi to power as Governor may happen in Ondo.

Second question: Even though this matter is in court and I don't want to go into it, the fact of the matter is that the reply, when we took the matter to court, was that the government was not involved in the demolition and they don't know who demolished the house.

A statement issued by the organisation, which is also a centre for information gathering said although the matter is in court it is expedient for government to aid in the legal processes to exonerate itself from the bad press.

Not exact matches

But the truth of the matter is that defending your patents in federal court is extremely expensive.

«But every assault should be taken care of in a court of law, and to accuse — no matter who it is, a man or a woman — without evidence, it's damaging and it's unfair.»

In doing so, the court failed to address a recurring question, one that's often a matter of life and death for police officers and the public.

At the very least, controversial emails or other communications from high - profile or powerful people that are disclosed publicly — no matter how they are obtained — are considered in the court of public opinion where no rules of admissibility apply.

Maybe at the end of the day these emails will have the most significant impact on individual dealings with the people who wrote them, even in matters that have not yet registered with the broader public and even in matters will never be considered in court.

In exchange for their severance packages, employees would be required to be on call for two years, making themselves available for meetings, court deposition and phone calls to discuss matters related to their previous work with the company.

The legislative push come against a backdrop of the expanding legalization of same - sex marriage, which is now allowed in 36 states and in limbo in a 37th — Alabama, where there have been contradicting state and federal court orders on the matter.

The federal court hearing the matter struck down the agreement and is allowing the lawsuits to go forward in court.

The original complaint, which had been a fairly straightforward matter of Citi's allegedly misleading its customers into buying mortgage securities, has morphed into a public spectacle in which both the SEC and Citi now stand accused of failing to provide relevant disclosures (in the case of the SEC, to the court and the public).

Almost no matter what happens with this lawsuit, it's actually a brilliant win - win situation for both the giant In - N - Out and the tiny Down N» Out — before they even set foot in courIn - N - Out and the tiny Down N» Out — before they even set foot in courin court.

He said their attempts to move the case from the state court in Los Angeles where Daniels filed her claim to a federal court is because it would increase the chances that the matter will be decided in private arbitration, «thus hiding the truth from the public.»

CFPB director Richard Cordray announced that rights of groups of consumers to a day in court is «a cherished tenet of our justice system» and «that no one, no matter how big or how powerful, should escape accountability if they break the law.»

In an emailed statement, James Fitz - Morris, a spokesman for Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada, said Canada is committed to righting historical wrongs committed against Indigenous people and that the federal government is working to resolve the matter out of court, as it did with the Sixties Scoop survivors» class action.

This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because there is complete diversity of citizenship between Plaintiff and Defendant, and the amount in controversy exceeds $ 75,000, exclusive of costs and interests.

Under the pleadings standard set forth by the Supreme Court in Ashcroft v. Iqbal, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, which if accepted as true, states a «claim to relief that is plausible on its face.»

He said their attempts to move the case from the state court in Los Angeles where Daniels filed her claim to a federal court is because that would increase the chances the matter be decided in private arbitration, «thus hiding the truth from the public.»

«In narrowing the scope of the summons, we are pleased that the Court acknowledged the privacy rights at stake in this matter.&raquIn narrowing the scope of the summons, we are pleased that the Court acknowledged the privacy rights at stake in this matter.&raquin this matter.»

One might have thought that that would be the end of the matter, but instead Burnaby commenced this action in the Supreme Court of British Columbia seeking a declaration (at para 13) «that the National Energy Board does not have the constitutional jurisdiction to issue an order to the City of Burnaby that directs or limits the City of Burnaby in the enforcement of its bylaws.»

In addition to asking a court to mandate that Uber implement fingerprint background checks — a measure the company has vehemently opposed — the plaintiffs are asking a judge to order Uber to perform national criminal background checks on its drivers every six months, and to bar registered sex offenders or people with rape or assault convictions from driving for Uber no matter how long ago it was, along with other measures.

The probate case involving the Parkland school shooter's dead mother took a strange turn Thursday when a hearing in the matter was abruptly canceled and documents in the court file showed the only asset is an old car — a 2010 Kia.

Julie Allison, an attorney for the home, said in a statement Friday, «We will be addressing these matters in court, and we look forward to sharing all of the evidence that has been obtained and that will be considered in a fair and impartial manner by the judge.»

It should certainly be interesting, if the RECBC does decide to carry this thru to the nth degree with this example of government meddling, when some buyer, (that can't use his licensee Sister) decides it is a draconian measure for the Government of BC to dictate whom said buyer may choose to write his contract to purchase a property in The Province and brings the matter before the courts.

«They are not attempting to remove this case to federal court in order to increase their changes that the matter will be decided in private arbitration,» he wrote.

Ultimately, the testimony of Levandowski in the matter at hand could come down to whether the case is heard in court or in arbitration, with the latter scenario being the more likely instance in which the embattled engineer would appear.

However, having such a provision and enforcing it are different matters altogether, and fallen executives often negotiate their departure in private rather than exposing the issue to the public scrutiny of a court fight.

