This is not how
matters appear in public discussions.
Not exact matches
This is Buffett's third, recent
public involvement
in matters that
appear ethically gray.
I can only hope that this attempt is taken more seriously than the largely muted and clearly unsuccessful protests of late last season... although the plane writing escapade brought some much - needed attention to the
matter, it failed to resonate with fence - sitters and those who had just recently fell off the Wenger truck... without a big enough showing of support the whole endeavor
appeared relatively weak and poorly organized, especially to the major media outlets, whose involvement could have significantly changed what was to follow... but I get it, few wanted to turn on their club, let alone make a
public display of their discord... problem is, they are preying on that vulnerability,
in fact, their counting on you to keep your thoughts to yourself... who are you to tell these fat cats how to steal your money... they have worked long and hard to pull the wool over your eyes... they even went so far as to pay enormous sums of cash to your once beloved professor to be their corporate spokesmodel so that the whole thing would be more palatable... eventually the club made it
appear as if this was simply a relatively small fringe group of highly radicalized supporters, which allowed the pro-Wenger element inside the club hierarchy to claim victory following the FA Cup win... unfortunately what has happened to this club can't be solved by FA Cups or a few players coming
in, the very culture of this club needs to be changed and that starts at the top...
in order to change the unhealthy and dysfunctional narrative that has absorbed this club we need to remove everyone who presently occupies a position of power... only then can we get back to the business of playing championship caliber football, which should always be the number one priority of this organization... on an important side note, one of the most devastating mistakes made
in the final days of this hectic and poorly planned transfer window didn't have to do with the big name players like Sanchez or Lemar, but the fact that they failed to secure Jadon Sancho, who might even start for Dortmund this season... I think they might seriously regret this oversight... instead of spending so much time, energy and manpower pretending that they were desperately trying to make big moves, they once again lost the plot due to their all too familiar tunnel vision
The discussion became so heated that Thomas de Maizière decided to
appear in Parliament on 31 January to make a
public statement on the
matter, reiterating the need to buy armed UAVs: «[Germany] can not keep the stagecoach while others are developing the railway,» he declared.
And it
appears that this time, Cuomo might be listening: Though the governor has yet to make any
public remarks on the
matter, both the Times's Emma Fitzsimmons and NY1's Zack Fink reported via Twitter that Cuomo is looking at how to implement some form of congestion pricing
in the city, with the proposal to (potentially) be discussed when the New York State legislature reconvenes for its next session
in January.
The Lawyers
in an official letter addressed to members of the 5 - member ad - hoc committee tasked to investigate the alleged scandal, said: «we have been instructed by our client to convey to you, which we hereby do, his desire to
appear before your committee to be heard on the above allegation and to provide evidence that would assist your Committee to reach a fair and true conclusion on this substantially important
matter of
public interest.»
New York's
Public Officers Law bans former government officials from
appearing before the state agencies where they worked for two years
in a paid capacity, and also says state employees can not ever practice,
appear before or ever even «communicate» with those agencies on
matters over which they were «directly concerned» during their state employment, or which were under their «active consideration.»
The chances of any measure for IE reform passing
in the final days
appears to be slim, however, as lawmakers are yet to come to an agreement on
matters generally considered to be lower - hanging fruit, such as the first passage of a constitutional amendment to require the forfeiting of pension benefits from
public officials convicted of corruption.
It could also force several key figures to
appear in public to answer questions on the
matter, thereby raising the prospect of ongoing coverage just when the key players were hoping it would die down.
I've only
appeared on this blog (or
in public for that
matter) without bangs a handful of times
in the past many years, and every time I do I'm always surprised to find people don't really recognize me.
While discipline policies vary across schools, districts, and states — and as the nation's largest school district the New York City
public schools are likely more bureaucratized and formalized
in matters of school discipline than smaller districts — the scale, scope, and level of complexity of the legal regulations affecting day - to - day school practices
appear quite formidable.
Establishing a common set of standards across states is a new policy proposal that emerged as a
public issue only
in 2011, and it
appears as if many citizens have yet to decide where they stand on the
matter.
