Sentences with phrase «mean accepting it as it was»

Not exact matches

Therefore, the key is not necessarily to immediately force people to act as if they're happy when they're devastated, but rather promote an overall culture and community that accepts failure as a means to self - improvement.

Self - acceptance also means accepting your income and success level as they are, she says.

Daylle Deanna Schwartz, recommends on the Huffington Post that you use Reality Training, which «means recognizing that if you want to be happy, you need to accept people as they are and find ways to deal with how they are, or don't.»

Of course, just because some people are over-concerned about their anxiety and would actually do better if they simply accepted their worrying doesn't mean that there's no such thing as excessive anxiety.

But the agreement didn't guarantee McDougal the articles she thought she had secured — it only gave American Media Inc. «the right to identify» her as the author of the articles, meaning they were not required to accept her columns.

So, while millennials are looking for meaning in their work life, the generation Z workforce may be more likely to place job security and remuneration as their primary considerations in seeking and accepting a job.

At the time Johnson also revealed that Fidelity had been accepting bitcoin payments in its cafeteria, but said the experiment had highlighted the technology's flaws as a means of payments.

««Virtual currencies» means a digital representation of value that is neither issued by a central bank or a public authority, not attached to a legally established currency, which does not possess the legal status of currency or money, but is accepted by natural or legal persons as a means of exchange or for other purposes, and can be transferred, stored or traded electronically.

By pressing «Submit», «Accept» or «I Agree», ISO or User, as the case may be, agrees: (i) that the Agreement and related documents shall be effective by electronic means, (ii) to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Agreement and related documents, and (iii) that it has had the ability to print or otherwise store the Agreement and related documents.

Bitcoin is accepted as a means of payment for goods and services.

Japan just allowed Bitcoin to be used as an accepted currency, and this event means that the computer could be on the verge of entering a new megatrend.

«The decision by the Liberals to meekly accept what Ottawa was offering means that British Columbia could be losing as much as $ 5 billion in transfers over the next 10 years,» said Darcy.

So, that is, accepting the digital currency today is completely legal; this means MonaCoin and other cryptos can be used as a medium of payment in businesses, stores, or restaurants.

Even where accepted, a currency whose value can swing 10 percent or more in a single day is useless as a means of payment.

Purchasing a home sans inspection generally means you are accepting the property as - is.

Venezuela's president just officially made it «legal tender,» meaning it can be used the same way as cash and is accepted as payment by the government.

A crypto currency is an alternative currency that is designed to serve as a means of exchange between people and businesses that are willing to accept them.

Here again, money's role as a generally accepted means of payment can be confusing, because it means that a loan is likely to consist of a loan of money.

Following through on a sale without an inspection generally means a buyer is accepting the property as - is.

Purchasing a home sans inspection usually means the buyer is accepting the property as - is.

The Trustee may accept delivery of Bitcoins by such other means as the Sponsor, from time to time, may determine to be acceptable for the Trust, provided that the same is disclosed in a prospectus relating to the Trust filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 424 under the Securities Act.

Even if you accept that the universe is as a whole headed toward disorder (outdated terminology, btw) that by no means implies that all parts are becoming more disordered.

He meant this as a compliment, I was sure, even with the backhanded swipe at my faith, and I was glad to accept it as such.

What it really means is that for each of the countless false hypotheses that are contemplated by researchers, we accept a 5 percent chance that it will be falsely counted as true — a decision with a considerably more deleterious effect on the proportion of correct studies.

faith goes against science itself; faith means no proof, in science without proof nothing is accepted to be fact (aka theory) as far as a god, which one?

I accept that in your mind you friend is as real as anything you experience, but that doesn't mean it's real outside your mind.

Being a «Christian» means you have accepted Jesus Christ as your Savior.

This means you have a concept «God» and that you accept it as being «true».

As long as evangelism is the focus, God will continue to bless it... Shoe box gifts are distributed along with The Greatest Gift of All, an illustrated booklet that gives a clear presentation of the true meaning of Christmas... After the shoe boxes are distributed, we also provide follow - up materials to give children further opportunities to accept Christ and grow in their faitAs long as evangelism is the focus, God will continue to bless it... Shoe box gifts are distributed along with The Greatest Gift of All, an illustrated booklet that gives a clear presentation of the true meaning of Christmas... After the shoe boxes are distributed, we also provide follow - up materials to give children further opportunities to accept Christ and grow in their faitas evangelism is the focus, God will continue to bless it... Shoe box gifts are distributed along with The Greatest Gift of All, an illustrated booklet that gives a clear presentation of the true meaning of Christmas... After the shoe boxes are distributed, we also provide follow - up materials to give children further opportunities to accept Christ and grow in their faith.

The kindergarten logic of the believer that those who accept big bang as the furthest back we can go in this iteration of the Universe means they think «something can't come from nothing» is as much a misrepresentation of Hawkins» view of the cosmos as your articulation of his view of pansp.ermia was.

Do you accept others as GOD meant them to be??

Unfortunately, as lawyers increasingly accept that law is, among other things, a profit - making business, many seem to believe that means all ethical bets are off.

