The other groups to which I have referred are more
clearly matters of emphasis rather than efforts to shape the whole of the Wesleyan heritage.
Perhaps the greatest difference in this form of evangelical theology and that of Wesley is
a matter of emphasis.
In many ways it is
a matter of emphasis.
That difference is mostly
a matter of emphasis, however, and not something fundamental.
And we may be wrong either as a matter of fact (maybe God doesn't want women ordained or infants baptized) or as
a matter of emphasis (perhaps we over emphasize the sovereignty of God in salvation).
According to Pannenberg, the skewing of WCC directions is not only
a matter of emphasis but also of structure.
Today it is only
a matter of emphasis.
It's all
a matter of emphasis.
But I think it's all
a matter of emphasis, really.
Like many things in life, it's
a matter of emphasis, a question of sensibility.
It is
a matter of emphasis.
The two flows coexist, of course — I'm just musing about
a matter of emphasis and, maybe, importance.
The difference seems to be
a matter of emphasis.