I can speculate on why you think this, but
maybe at least a link to someone else who has written about TFA and special ed teachers?
Not exact matches
IGF1 levels does not necessarily means that you're gonna get cancer.IGF1 is a metabolic pathway for growth, yes growth in general from muscle tissue, bones, even organs BUT.There is a huge difference from ingecting into yourself, artificial IGF1 HGH etc and causing you body to secrete it naturall.When i say naturally i'm not talking about animal products (i am a vegan btw except some use of honey and bee pollen) animal product consumption is
linked to a numerous deseases due to saturated fats, trans fats, high concentrations of sulfuring aminos even heme iron http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23983135.Blaming soy protein (which btw has some great health benefits, general the soy bean) is
at least wrong.Ok consuming every day 1 kg of soy probably is not good, as NOTHING is
at very high quantities.Nothing wrong with natto, tempeh, tofu, soymilk, soybean, ans SPI.Asian people have been consuming soy for thousands of years without negative effects.Soy and especially SPI for people who are doing serious natural bodybuilding without use of AAS and artificial growth factors, and are also vegans believe me is a pain in the a $ $ and soy protein is
maybe the ONLY type of protein that has sufficient ratios of amino acids, from bcaas to even sulfur aminos (but in normal levels not the dangerous levels
linked to the homocysteine rise in the blood).
Please
link back to Dare to DIY by
linking to
at least one of our blogs (or copy this: I'm sharing this
at the Dare to DIY party hosted by Decor and the Dog,
Maybe Matilda, Newly Woodwards, and Two Twenty One!)
GGA posts generally have
at least a few sentences, musings on an issue,
maybe a vintage URL or two to accompany the hot
links.
i'll see if i can find a
link,
maybe not anything to do with my arguement, but interesting
at the very
least.
:) Seriously, when posting something like this please paste in the first paragraph or two and a
link (not a copyright problem, BTW), or
at least some kind of summary, and
maybe something about the authors if you think they're especially worth listening to; otherwise, I think it's pretty certain that nobody's going to follow up, however useful the article may be.
In this year of horrendous cyberheists — Equifax the most prominent — you've probably taken
at least a few precautions: changed passwords, stopped opening files and
links from unknown senders, upgraded your computer security measures,
maybe put a freeze on your credit reports.