Tables showing the per
meal federal reimbursement rates for the Afterschool Meal Program and Summer Food Service Program, as well as projected annual program income based on the number of children served.
Not exact matches
NSBA says the new nutritional standards will just widen the gap between what schools pay to provide free
meals and the
federal reimbursement rates.
But if Congress increases
reimbursement rates without reforming the use of
federal funds in school food budgets, the end result could be significant costs to taxpayers coupled with little improvement in the quality of
meals served.
If increases in
reimbursement rates prove desirable, the changes discussed here would help ensure that the added
federal funds are actually used to provide more nutritious school
meals.
For the first time in over three decades it would increase the
federal reimbursement rate, by approximately six cents a
meal.
Participating districts reported higher breakfast and lunch participation and were significantly more likely to report that the
federal reimbursement rate was sufficient to cover the cost of producing a reimbursable
meal.
Shows like Jamie Oliver's «Food Revolution,» and school districts like Chef Ann Cooper's former district in Berkeley, CA and current district in Boulder, CO, are often held up as examples of what's possible in school food reform, yet it's seldom ever mentioned that in each of these cases, far more money is being spent on those
meals than the current
federal reimbursement rate — and far more than that
rate plus six cents.
With low
federal reimbursement rates for school
meals (42 cents for paid
meals, $ 2.81 for reduced - price
meals and $ 3.21 for free
meals), the added cost of healthy food gets passed on to families that can least afford it.