In addition, they will investigate the reason for nature's preference for
matter over antimatter, and will probe matter as it existed during the first instants of the Universe.
The CP LEAR experiment is already collecting good quality data with antiprotons, hoping to understand the mechanism, known as charge - parity (CP) violation, which has lead to the domination of
matter over antimatter in the Universe.
A non-zero charge would have meant that the antiproton in the nucleus and the positron buzzing around it have slightly different charges, which would violate the rules of the Standard Model of particle physics and possibly provide an explanation for the dominance of
matter over antimatter in the universe.
The standard model of particle theory successfully describes every fundamental particle and force observed in laboratories, yet fails to explain properties of the universe such as the existence of dark matter, the amount of dark energy, and the preponderance of
matter over antimatter.
Yet our Universe is overwhelmingly made of matter, and so something long ago must have favoured
matter over antimatter.
In the early universe, the differences might have created a preponderance of
matter over antimatter that would account for the universe's current composition.
Other experiments have found evidence of CP symmetry violations in more exotic types of particles, such as kaons or B mesons, but they aren't enough by themselves to explain the dominance of
matter over antimatter.
«The excess of
matter over antimatter is one of the most compelling mysteries in science,» said John Wilkerson of ORNL and the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
It might, for instance, explain the preponderance of
matter over antimatter in the cosmos.
Physicists think that primordial processes produced a tiny excess of
matter over antimatter.
A similar boost could await cosmologists, who are asking whether two of the biggest mysteries in physics — what dark matter is made of and why there was an excess of
matter over antimatter in the early universe — have a common origin.
But why would nature favor
matter over antimatter?
Not only could this «sterile» neutrino be the stuff of dark matter, thought to make up the bulk of our universe, it might also help to explain how an excess of
matter over antimatter arose in our universe.
Not exact matches
«Since we know how many photons there are compared with ordinary
matter, that tells us that most of the
matter and
antimatter did annihilate, and only a little tiny bit of
matter was left
over,» says David Hitlin, a physicist at Caltech and the founding director of the BaBar team.
The recently commissioned MicroBooNE experiment at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory has reached a major milestone: It detected its first neutrinos on Oct. 15, marking the beginning of detailed studies of these fundamental particles whose properties could be linked to dark
matter,
matter's dominance
over antimatter in the universe and the evolution of the entire cosmos since the Big Bang.
But this does a poor job of explaining why
matter triumphed
over antimatter in the moments after the big bang.
To find out more about the elusive particles and their potential links to cosmic evolution, invisible dark
matter and
matter's dominance
over antimatter in the universe, the Department of Energy's SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory is taking on key roles in four neutrino experiments: EXO, DUNE, MicroBooNE and ICARUS.
Now, the odd behavior of the Bs meson could be giving us some clues about why
matter won out
over antimatter.
This differentiation is critical to the universe's existence —
matter and
antimatter annihilate when they come in contact, so somewhere along the line,
matter must have had an edge
over its counterpart to form the cosmos we inhabit today.
«Their work provides a framework for understanding why
matter vastly dominates
over antimatter in our universe.»
Whether the hypothetical CP violation would fully explain
matter's dominance
over antimatter depends on the new physics that gave rise to it.
But for some unknown reason, scientists have said, there was a tiny bit more
matter than
antimatter left
over after the Big Bang, so after the initial annihilation, the leftover
matter became all the things we see in the universe now.
Any discrepancies between hydrogen and antihydrogen might help explain why
matter won out
over antimatter in our observable universe.
Work on so - called symmetry breaking helped to shape the Standard Model and explain why
matter won out
over antimatter
For more on
antimatter: Antimatter of Fact: Collider Generates Most Massive Antinucleus Yet Fermilab Finds New Mechanism for Matter's Dominance over Antimatter Why Did Matter Beat Out A
antimatter:
Antimatter of Fact: Collider Generates Most Massive Antinucleus Yet Fermilab Finds New Mechanism for Matter's Dominance over Antimatter Why Did Matter Beat Out A
Antimatter of Fact: Collider Generates Most Massive Antinucleus Yet Fermilab Finds New Mechanism for
Matter's Dominance
over Antimatter Why Did Matter Beat Out A
Antimatter Why Did
Matter Beat Out
AntimatterAntimatter?
That would link a tenuous but intriguing idea to one of the biggest mysteries in physics: why
matter prevails
over antimatter in the universe.
Further observations of this behaviour may shed light on how
matter came to dominate
over antimatter in the universe.
This hypothetical particle might help to explain why certain weak - force reactions dominate
over others and why there is more
matter in the universe than
antimatter.
Physicists at CERN hope that the detection and subsequent study of new particles could provide answers to some of the most fundamental questions of the universe, such as why there is an abundance of
matter and lack of
antimatter, and the make - up of mysterious «dark
matter,» which is believed to constitute
over 84 percent of the
matter in the cosmos.