Sentences with phrase «mean accepting everything»

Reading receptively and trustingly does not mean accepting everything in the text at face value, as Paul's own critical sifting of the Torah demonstrates.

The Christian life is not about tolerance... but truth... The Bible is quite specific about what sin is... we must love the sinner but not tolerate the sin... being a Christian requires us to know and speak the truth in love... tolerance means accepting everything without judgment... we can not do that in this society in the midst of moral decay.

Not exact matches

And the fact that Truman eschewed passing the buck didn't imply that he thought everything that happened in a very large federal government was literally his fault: he was saying that morally he accepted responsibility, which meant that accepting responsibility was his job.

«My job is to say that when you hear sell everything, that comment is, one, most likely wrong, and two, most likely meant for someone with no memory or who can accept a buy everything back pitch the very next day,» the «Mad Money» host said.

Donald Trump's warning that he might not accept the results of the presidential election exemplifies his approach to everything: Do whatever it takes to win, even if that means undermining the integrity of the entire system.

«hadn't seen any of that but I have seen a lot of liberals demanding «tolerance» which in liberal terms means; accept everything we demand regardless of your own beliefs and don't expect us to do the same» HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!

Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,

In John 18:5 - 6 Jesus sais «I AM he» and The power of his declaration of BEING GOD brought them to their knees... This clearly coincides with Exodus 3 when God appeared to Moses and Declared that his NAME was «I AM who I AM» Do you REALLY think that that is not by design??? Is this not also a very clear foreshadowing of the future (Romans 14:11, and Philliapians 2:10 - 11) Please oh please see how the Bible is so intricately intertwined and full of the The masters handiwork... Everything, all of life's questions are all within this book, not other sources, if one but will accept them, pray over them, and get the Lord's guidance... This is why I brought up 1 Cor 2:14, Which you took EXTREMELY out of context in the way I meant it to be discerned, which the verse itself explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not of this world.

So Jesus just loving everybody is true but loving someone does not mean approving or accepting everything they do.

And if you accept that son to be the meaning of everything, then you can avoid the worst possible things you can imagine happening after you die.»

Only thus will this destiny receive its true meaning and character even if, seen from outside, everything seems to be the same, whether we trustingly accept it or violently protest against the absurdity of life.

It is believed that if the collective energy were to turn around towards unification (meaning accepting and loving everything in the universe), the resulting energy will reveal the «GOD» which we are all trying to go back to - regardless of your vehicle.

But to accept it meant to risk everything as well.

«Unconditionally», as used above, simply means to accept everything the club does, unquestionably.

So, here's the thing: some people think the word «fan» or «supporter», in football, means one who supports a club and its players and whole - heartedly accepts everything done by the clubs administrative board, coach, players and asks no question whatsoever even when it is glaring that things are going wrong or not being done properly.

To be a champion should mean to be the best, so I like to think of it like that at times rather then accepting everything as dictated by the UFC.

look this is exactly what i mean xD i never even said that i accept everything wenger does, but because it wasnt a bashing comment of wenger here you are calling me emotional and blaming me ^ ^

If you don't have a particular goal in mind, and you accept that sometimes your baby will want to try things and sometimes will shun everything offered, and neither means your baby is a poor eater or you're a bad mommy, then you can just relax and enjoy.

It's like, «Oh, if I have to accept myself, that means I have to accept all of me and everything I've done and blah, blah, blah.»

By everything I mean, everything you have to buy or pay that accepts credit cards.

I don't mean the sort of respect that is old fashioned «teaching by authority», where you accept and memorize everything I say because I'm the teacher and I said so; I actually tell my students not to believe what I way just because I'm the teacher, to challenge it, to test it, and then when it makes sense or corresponds to their experiences in the labs (which at least spot check the concepts, although such checks can not be exhaustive) accept it and build a strong conceptual understanding.

I'm a Lukewarmer - Skeptic who accepts that H2O, CO2 and other so - called «greenhouse gases» in the Atmosphere do cause the mean temperature of the Earth Surface and Atmosphere to be higher than they would be if everything was the same (Solar radiation, Earth System Albedo,...) but the Atmosphere was pure nitrogen.

Whereas at the market's height a few years ago a developer might have rigidly insisted on retaining such a clause — safe in the knowledge that another buyer who would accept it was likely to be waiting in the wings — the subtle shift of power to buyers since then means that there is nothing to be lost from a challenge and, in an environment where developers are under increasing public pressure to grant fair leases and to do away with RPI, everything to be won.

We'll never accept a settlement from an insurance company that is too low, meaning you'll be able to finally receive everything you've been waiting for.