All that doesn't
mean atmospheric measurements from satellites and balloons are worthless, unreliable, or uninformative.
Not exact matches
From in situ
measurements made over a 20 - month period by the Tunable Laser Spectrometer (TLS) of the Sample Analysis at Mars (SAM) instrument suite on Curiosity at Gale Crater, we report detection of background levels of
atmospheric methane of
mean value 0.69 ± 0.25 ppbv at the 95 % confidence interval (CI).
Large scale dust storms change the
atmospheric opacity and convection; as always when comparing
mean temperatures, the altitude at which the
measurement is made matters, but to the extent it is sensible to speak of a
mean temperature for Mars, the evidence is for significant cooling from the 1970's, when Viking made
measurements, compared to current temperatures.
Alaska Arctic Tundra CH4 Flux Study — Impacts of AGW / CC Published 8 - Jan 2018 Estimating regional - scale methane flux and budgets using CARVE aircraft
measurements over Alaska Conclusions Analysis of CH4 column enhancements supplemented by simulated
atmospheric transport allowed us to estimate the monthly -
mean CH4 fluxes from our study domain (50 — 75 N, 130 — 170 W).
Validation of the CO2 inversion product (v16r1):
mean bias of the
atmospheric component of this product with respect to independent aircraft
measurements in the free troposphere.
Measurements of
atmospheric isotopes such as C12 / C13 can not prove anything either because CO2 ′ s residence time based on the IPCC's figures in 2007 - AR4 is 3.8 years
meaning the C12 / C13 ratio can not change substantially because human CO2 is rapidly absorbed by natural sinks.
For instance the Vostok ice - core data over 415,000 years has an average
measurement - spacing of 756 years,
meaning that the likelihood of measuring an increase in
atmospheric CO2 as the one measured at Mauna Loa over the last 50 years, if one existed in the Vostok ice - core samples, amounts to 6.6 % (i.e. 50/756).
My standard example of this is the
atmospheric physicists who blithely assume that the
mean global temperature curve is actually a
measurement.
The observed annual
mean latitudinal gradient of
atmospheric CO2 concentration during the last 20 years is relatively large (about 3 to 4 ppm) compared with current
measurement accuracy.
With the ever increasing divergence of surface temperatures (NASA GISS) from satellite ones (UAH / RSS), and the subsequent divergence of overheated climate models (IPCC CMIP5) to observed reality, it is worth some background on the
atmospheric temperature
measurement systems used to measure the temperature of the lower troposphere — the exact place where global warming theory is
meant to occur and be measured:
In the article «Global
atmospheric particle formation from CERN CLOUD
measurements,» sciencemag.org, 49 authors concluded «
Atmospheric aerosol nucleation has been studied for over 20 years, but the difficulty of performing laboratory nucleation - rate
measurements close to
atmospheric conditions
means that global model simulations have not been directly based on experimental data.....
The
atmospheric level reported is a
mean concentration from three weeks of
measurements during both summer 2005 and spring 2006 (21).
Matrosov S. Y. and D. D. Turner (March 2018): Retrieving
mean temperature of
atmospheric liquid water layers using microwave radiometer
measurements.
This process, commonly known as the greenhouse effect, has been discovered many years ago and was later confirmed by
means of laboratory experiments and
atmospheric measurements.