Sentences with phrase «matters brought to the courts»

They intended for all matters brought to the courts to be considered by a jury of independent, free individuals, who were not beholden to the courts or government, and who would freely render a verdict based on justice even if in direct opposition to the courts and the law.

Not exact matches

It should certainly be interesting, if the RECBC does decide to carry this thru to the nth degree with this example of government meddling, when some buyer, (that can't use his licensee Sister) decides it is a draconian measure for the Government of BC to dictate whom said buyer may choose to write his contract to purchase a property in The Province and brings the matter before the courts.

l'chaim - > «And also i think they can bring the matter in court, to get back whatever rightfully for them plus damages.

- > «And also i think they can bring the matter in court, to get back whatever rightfully for them plus damages.

Any action brought to enforce this agreement or matters related to the site shall be brought in either the State or Federal Courts of California.

A statement by MASSOB's leader, Uchenna Madu in Enugu said that proceeding with the matter said to have been brought before the Federal High Court by the Attorney

According to the Supreme court's recent decision regarding prop 8 it does not matter since is we do not have standing to bring a case against an administration for failure to enforce laws.

The Supreme Court has fixed Tuesday November 29th to hear arguments from counsels on the matter of tenure elongation of five governors brought before it by...

Ozekhome said the order was brought pursuant to order 26 rule 8 (1) of the Federal High Court Civil Procedure Rule 2009 and Section 44 (1) of the 1999 constitution which gives the court the discretionary powers to adjudicate on such maCourt Civil Procedure Rule 2009 and Section 44 (1) of the 1999 constitution which gives the court the discretionary powers to adjudicate on such macourt the discretionary powers to adjudicate on such matter.

The counsel informed the court that there was no indication that the former NSA would be brought to court for the trial even though the witnesses are in court and that also Mr. Rotimi Jacob (SAN) who was supposed to be the lead prosecution counsel was at the Court of Appeal for a different macourt that there was no indication that the former NSA would be brought to court for the trial even though the witnesses are in court and that also Mr. Rotimi Jacob (SAN) who was supposed to be the lead prosecution counsel was at the Court of Appeal for a different macourt for the trial even though the witnesses are in court and that also Mr. Rotimi Jacob (SAN) who was supposed to be the lead prosecution counsel was at the Court of Appeal for a different macourt and that also Mr. Rotimi Jacob (SAN) who was supposed to be the lead prosecution counsel was at the Court of Appeal for a different maCourt of Appeal for a different matter.

At the resumed hearing on the matter, yesterday, a witness brought by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, Mr. Yomi Badejo - Okusanya, told the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja that the PDP spokesman used N77.5 million to sponsor media campaigns for the re-election of ex-President Goodluck Jonathan.

The CDD in a statement reminded that the EC took the matter to the Supreme Court, ostensibly to bring finality to the many suits at the courts, challenging its decision to disqualify a number of presidential aspirants.

A state Supreme Court judge has tossed claims brought against Vineyard 48 by the New York State Liquor Authority, which was seeking to a reverse a decision that allows the Cutchogue winery to remain open as its legal matters are sorted out.

I said it before that the matter is in the Court and what happened in River state that brought Amaechi to power as Governor may happen in Ondo.

The Progressive People's Party (PPP), says it fears the Supreme Court's judgement on the Electoral Commission's suit challenging the disqualification of their flagbearer and eleven others from the December presidential elections, may not bring finality to the matter.

Mahama Ayariga hinted that, he might head to court to ensure that finality is brought to the matter, if the President does not reverse his decision.

On the contrary, it says that before being brought to court, the SEEC should investigate and adjudicate this matter — and the SEEC has already confirmed its belief that Dan Malloy and the state Democratic Party have violated state election law.

The guidelines say that when complaints of «educational neglect» are brought to the attention of social - service workers, the family - services agency must relay the matter to a juvenile court «so that a determination can be made as to whether such education is substantially equivalent to that provided locally.»

