... there exists
a maximum natural warming rate at or below for which no one should have any objection.
Not exact matches
A
natural harbour, the
warm azure waters of the creek provide a perfect growing environment for the Pinctada
maxima oyster and produces world renowned South Sea Pearls.
Wringing Lilies from the Pine Nut's exhibition design will take
maximum advantage of the
natural cavernous look - and - feel of 56 Bogart's basement, using the lack of
natural ventilation,
warm spotlights, dusty floor and shadows to intimately connect the viewer with each work.
If we had a Tardis, we would be able to go back in time to the Paleoecene - Eocene Thermal
Maximum (PETM) about 55 - 56 million years ago, a time of substantial
natural global
warming, and observe the Greenhouse Effect growing stronger.
Bob, I think the notion of a modern grand
maximum which provides a hand - waving mechanism for
natural variability to explain all the global
warming that occurred late last century is hard for AGW skeptics to give up.
Nic Lewis's sensitivity only accounts for a
maximum of half the
warming since 1970 while also ignoring
natural variability, so where does he imply the other half comes from?
So, overall there is more
natural warming caused by increasing
maxima causing more evaporation and more condensation, at the same time.
4) the end results on the bottom of the first table (on
maximum temperatures), clearly showed a drop in the speed of
warming that started around 38 years ago, and continued to drop every other period I looked / /... 5) I did a linear fit, on those 4 results for the drop in the speed of global
maximum temps, versus time, ended up with y = 0.0018 x -0.0314, with r2 = 0.96 At that stage I was sure to know that I had hooked a fish: I was at least 95 % sure (max) temperatures were falling 6) On same
maxima data, a polynomial fit, of 2nd order, i.e. parabolic, gave me y = -0.000049 × 2 + 0.004267 x — 0.056745 r2 = 0.995 That is very high, showing a
natural relationship, like the trajectory of somebody throwing a ball... 7) projection on the above parabolic fit backward, (10 years?)
The world is still
warming at a long - term rate of about half a degree per century, but it will reach a
maximum within 50 years, then cool for nearly 500 years with superimposed 60 year
natural cycles.
The world is still
warming due to a
natural long term (934 year) cycle which will reach a
maximum in less than 50 years.
Backing that up, NASA says that 1) sea surface temperature fluctuations (El Niño - La Niña) can cause global temperature deviation of about 0.2 °C; 2) solar
maximums and minimums produce variations of only 0.1 °C,
warmer or cooler; 3) aerosols from
natural sources such as volcanic eruptions (Mount Pinatubo for example) have caused average cooling of 0.3 °C, but recent eruptions have had not had significant effect.
Since no one attributes
warming before 1900 to man - made CO2 (it did
warm, but this is attributed to
natural cyclical recovery from the little ice age) then the
maximum historic man - made
warming is 0.6 ºC.