Sentences with phrase «mean anything by»

While it doesn't really mean anything by itself, think about this: more accidents means that these individuals will be seeking claims more often than members of lower - risk other groups.

I prefer to think that Steve did not mean anything by it.

Yet a cartoon hand holding a cross not only doesn't mean anything but doesn't even mean anything by not meaning anything.

I was like..., I mean he obviously didn't know..., you know, I mean he didn't mean anything by it, you know, not in that manner, but I just felt like that seemed sexual because you are not breastfeeding anymore.

While you may not mean anything by it, it can diminish how your kids see themselves.

Not exact matches

Flow is a term coined by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi in his book Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience to mean complete absorption in a given task where concentration is «so intense that there is no attention left over to think about anything irrelevant.»

For his IT crew, this means showing up on time, addressing customers by name, answering questions and checking whether customers need anything else before wrapping up jobs.

By help I mean I would sit next to him and hand him whatever tool he asked for, all the while admiring his ability to fix (at least temporarily) anything.

That means that passengers could easily spend longer waiting in line at immigration than in flight, if the usual experience of international travel is anything to go by.

A couple of years back, there was a phenomenal (and by phenomenal, I mean completely offensive, juvenile and NSFW) video about an animal called the honey badger, who just doesn't care about anything (or in the words of the video, doesn't give a s #!

And by the way, you don't change anything by being mean.

(Holmes was quick to explain that she didn't mean to take anything from their accomplishments by noting that they had co-founders — it's just that in one particular way, their achievements are different from hers).

If you want to study the arts because you love it and can't imagine doing anything else, by all means go ahead.

Right now, for the first time in human history, world currencies are free - floating, meaning they're not backed by anything tangible.

It remains to be seen what, if anything, our dysfunctional Congress can muster to break the now entrenched pattern of consumer privacy abuse highlighted by the Cambridge Analytica news, but that is by no means limited to Facebook.

That's created a large cadre of people (and by «people,» I mean white men from elite colleges) who can get away with just about anything.

By this I mean behaving as if you are already in competition with an existing company before launching anything.

Basically, these are numbers that sound impressive but don't necessarily mean anything of significance because they're not actionable by themselves.

So, banks, shadow banks, and anyone else of systemic importance, I implore you: for the good of everyone, by which I mean for the good of the human species, keep this garbage, and anything connected to it, the hell off of your balance sheets.

None of these are by any means the final word on anything, but they do address some of the biggest mistakes I see investors make.

By niche, we mean almost anything.

Just because God spoke to you in a dream does nt mean anything unless it is confirm by an exact account from another person (s).

It is an opposition by means of which anything can be grasped.»

I am a Catholic (by Catholic I mean, regularly attend church, send my children to Catholic school, and work in many ministries) I also use contraception, but I don't think that organizations the church runs should have to pay for anything they oppose — even it I don't oppose it.

Furthermore, any child entering your home, either by adoptive or biological means, is never anything less than a miracle in the first place — 25 or 35, it's all God.

for the one whose father was killed by osama, sorry is not gonna mean anything to you but did you know this?

Rejecting the obvious insane assertion by religiots that there must have been some creature that farted it all into existence, doesn't automatically mean a firm belief in anything else.

Jesus» original disciples likely never thought of him as anything more than a great rabbi, and some might have thought him a good rallying point for a revolt, they could have even whispered that he was anointed by God, but the idea of his being divine only seems to enter into the gospels around the time many Greek educated folks had converted, bringing their own views of what a «son of God» means into the faith.

Well, seriously, I think God can cure anything... but it doesn't mean that God never give the KNOWLEDGE to the human being to treat sickness by himself.

Does your prayer accomplish anything demonstrable by ordinary means?

By Protestant I mean an impatience with anything that is secondary to this, anything that gets in the way of our overwhelming hunger for grace and his overriding desire to feed us.

If you only want to hear your preferred narrative then by all means don't read anything that isn't blessed by your pastor who drives that $ 70k caddy parked in his reserved spot in front of the church.

If by issue you mean there being anything unhealthy going on in me or inappropriate in my management of the situation then I would see things differently.