In cases where the matter went beyond an administrative hearing and was actually brought to court, one study cited in Mayes and Zirkel's review found that «schools prevailed in 54.3 % of special education court cases,» which the authors say is in line with the findings of other studies.

Backing the lawsuit is Students Matter, a nonprofit advocacy group that brought national attention to teacher tenure laws with an unsuccessful lawsuit in California state courts.

(d) In the case of an alleged act or practice prohibited by this title which occurs in a State, or political subdivision of a State, which has no State or local law prohibiting such act or practice, a civil action may be brought under subsection (a): Provided, That the court may refer the matter to the Community Relations Service established by title X of this Act for as long as the court believes there is a reasonable possibility of obtaining voluntary compliance, but for not more than sixty days: Provided further, That upon expiration of such sixty - day period, the court may extend such period for an additional period, not to exceed a cumulative total of one hundred and twenty days, if it believes there then exists a reasonable possibility of securing voluntary compliance.

All of this goes to show that no matter how heated legal disputes between companies get — and Microsoft and B&N spent a good part of last year arguing over Android - related patents — business reasons can bring them into partnership just as quickly as they can drag them into court rooms.

However, once you have completed your forms you still have to bring the legal petition physically to the bankruptcy court in your local area because you can't do this step online no matter how many websites advertise filing bankruptcy online.

Lapeer County Sheriff's Detective Jason Parks said the dogs were brought in by their owner, a 45 - year - old man, and authorities will seek to have the dogs destroyed if he relinquishes his rights to them or they will take the matter to court if he fights to keep them.

Ghost Recon: Wildlands» depiction of Bolivia has drawn a Bolivian government complaint with the country ready to bring the matter to the courts if needed.

On the other other hand, it could just be a massive head - fake, intended to lure Mann's quintet of high - priced lawyers down a costly and time - consuming dead end of matters I've no intention of bringing up in court.

The firm's lawyers are strongly committed to the processes of Collaborative Practice and resolving conflict without the courts, but are equally prepared to to bring matters to trial when necessary.

Allianz's position on appeal was that reg 44/2001 provides that, when the court of one European member state becomes seised of a matter, all other European courts must not allow the same matter to proceed until the court first seised has ruled, even if the proceedings first seised have purportedly been brought in breach of a jurisdiction agreement.

However, the court's view was that (no matter how sincerely the views were held) it could not be said that a reasonable person could sensibly have concluded that there was no alternative to the act of trespass either to bring the matters complained of to the attention of the relevant authorities or to avert a danger.

[I] n light of advances in technology allowing greater access to information that can inform a trial court about the past litigation history of venire members, it is appropriate to place a greater burden on the parties to bring such matters to the court's attention at an earlier stage.

-- that regulation does not preclude the application of a provision of national procedural law of a Member State which, with a view to avoiding situations of denial of justice, enables proceedings to be brought against, and in the absence of, a person whose domicile is unknown, if the court seised of the matter is satisfied, before giving a ruling in those proceedings, that all investigations required by the principles of diligence and good faith have been undertaken with a view to tracing the defendant.

The court specializes in patent matters, among other things, and the law had allowed patent suits to be brought virtually anywhere in the country.

While these documents dealt with matters that related generally to EU - Turkey relations, in the Court's view they did not in and of themselves possess the link relevant to bring them within the exception (paras 38 - 59).

Cooler heads prevailed and the matter was brought back to court on February the 17th, 2010, where fifth and sixth continuation dates were set for March 22nd, 2010 and May 4th, 2010.

The lawyer then brings a Charter complaint, that is the reason why this matter wound its way up to the Supreme Court (who ultimately rules against the lawyer).

Alternatively, if the matter proceeds in the Supreme Court, it is open to the defendant to ask that a successful plaintiff be denied costs on the basis that there was not sufficient reason to bring the action in the Supreme Court in the first instance.

The attorneys bring the matter to trial and represent the class in court to seek fair compensation for all members of the class.