On March 6, 2018, Judge Jack B. Weinstein of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York ruled that virtual currencies are commodities under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and therefore subject to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's (CFTC) anti-fraud and anti-manipulation enforcement authority.1 Granting the CFTC's request for a preliminary injunction against the defendants who allegedly engaged in deception and fraud involving virtual currency spot markets, Judge Weinstein noted that «[u] ntil Congress clarifies the matter,» the CFTC has «concurrent authority» along with other state and federal administrative agencies and civil and criminal courts over transactions in virtual currency.2

But Fortress and Dune argue in court papers that, as per the terms of their joint - venture agreement, Eichner is required to settle the matter in arbitration — and only after a default is declared.

I said it to hotair already, but I will expand it a bit for you: what is evidence for some is not accepted by everyone; just as in a court case, some jurors are convinced with very little evidence while some people can not be convinced of something no matter how much evidence there is... much of this comes from how you were raised and your own personal world view, for many people God does not fit into their world view so whatever evidence there is they close their eyes and say, «No, I don't believe that!»

It's been reported that thousands of Muslims settle civil matters in Sharia courts each year in the UK.

A few simple sentences explaining why the court in Dresden was Catholic while Saxony was Lutheran (because in 1697 the elector of Saxony, Friedrich August, opportunistically converted to Catholicism in order to be elected king of Poland), the differences between Calvinist and Lutheran realms, why Leipzig was a commercial center, and other such matters would have been helpful.

Were a person to have violated a court order directing the return of a runaway slave when Dred Scott was the law, would a genuinely held belief that a slave was a human person and not an article of property be a matter the Court could not consider in deciding whether that person was guilty of a criminal contempt chcourt order directing the return of a runaway slave when Dred Scott was the law, would a genuinely held belief that a slave was a human person and not an article of property be a matter the Court could not consider in deciding whether that person was guilty of a criminal contempt chCourt could not consider in deciding whether that person was guilty of a criminal contempt charge?

Trump has previously said he would be willing to take the matter to the US Supreme Court in order to get the travel ban passed, a measure his administration argues is necessary of national security.

Here the Supreme Court began to set in legal concrete the notion that sexual morals and patterns of family life are matters of private choice or taste, not matters of public concern in which the state has a legitimate interest.

The New York Times: Irish Poised to Revisit Abortion Law Abortion is back on the agenda in Ireland after a European Court of Human Rights ruling last year found the state in violation of its own Constitution on the matter.

In the matter of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and the Washington Post, we stipulate that compassion be shown to Joan Biskupic, a Post writer who reported on Scalia's April 9 speech in Mississippi on religion and public lifIn the matter of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and the Washington Post, we stipulate that compassion be shown to Joan Biskupic, a Post writer who reported on Scalia's April 9 speech in Mississippi on religion and public lifin Mississippi on religion and public life.

In legislative politics and, for that matter, in Court doctrine, nothing is forever — an observation that is, as I understand it, at the heart of Mr. Harris» argumenIn legislative politics and, for that matter, in Court doctrine, nothing is forever — an observation that is, as I understand it, at the heart of Mr. Harris» argumenin Court doctrine, nothing is forever — an observation that is, as I understand it, at the heart of Mr. Harris» argument.

And as Islamic law forbids a Muslim woman from marrying a non-Muslim man (although it permits a Muslim man to marry a non-Muslim woman), her marriage was not a marriage at all in Sudan, where matters of personal and family law are controlled by religious courts.

In the case of involuntary commitments, in some states any adult relative or friend can file a request (with the court which handles such matters) that the allegedly mentally ill person be committeIn the case of involuntary commitments, in some states any adult relative or friend can file a request (with the court which handles such matters) that the allegedly mentally ill person be committein some states any adult relative or friend can file a request (with the court which handles such matters) that the allegedly mentally ill person be committed.

However, intent certainly does matter to the courts and an accidental killing such as the one in your first scenario would be prosecuted differently than the second scenario of a planned killing in cold blood.

One of the most explicit discussions of the matter is by Professor Hartshorne, who in a short but stimulating essay entitled «The Unity of Man and The Unity of Nature» (Included in The Logic of Perfection (Open Court Press, La Salle, Ind., 1962.)

Ever since 1947, when the Supreme Court first applied the First Amendment's establishment clause to the states in Everson v. Board of Education, the court has held that government must be neutral on matters of reliCourt first applied the First Amendment's establishment clause to the states in Everson v. Board of Education, the court has held that government must be neutral on matters of relicourt has held that government must be neutral on matters of religion.

In Christian Echoes National Ministry, Inc. v. U.S., the Tenth Circuit Court addressed what the Walz decision had sidestepped, and held that «tax exemption is a privilege, a matter of grace rather than a right.»

That's why the Catholic Church doesn't just oppose gaay marriage, we do not believe in the possibility of it and that will not ever change no matter what the courts say.

This Court was specifically mandated to «proceed and act and give relief on principles and rules which, in the opinion of the said Court, shall be as nearly as may be conformable to the principles and rules on which the ecclesiastical courts of Ireland have heretofore acted and given relief» [and] the [Irish] Constitution has inherited and amended this former jurisprudence in matrimonial matters.