Suffice it to say that a clear understanding of what the physicists mean by the finitude of the world precludes any deduction from it of anything «beyond» the world.

«matt — just because we can use science and reason to explain natural events doesn't mean there isn't a god, case in point, rainbows, a sign given by god to Noah can be explained by science but is still a promise made by god» But thats not proof of anything.

In using the philosophical term «deconstruction,» however, I didn't mean to suggest that the process is controlled by anything like conscious logic or deliberate choice.

I can't quite figure out what has people upset about this??? If you don't believe that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints is true, then I am guessing you probably don't believe that the ordinance of proxy baptism that has been done by member of that church actually means anything.

With carefully chosen words and images charged with first - century political meaning, he constantly reminded his followers that they were to be a set - apart people, a people who lived counter-culturally by loving their enemies, praying for those who persecuted them, lending without expecting anything in return, and surrendering allegiance to a crucified and risen Lord.

Even supposing that two such pure opposites could constitute one individual or entity, this entity seems to have little to do with anything that has been meant by God.

By «missions» I mean anything that is helping you accomplish the mission of the church, which is to make disciples of all nations.

The temptation to adopt Satanic means to gain God's ends, to seek peace by making war, to use force to accomplish what can never be accomplished by anything but persuasion and love, is always with us.

The world may or may not be as tidy as it is often possible to conceive it to be; but it is part, and surely a legitimate part, of our inheritance from the successes of science, quite apart from anything else, that given two otherwise satisfactory interpretations of which one is simpler then that simpler one is preferable even if there is no means of judging — by appeal to evidence, say — that it is not, in respect of its greater simplicity, mere plausible fantasy.

I mean this is you guy's logic, I'm not going to read the bible because it's not true and I don't believe anything in it and I'll show you that nothing is true in it by disproving what I think a book says even though I have never read it nor understand it.

«And these signs will follow those who believe: in My name they will cast out demons; they will speak with new tongues; they will take up serpents; and if they drink anything deadly, it will by no means hurt them; they will lay their hands on the sick, and they will recover.»

Not sure i am convinced because how do you explain the verse an eye for an eye in the old testament there have always been consequences for wrong doing and stiill are for sin.If we believe the word then that word is from God not satan.As far as satan is concerned he uses violence as his tools of trade he works on our fears and is limited to robbing stealing and destroying he does nt have anything else.Violence confirms to us that there is a spiritual battle going on both on the earthly plane and in the heavenlys and the battle is over souls.The verse the kingdon of heaven is expanding and violent people take it by force is referring to that spiritual battle and as satan uses violence to expand his dominion so does God use violence to counter him.So what does he mean by that term for me i think it is saying that the the force of evil that satan uses or violence is overcome by a greater violence or force a more powerful one that being the Love of Christ.Through the cross we see that clearly portrayed and in our lives that very same battle is still happening right now for dominion be clear if we walk in the flkesh satan will have dominion over us but if we walk according to the spirit and abide in Christ we have freedom from our old nature.and satan.He can oppose us but he wont be able to influence us if we are in Christ.

«If the sensus fidelium means anything, it ought to be taken seriously by the bishops in this area in which they apparently have no direct experience,» we are told.

And these signs will follow those who believe: In My name they will cast out demons; they will speak with new tongues; «they will take up serpents; and if they drink anything deadly, it will by no means hurt them; they will lay hands on the sick, and they will recover.»

The ANT - OAR proposal represent a scientifically and morally sound means of obtaining human pluripotent stem cells that does not compromise either the science or the deeply held moral convictions of those who oppose the destructive use of human embryos for research» which is a creative approach that can be embraced by both the anything - goes camp and the nothing - goes.

Taking a stand against something means you believe in something therefore you can't be an atheist because atheists by definition do not believe in anything.

As we read this history, the furor over stem cells was fueled by numerous factors: the near - universal human desire for magic; patients» desperation in the face of illness and their hope for cures; the belief that biology can now do anything; the reluctance of scientists to accept any limits (particularly moral limits) on their research; the impact of big money from biotech stocks, patents, and federal funding; the willingness of America's elite class to use every means possible to discredit religion in general; and the need to protect the unlimited abortion license by accepting no protections of unborn human life.