When sentencing an Aboriginal offender, courts must consider: (1) The unique systemic or background factors which may have played a part in bringing the particular aboriginal offender before the courts.To do this courts are to take judicial notice of such matters as the history of colonialism, displacement, and residential schools and how that history continues to translate into lower educational attainment, lower incomes, higher unemployment, higher rates of substance abuse and suicide, and higher levels of incarceration for Aboriginal peoples.

1993)(«time - barred claims are not «eligible» for arbitration, and therefore the courts must decide as a threshold matter whether time remains for claimants to bring their actions»); Edward D. Jones & Co., Inc. v. Sorrells, 957 F. 2d 509, 512 (7th Cir.

I take leave to say that the New York statute, in the particulars here involved, can not be held to be in conflict with the Fourteenth Amendment without enlarging the scope of the Amendment far beyond its original purpose and without bringing under the supervision of this court matters which have been supposed to belong exclusively to the legislative departments of the several States when exerting their conceded power to guard the health and safety of their citizens by such regulations as they in their wisdom deem best.

This can happen for a number of reasons and, if the claimant is aware of this, has had the benefit of sound legal advice and has been able to give careful thought to whether or not to settle his claim at less than its true value, then that is a matter for the claimant's judgement and it can not be brought back to court simply because the claimant later reconsiders his position.

Our Court admonished, «The judge is required to weigh competing interests to ensure the truth of a matter is brought to light and justice to all parties before the court is served.&rCourt admonished, «The judge is required to weigh competing interests to ensure the truth of a matter is brought to light and justice to all parties before the court is served.&rcourt is served.»

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently had the opportunity to review a lawyer's role in the collaborative process when the husband in a family law matter (Mr. Elliott) brought a motion to have the lawyer acting for his ex removed as solicitor of record.

When this case comes to the High Court, the Court may want to consider issuing sanctions — not against defense attorney Brass, but against state's attorney Brunker for bringing this matter to begin with.

In a fifth case the Supreme Court issued its final judgment on a matter that had already been sent to Luxembourg for preliminary rulings on two occasions; it concerned the limitation period applying to claims brought against producers of goods (O'Byrne v Aventis Pasteur MSD Ltd [2010] UKHL 23).

Consider bringing any action in the Small Claims Court where matters are disposed of with less cost and delay: Damages of up to $ 25,000 may be awarded and vindication may still be achieved through the Judgment of the Court.

Parties must commit to the process; if either party opts out of the collaborative process before an agreement is reached, the parties must retain new lawyers before they can bring their matter to court.

«Journey to Justice» is organized in six sections that walk a SRL through the process of bringing their legal matter to court.

SRLs just think that lawyers are manipulating the system to delay their matter and confuse them, and complain that when they bring forward something that they believe to be important to the merits (rightly or wrongly, and usually because they have read about it in a case or on a law website) they are regularly told that they are wasting the court's time (ironically, often because they are speaking to the merits, when the motion requires them to only address the colour of opposing counsel's socks).

penalizes the defendant for engaging in public participation «plaintiff» means a person who initiates or maintains a proceeding against a defendant; «proceeding» means any action, suit, matter, cause, counterclaim, appeal, or originating application that is brought in the Supreme Court or the Provincial Court, but does not include a prosecution for an offence or a crime; «public interest» means the whole of the subject matter invites public attention, or a matter in which the public has some substantial concern because it affects the welfare of citizens, or one to which considerable public notoriety or controversy has attached; «public participation» means communication or conduct aimed at influencing public opinion, or promoting further lawful action by the public or any government body, in relation to an issue of public interest; «Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP)» means a claim that arises from a form of expression or public participation, by the person against whom the claim is asserted that was made in connection with an official proceeding or about a matter of public interest; Purposes of this Act: 2 The purposes of this Act are to a) Establish a statutory right to public participation for every individual; b) Encourage individuals to express themselves on matters of public interest; c) Promote broad participation in debates on matters of public interest; d) Discourage the use of litigation as a means of unduly limiting expression on matters of public interest; and, e) Preserve the right of access to the courts for all proceedings and claims that are not brought or maintained for an improper purpose.