Your comment actually said nothing at all
that means anything so how can we rate it!
Not exact matches
Flow is a term coined by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi in his book Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience to
mean complete absorption in a given task where concentration is «
so intense that there is no attention left over to think about
anything irrelevant.»
We discuss how having a big vision is
so important, but that it doesn't
mean anything if nothing comes of it.
Mute
means silent,
so would you really want to make a point that doesn't say
anything?
On Wednesday at 4:55 p.m., a supervisor sends a group email to the entire team stating,» I don't want to seem inauthentic,
so I decided not to do
anything for you for Thanksgiving or send a message I didn't
mean.»
So, banks, shadow banks, and anyone else of systemic importance, I implore you: for the good of everyone, by which I
mean for the good of the human species, keep this garbage, and
anything connected to it, the hell off of your balance sheets.
This is
meant to be more of a barometer than
anything else and this data should not be used to make a business case, but more
so just to give you a sense of opportunity.
So, as a small business owner, the substantive relationship you have with your local banker, or the social capital you've built within your community over years, if not decades — which propels enormous goodwill, customer loyalty, and economic value —
means little, if
anything, to regulators.
And honestly saying you believe in God and self - identify as Christian doesn't
mean you actually Lean on God for
anything so they say they're Christian but living as an Atheist.
I
mean, not because the music is
so weird or
anything, but generally it seems it's pretty upbeat and fun.
So when u say the bible clearly states, that
means you don't read the bible because the BIBLE DOES NOT CLEARLY STATE
ANYTHING!
It was
meant for ground cover, and much work had been done to keep it
so that the ground cover's roots would never go deep enough nor allow
anything but that hardy creeper to survive.
And these people have been taught for
so long to take their religious leaders at their word and that their religion
means more than
anything that they don't care whether the person is lying or not.
You don't know
anything about evolution or what survival of the fittest actually
means,
so you might want to stop now before you make yourself look any more idiotic.
I know that many people associate «Messiah» with the Christian Bible, but this is a word
meaning: «an anointed one», or «to anoint»,
so, technically, what does that have to do with
anything?
So, you
mean, don't tell them
anything about religion at all?
sry, i
meant the word «perspectives» and the word i spelt doesn't look
anything like this
so i corrected myself.
The moment
meant so little to us that no one thought
anything of it.
Thus pantheism
means literally almost
anything you please, and
so nearly nothing.
And if it doesn't actually
mean anything to you then why be
so upset about it?
Also I said I am not a religious person and that
means I do not believe in any of this stuff but I am not going to say it is impossible because I think almost
anything is possible
so calling me a religious
anything is about as empty an insult as anyone can toss my way, read before you insult, oh yes and make sure you retain what you read, that might help you a little.
Why don't the people who have been blessed to believe in our creator Christians muslims and jews see the similarities between us Have you been
so institutionalised as to only see what differences there are Will it
mean anything on the last day
I
mean, I understand that religion spreads because adults take advantage of the fact that children are born programmed to believe
anything coming out of an adult's mouth, both educational and BS, but all of this represents such a huge, incredible waste of time and effort and money that could be put to
so many good uses...
Always try to use the language
so as to make quite clear what you
mean and make sure your sentence couldn't
mean anything else.
Not sure i am convinced because how do you explain the verse an eye for an eye in the old testament there have always been consequences for wrong doing and stiill are for sin.If we believe the word then that word is from God not satan.As far as satan is concerned he uses violence as his tools of trade he works on our fears and is limited to robbing stealing and destroying he does nt have
anything else.Violence confirms to us that there is a spiritual battle going on both on the earthly plane and in the heavenlys and the battle is over souls.The verse the kingdon of heaven is expanding and violent people take it by force is referring to that spiritual battle and as satan uses violence to expand his dominion
so does God use violence to counter him.
So what does he
mean by that term for me i think it is saying that the the force of evil that satan uses or violence is overcome by a greater violence or force a more powerful one that being the Love of Christ.Through the cross we see that clearly portrayed and in our lives that very same battle is still happening right now for dominion be clear if we walk in the flkesh satan will have dominion over us but if we walk according to the spirit and abide in Christ we have freedom from our old nature.and satan.He can oppose us but he wont be able to influence us if we are in Christ.
But that has the consequence of
meaning that oppressive, dictatorial governments are never doing
anything wrong
so long as they stay in power.
Gays, atheists, socialists think
anything that is different than their own views are
mean,
so even if you tell the truth and it doesn't favor them then its
mean.
So logical positivism would say that they don't
mean anything.
I do not
mean, of course, to say
anything so foolish as that language was not used for everyday things in the real world.
