Sentences with phrase «matters of right and wrong»

... «Superior Court» is to be construed historically, and that... it connotes a court having an inherent jurisdiction, in England, to administer justice according to the law, as and being a part of, or descended from, and as exercising part of the power of, the Aula Regia, established by William the First, which had universal jurisdiction in all matters of right and wrong throughout the kingdom, and over which, in its early days, the King presided in person.

Those beleaguered moderates are beleaguered because their argument on the matter is reduced to politics; and a purely political matter is, de facto, not a matter of right and wrong, but of differing opinion.

Now and then a flaming word torn from the heart of some German speaker revealed the intenseness of his loyalty to the lost cause, and one began to understand a little the temper which in extreme cases believes that the whole matter of the rights and wrongs of the war must yet be investigated but that only Germans possess the scientific qualities of mind necessary for an adequate investigation.

It is not a matter of right and wrong its football.

A part of me had this naive hope that someone would look at the anguish of a mother losing her children and take on my case as a matter of right and wrong, as a matter of helping a family facing a major breakdown as we are entering the final, latent stages of Parental Alienation.

Not exact matches

In an emailed statement, James Fitz - Morris, a spokesman for Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada, said Canada is committed to righting historical wrongs committed against Indigenous people and that the federal government is working to resolve the matter out of court, as it did with the Sixties Scoop survivors» class action.

Then it is a matter of waiting for the trade to expire and then seeing whether you were right or wrong.

I guess sometimes it's humbling to sit and think about how many people believe in every different religion no matter how different they are and then science and accepting the fact that a HUGE majority of people are going to be right or wrong when they die and some people spending their entire life trying to justify or prove something that may be wrong.

Saying god exists does not make that so... of course the opposite is true as well... all the pundits here (and Hawking) who like to call things by descriptive names like «fairy tales» do so because they are desperate to be right in this matter... because no one can be proven right or wrong in this I choose to respect the faith that some have in Science as well as thos who have faith in God's existence.

But if treaties do not matter, and if there is no such thing as Right and Wrong - in other words, if there is no Law of Nature - what is the difference between a fair treaty and an unfair one?

@BoldGeorge, «Morality and conscience is a matter of our hearts, the concepts of right, wrong, and fairness are «programmed» in each of us from God.»

But this sense of the matter has taken hold precisely because the media and the public have absorbed the understanding put forth by the courts of the rights and wrongs of these matters.

As Stephen Carter has written, it isn't simply a matter of understanding right from wrong and learning what the rules are; every employee also has to learn the «rules about following the rules.»

blah, blah, blah... waste your money on billboards, debate about what's real or myth, and who's right or wrong... i'm STILL a child of God... you can't shake my faith... all that matters to me is that I believe and trust in Him...

And when he obtained his rights, no matter how much wrong it had cost those around him, then once again he praised the perfection of the world.

The Roman Catholics wont allow me take Mass in their Church I do not care, I still go periodically and sill love it, why, because in spite of the idiosyncrasies we are all together, weather it be with a right or wrong heart, that does not matter, we are corporate, one body, warts and all and God Loves it.

Listening to «sound doctrine» is not a matter of who is right and who is wrong, but rather, who puts into practice what they have heard.

someone, you are absolutely correct, these doctors are front men getting paid; and it sounds good but not good enough James, and JWT, but no matter how you change it it is not right by YHWH, and romans is not the best of book, for that matter the NT is not a guide to follow, it comes, and goes, just like christian s using what is convenient to them only to excuse the wrong.

What is the matter with human affairs is that there is an accumulation of wrong decisions and actions that inevitably has produced a state in which right decisions and actions are more and more difficult.

If is a matter of what seems right or wrong and differing views on that then what determines morals, common consensus?

That is personal, not universal and as such is a matter of conscious, not a matter of biblical right or wrong.

There are other issues — Trevon Duval has been wildly inconsistent in multiple areas and Grayson Allen still seems like he has no idea what his role on this team is supposed to be — but none of them will matter if the Duke defense doesn't right its wrongs over the next month.

Maybe you are one of those fans who sticks by a Gunner no matter what as long as hes wearing the colours, as opposed to being instead one of those fans who jumps ship with the sway of a couple bad performances and like so to a couple of good ones whilst always right never wrong.

