A great deal of fun has been poked at the method of deciding historical
matters by majority vote of a select conclave, although that is how the church has usually decided matters of dogma.
Not exact matches
«The President of the Republic shall
by decree proclaim a referendum on crucial national
matters following a resolution
voted by an absolute
majority of the total number of Members of Parliament, taken upon proposal of the Cabinet.»
It is all about hiding, disguising the truth until it becomes of the past just as that as did that unlawful country was recognized
by the USA with out the UN
majority vote and UN members were to face the Reality that the USA is taking advantage of her
majority states and
voting power rather than the
majority of the UN member countries no
matter how small or poor they are although at that time the
majority of member countries were under occoupation or protection of USA and Allies and after the WW1 & 2!
Most importantly, church assemblies should reclaim their role as representative assemblies chosen to deliberate thoughtfully on significant
matters of Christian faith and life, rather than continuing to act as legislatures that reduce everything to stark alternatives and then make hurried decisions
by forced choice
majority voting.
While unanimity on central
matters of faith is rarely possible, they are not faithfully dealt with
by forced - choice
majority voting.
Originally, the Senate had a way for the
majority to
vote to end debate on a
matter,
by voting that it's time to
vote (yes, really) on the
matter at hand.
Meanwhile, as part of his proposals for a «new and fair» constitutional settlement, David Cameron has pledged that English
matters will only be
voted on
by English MPs, a proposal that could effectively undermine a future Labour
majority in the House of Commons.
By inference, the loud - mouth NPP politician was simply saying that the
majority of the nine - member panel sitting on the case are in support of the NPP's petition and thus no
matter the evidence before them, they will
vote in favour of the petitioners (the NPP), an action which will be tantamount to a miscarriage of justice and is also an affront to Ghana's security and stability.
The Labour Government returned to this issue in 2001 and whilst the then leader of the House, Robin Cook, confirmed that this was a House of Commons
matter, through the mechanism of a motion in Parliament, certain allowances were
voted through
by the Labour
majority.
By ruling of the presiding officer, or on motion of any Council member supported by at least one - third of the Council members present and voting, any matter on the agenda that has not yet come to vote, with the exceptions of a proposed amendment to the Constitution or a motion to recall an elective member of the Board, may be submitted to the entire Council membership for a mail ballot, or by electronic means, and shall require for its approval a favorable vote of a majority of the Council members, except that a resolution shall require for its adoption a favorable vote of two - thirds of those member
By ruling of the presiding officer, or on motion of any Council member supported
by at least one - third of the Council members present and voting, any matter on the agenda that has not yet come to vote, with the exceptions of a proposed amendment to the Constitution or a motion to recall an elective member of the Board, may be submitted to the entire Council membership for a mail ballot, or by electronic means, and shall require for its approval a favorable vote of a majority of the Council members, except that a resolution shall require for its adoption a favorable vote of two - thirds of those member
by at least one - third of the Council members present and
voting, any
matter on the agenda that has not yet come to
vote, with the exceptions of a proposed amendment to the Constitution or a motion to recall an elective member of the Board, may be submitted to the entire Council membership for a mail ballot, or
by electronic means, and shall require for its approval a favorable vote of a majority of the Council members, except that a resolution shall require for its adoption a favorable vote of two - thirds of those member
by electronic means, and shall require for its approval a favorable
vote of a
majority of the Council members, except that a resolution shall require for its adoption a favorable
vote of two - thirds of those members.
Any
matter taken up
by the Council shall be considered adopted if a
majority of the members present
vote in favor of it, with five exceptions: (i) A resolution shall require an affirmative
vote of two - thirds of the members present.
Except as otherwise specified in these Bylaws, all
matters before the membership at an Annual or Special Meeting or
by mail ballot, and all
matters before the Board of Directors shall be decided
by a
majority of the eligible
votes cast at the meeting or on the ballots.
By a
majority vote the board may call for an executive session and conduct sensitive business such as discipline and membership
matters without observers present.
If a quorum is present, the affirmative
vote of the
majority of the
voting members represented at the meeting entitled to
vote, and
voting on any
matter shall be the act of the members unless a greater number or
voting by classes is required
by applicable law.