However, for those who insist on trying to find some meaning from it, they are forced to decide which side of the contradictions to take and since much of it is untrue, they also must guess as to what part of the bible they should accept and what they should ignore as just a fable.

As a reader trying to be charitable, I face an unattractive choice: accept that His Eminence does hold the mistaken view that mercy is essential to God; or assume that when he emphatically made the multiple important statements at key points in his book that mercy is essential to God, he didn't mean them.

(Colossians 2, 9)», that means, where Jesus was present also the Triune God was present, He still recognized or accepted the Temple as God's tenement (John 2, 16:... my Father's house...).

If you were a real Christian you would know Christs words speak for themselves and the fact that he didn't take the sword away and turn it into a pruning shear right then and there does not mean he was saying «I mean all this stuff is for later after I come back and kill all the evil people and those who haven't accepted me as their savior so you won't have to fear anyone so you can finally give up your guns and weapons of war...» You disgust me chad.

If one accepts the word God with its usual conventional connotations and traditional meanings, then the answer is No, as Schweitzer himself made clear.

Christ going to the cross meant salvation for all who choose to accept Him — including Zimmerman — just as it was for another famous murderer — the apostle Paul.

In the complementarian manifesto, the Danvers Statement, egalitarians are accused of «accepting hermeneutical oddities devised to reinterpret apparently plain meanings of biblical texts,» resulting in a «threat to Biblical authority as the clarity of Scripture is jeopardized and the accessibility of its meaning to ordinary people is withdrawn into the restricted realm of technical ingenuity.»

For the faithful in Christ can not accept this view, which holds either that after Adam there existed men on this earth who did not receive their origin by natural generation from him, the first parent of all, or that Adam signifies some kind of multiple first parents; for it is by no means apparent how such an opinion can be reconciled with what the sources of revealed truth and the acts of the magisterium of the Church teach about original sin, which proceeds from a sin truly committed by one Adam, and which is transmitted to all by generation, and exists in each one as his own» -LCB- Humani Generis 37).

«If you accept evolution, even a well - meaning, theistic evolution, this will eventually become pantheistic evolution, which in turn will become atheistic evolution» — as if this were a series of logical steps to inevitable conclusions.

I agree it is not our job but the quote in the bible is meant as a warning that Jesus WILL separate the wheat from the chaff and that it is important to accept his gift of salvation.

I find the raising of Lazarus from the dead (John 12) more difficult to accept as historical, although its symbolic meaning as brought out by John is powerful.

@Dunk, Morality doesn't have meaning beyond how if effects people, the rules we agree on and accept as a society will mean nothing when catastrophic even or the sun expanding wipes us off the star map; but why isn't it's effect on mankind enough?

Drawing upon The Courage To Be, Scott is aware of three characteristics of «absolute faith»: (1) To live in the power of being that enables a person to withstand the onslaughts of guilt, death, and meaninglessness; (2) To experience the dependence of all manifestations of nonbeing upon being, such as the dependence of meaninglessness upon meaning, thereby testifying to the ultimacy of being - itself; and (3) To accept being accepted in spite of one's separation from the power of being (AC 95f).

If religious belief is attained when reason makes a «total response of the total being to what is apprehended as the ultimate reality,» such that in this act reason is reborn, then it follows that those who totally accept a given world - view as ultimate, whether it be theistic or non-theistic, naturalistic or supernaturalistic, immanentist or transcendentalist, as normative for their entire lives and as the supreme value in their hierarchy of values, and hence not taken as a means but as an end, belong to the religious dimension.

«There's this kind of complex dance that we do as people of faith in this world and sometimes it means accepting something that's not perfect,» Metaxas said, «I think the reason this rankles, not just for me but for so many people, it reminds them of Pharisaical thinking, it's legalistic.

This self love is sin.God never forced chaos on us.we gave in to satan's lies about evil being an inherent necessity.Jesus said he was the way, the truth and life.He was the life (love) that everyone craves for, he is the truth which meant that his love was our only need and he exposed the lies of satan that we could attain bliss on subordinating people to our cravings.Sinning people don't accept a God who requires us to renounce ourselves because they are not convinced of God's love being enough for them and they are afraid to destroy their identity and live for the Glory of God.So, upon death, these souls realize that the physical world was just a shadow of God's love (the nature, food etc) and their own lies (violence, self love etc) and realize that love is their only need.They pursue it from other soul beings but are hurt that there's only hate and self love.They are afraid to approach the light because they don't want to renounce their identity as they have not recognized God's love before.

If the pastor has a keen awareness of what we have come to regard as the interpersonal hurt of his patient; knows the desperate and yet fatal need of the patient to evade further pain, no matter by what means, and often by striking out and hurting loved ones; feels something of the almost overwhelming and intolerable anxiety the patient experiences; is not too shaken by the terror evoked through what Kierkegaard expressed as «shut - up - ness unfreely revealed»; and can accept the consequent intense feelings of guilt and shame which isolate the patient from himself, from others and from God, then his ministry has within it the necessary element for a supportive and creative experience for the patient.

The whole point of Christianity is not to accept and affirm autonomous or self - created identities as ultimately determining of who someone is, but to define what it means to be a person in terms of Christian teaching.