Shearer is right in that his constant pointing to excuses is wearing thin for many as it surely sets the wrong tone at the club as a whole, but all that matters between now and the end of the season is an upturn in form and a real push to win major honours.

So I just think it's a matter of right versus wrong, it's a matter of core values of humanity and fairness and freedom and the ability of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

He is of course right to suggest that their position puts then firmly on the wrong side of the argument and interestingly suggests that on this particular matter, and welfare reform in general the public are ahead of the politicians.

In a House of Commons debate on the riots Home Secretary Theresa May stated that the riots were symptomatic of a «wider malaise» including worklessness, illiteracy, and drug abuse but also stated that «Everybody, no matter what their background or circumstances, has the freedom to choose between right and wrong».

«Eliminating this regressive tax on women was a matter of fairness and I am proud to have signed this legislation to right that wrong,» Cuomo said in a statement.

«It's a matter of opinion on many of these issues, and there's no right or wrong.

It's a matter of fairness and we will continue to push for this wrong to be made right.»

Professor Smith said: «Work at the Siriuspasset site in north Greenland has cemented our thinking that it wasn't a matter of saying one hypothesis is right and one is wrong.

Mental health isn't a question of who's right or who's wrong, and it's not a matter of being normal or abnormal.

If a second marriage is an opportunity to right the wrongs of the first, it's in this spirit that men tend to become fairer in their handling of family and domestic matters.

For the hooligan Ben, there are no questions that can't be answered with brute force, but the others are more likely to ponder deeper matters, like right and wrong, life and death, and the commercial viability of religion.

An ensemble comedy about a group of wronged employees who attempt to rob the boss who took the money from their pension plans under the false pretense of investing, the movie does several things right — a talented cast, a deplorably matter - of - fact sociopath as a villain, and, above all, a dizzying setpiece of a robbery that features a 2,000 - pound car and three people dangling hundreds of feet in the air among them.

His intelligence and matters of right or wrong don't have much to do with it.

The school board was not in a position to know right or wrong about any matter of policy — we were then arguing about whether the board should have a curriculum committee — because the board didn't have the facts, which it didn't have because it was the superintendent's job to have them (and keep them).

When a CMO, or anyone else for that matter, gains the trust of a community to right the wrongs, to tip the scales of justice back in favor of children and then lets them down, it is unfathomable.

Jepsen lightly approached the question of where Judge Thomas Moukawsher's broad indictment of public K - 12 education was right or wrong as a matter of policy, but the appeal sharply attacks the judge's legal basis for ruling that shortcomings he identified violate students» rights under the state Constitution to a free and adequate education.

Indeed, there's no right or wrong answer here, and it's really a matter of preference.

So, it's not a matter of going to the wrong or right college anymore, there are simply not enough jobs and every six months a new crop of new grads graduates and starts looking for work.

Field two is incapable of giving one hypothetical «first cause» no matter how right or wrong, which is not relative and in turn demands another prior cause.

As has been shown repeatedly, first in the Hockey Stick, and subsequently in any published science on Global Warming, if it appears in the recent past warming was higher than today, or warming rates were higher than the CO2 age, it's merely a matter of finding the right science that proves it is wrong.

At a pre-conference dinner, I was shocked when James Hansen said something to the effect that it doesn't matter whether the science on CO2 and climate is right or wrong because we have to get rid of fossil fuels anyway.

When Charles tries to change Joshua's beliefs (for example if he wants to argue that he is right and that Joshua is wrong) then as a matter of pragmatics he should appeal to Joshua with arguments that are known to work with people like Joshua, but only if he is interested in changing Joshua's mind.These may or may not be logical arguments.

If the scientific establishment reacts to allegations of lack of transparency, behind - closed - door adjustments and premature release so as to influence politicians, by saying it does not matter because it gets the «right» result, they will find it harder to convince Mr Trump that he is wrong on things such as vaccines.»

This conclusion, however, is a matter of judgment, and can't be characterized as either «right» or «wrong».

I realised when all the luvvies of the planet rushed to the defense of the utterly fiendish Roman Polanski that tribal divisions have begun to matter more than right and wrong.

But you and I differ in that I am willing to «wait and see» to what degree the L&S analysis proves to be right or wrong whereas — if I understand you correctly — you think the matter requires rejection of the L&S conclusion concerning climate sensitivity.

This is not a matter of wrong and right, it is a matter of choice by members of society and those who represent them.