In cases where complaints from the public serve as the evidentiary basis for the director to prepare a petition, at least one of the complainants or his or her designee in the matter must appear and testify at the hearing or the complaint shall be dismisse
In cases where complaints from the
public serve as the evidentiary basis for the director to prepare a petition, at least one of the complainants or his or her designee
in the matter must appear and testify at the hearing or the complaint shall be dismisse
in the
matter must
appear and testify at the hearing or the complaint shall be dismissed.
The introduction of new types of art, for instance - such as Performance, Happenings and Installations - along with new subject -
matter - including things like dead sharks, dying flies, huge ice - sculptures, crowds of nude bodies, buildings that
appear to be
in motion, a collection of 35,000 terracotta figures, islands wrapped
in pink polypropylene fabric, painted bodies, spooky projected imagery on
public buildings, and so on - have provided spectators with a range of new (sometimes shocking) experiences.
The situation doesn't
appear to something that would be likely to have happened that way, much like the second half of the situation
in the above - mentioned Gelbspan timeline situation, where he (as a private citizen whose only
public appearance at that time
in the
matter was a solitary article he co-authored which briefly turned him into a skeptic) claimed an Assistant Attorney General allowed him to influence an official hearing
in a major way.
Caroline has
appeared at
public inquiries and
in the High Court and Court of Appeal on planning
matters.
Although there has been some call for specific laws addressing the
matter, it
appears that the strongest restriction is a recommendation from Health Canada that you not smoke marijuana
in public.
A paralegal license allows the paralegal to provide legal advice and services to members of the
public in certain types of
matters and
appear before certain lower level courts and administrative tribunals.
a) recognition and enforcement of the decision is manifestly incompatible with the
public policy («ordre
public») of the State addressed; b) the decision was obtained by fraud
in connection with a
matter of procedure; c) proceedings between the same parties and having the same purpose are pending before an authority of the State addressed and those proceedings were the first to be instituted; d) the decision is incompatible with a decision rendered between the same parties and having the same purpose, either
in the State addressed or
in another State, provided that this latter decision fulfils the conditions necessary for its recognition and enforcement
in the State addressed; e)
in a case where the respondent has neither
appeared nor was represented
in proceedings
in the State of origin -
Recognizing that an individual
appearing in public does retain an interest
in controlling her or his information, the Supreme Court found that
in the context of the picket line the restrictions of PIPA were to «impede the formulation and expression of views on
matters of significant
public interest and importance».
By s 11 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981, where a court allowed a name or other
matter to be withheld from the
public in proceedings before the court, the court might give such directions prohibiting the publication of that name or
matter in connection with the proceedings as
appear to the court to be necessary for the purpose for which it was so withheld.
Section 11 gave the judge the power to prohibit the publication of the «name or
matter» that he allowed to be withheld from the
public by his
in camera order «
in connection with the proceedings»,
in so far as it
appeared to him to be necessary for the purpose for which the information was withheld.
Any member of the
public can
appear during the days the board meets to be heard on
matters regarding any item
in the recommended budget, or for the inclusion of additional items.
84 DOS 99
Matter of DOS v. Woodland - failure to
appear at hearing; jurisdiction; mortgage applications; failure to pay judgment; ex parte hearing may proceeding upon proof of proper service; DOS has jurisdiction over respondents for acts of misconduct which occurred during licensure even though the licenses expired on their own terms; DOS fails its burden of proof to establish broker failed to obtain signature on agency disclosure form; DOS fails its burden of proof to establish that a broker has an obligation to «pre-qualify» a potential purchaser; broker breached duty to deal honestly with the
public when advised purchaser he would assist
in obtaining financing and failed to do so; DOS fails its burden of proof that broker wrongfully failed to hold a $ 500.00 deposit
in escrow as deposit was remitted to seller with the permission of buyer; failure to pay judgment without a showing that broker is unable to do so is a demonstration of untrustworthiness; no action to be taken for reapplication for broker's license until payment of $ 1,000.00 fine and proof of satisfaction of judgment