What I do believe is that we need to really know Jesus to know God — Although text
meaning can change Jesus who is the word of God — His personality doesn't change......
so when you read behind the text and see the personality of Jesus — you get to know Him for who He is and then I can test
anything the bible or text say against His character for truth!
Im one of these spiritual people, and when I say that, I do nt
mean I believe in God, only that I do nt know
anything so I claim to never know I do.
If religion is to
mean anything definite for us, it seems to me that we ought to take it as
meaning this added dimension of emotion, this enthusiastic temper of espousal, in regions where morality strictly
so called can at best but bow its head and acquiesce.
To develop a thought's
meaning we need therefore only determine what conduct it is fitted to produce; that conduct is for us its sole significance; and the tangible fact at the root of all our thought - distinctions is that there is no one of them
so fine as to consist in
anything but a possible difference of practice.
Oh...
so you just post stuff without the intent on actually
meaning anything.
So, technically, claiming not to be a Muslim is a completely useless statement — by definition it doesn't
mean anything.
LOL nice way to stir the masses... by the way... The scripture of «Thou shalt have no other gods before me» (
meaning Jehovah himself) all will see regardless if they want to read and research any of this...
so lets get the crybabies going how they aren't going to study
anything, and how that all who do are wrong... Sam
@Moby» «We don't know»
means just that, admitting ignorance is not a «rejection» of
anything» @Chad «
so, if you do nt reject a designer as one of the live options explaining the origin and fine tuning of the universe, why do nt you investigate it?
When you try to use Evolution to explain
anything, it just sounds
so absurd, yet they (by they, i
mean evolutionists) try to push it on us like it's a verified fact?
I have had
so many bad thoughts about the holy spirit and when i say bad i
mean they are horrible hateful things but i have never said
anything i have only thought them... I try to say sorry when i pray but i feel like it isnt forgiven..
But if this feeling was to
mean anything, it had to be defined or fenced in by criteria;
so in On Religion Schleiermacher defined the feeling as an intuition of the whole and in The Christian Faith Schleiermacher defined the feeling as absolute dependence.
The Prophet warns, «Say not, «I have found the truth,» but rather, «I have found a truth,»» One of infinitely many truths, it seems, «For the soul walks upon all paths,» Which
means that
anything the Prophet says Falls like a perfectly formed olive leaf Upon at least one of those paths,
So that His profundity is everlasting and without diminishment, As long as he pronounces oratorically After the manner of Sir Laurence Olivier Reading the King James Bible.
So there, none of that might
mean anything to you.
I
mean we still have it partially but not like in heaven because look we have to know what it is like to be sick or hungry or whatever
so that when we have total grace from God in heaven we never ever turn from Him or do
anything that will take us away from him because doing it if we don't learn it now and we do it in heaven we wold be banished forever like the fallen angels.
I'm assuming that by «a higher authority» you
meant the made up kind
so loosely defined that it can be interpreted as supporting
anything it's «followers» choose.
But does this authorization of the Church by Christ really
mean anything if the teaching of the Church has authority only in
so far as it is corroborated by Scripture, and if the Church does not have the final say about whether a certain teaching is corroborated by Scripture or not?
I am going to weigh in, being a catholic and the whole shabang... First of all this is not infringing on anyone's right to practice their religion... Requiring insurance companies to provide contraception for women does not
mean the woman has to use it or purchase it... Catholic hospitals take federal funds for their patients, therefore they are not exempt from employment laws... If the Catholic Diocese doesn't want to provide the insurance claiming religious beliefs, then they can no longer accept federal funded patients... They also know that they will be subjected to discrimination lawsuits based hiring and religious discrimination — non-catholics work there, and therefore are being denied healthcare due to catholic beliefs... Majority if not all Catholic women do, have, or had used contraception in their lifetime... God does not nor does the bible say
anything about contraception, since it had not been invented yet —
so this is a man - made law, made by a bunch of men, who have never had a menstrual cycle — and the pain that comes with it....
It was the laughter of admiration, the way you involuntarily exhale and toss your head back when Robert DeNiro or Meryl Streep says a line in a movie
so well and
so cool and
so true that you can't do
anything but laugh, even when the line is not
meant to be funny or when someone's wrapped in a rug and getting crammed into the trunk of a car.
And even then, his writings are
so va.gue that they could
mean anything you want them to.
I'm a libertarian, which
means I tend to vote Republican almost entirely on the basis that I really just don't trust the government to do almost
anything right and always tax the hell out of us
so they and their friends can get rich, which is what the Dems love to do, but the Republican party is making it harder and harder for me to continue voting for them with asinine statements like this.
Maybe we do not need to child - proof
anything anymore, but we need to take steps in practicing child - likeness, and that
means we step away from the adulting we
so often convince ourselves we need to do every day of the week.