Sentences with phrase «mean both score more»

I think 442 with Laca playing a bit deeper is another option as two strikers mean both score more given the service behind them.

Not exact matches

Huffman wrote that 70 percent of the suspicious accounts (662) had zero karma, meaning no meaningful engagement (upvotes or downvotes) from other users, while about one percent of the accounts (13) had a karma score of more than 10,000, indicating that they reached and interacted with many Reddit users by posting and commenting on the site.

U.S. teens scored a mean 492 on the OECD test, eight points below the overall global mean of 500 — and more than 100 points below first - ranked Shanghai - China's 603.

That means, the more achieved the identity, the more the participants knew who they were, the lower their scores on the measures of procrastination,» Pychyl explains.

The expense of air travel ranked as a more significant concern, getting a mean score of 4.9 on a seven - point scale.

The inconvenience caused by security procedures came in a close second, earning a mean score of 4.7, with one executive saying he would «make more efforts to avoid the U.S.» Many also cited teleconferencing as a viable alternative to flying, giving it a mean score of 4.6.

More from Balancing Priorities: What a rate hike means for your credit card What to do with your bond portfolio as Fed rates rise Credit scores are set to rise

Equifax creates several different business credit scores that are designed to predict how likely a business is to experience a severe delinquency, which means falling 91 days or more past due on an account, having an account charged off or filing for bankruptcy.

A score of 100 denotes payments on average 30 days sooner than the due date, 80 means paying on the due date, and scores below 20 shows average payments 120 or more days after the due date.

A credit score usually means you can keep more of your money because you will receive lower interest rates on your home or car loan.

Borrowers with fair to average credit — which means they have credit scores between 630 and 680 — will face more difficulty in getting personal loans than borrowers with good credit.

The bank looks for borrowers with strong credit history, which means a few or more years of credit history and a credit score of at least 680.

You probably still have questions about what getting a new card might mean for your credit score, so let's get into some more detail about credit scores in general.

Although a bad credit score doesn't always mean you can't get approved for credit, it's more likely that the credit you're approved for will cost more.

A loan grade of A1, for example, has the lowest risks and the best interest rates, whereas a G5 loan means you have a lower credit score and bring more risk to the table.

b. Pastors whose personal scores are close to the mean orientation of the congregation seem frequently to enjoy a more satisfying relationship with their congregations than do pastors whose own scores differ significantly from those of their flocks.

This means that Scripture will function much more like a musical score than a blueprint for our lives.

Just because an atheist and agnostic scored higher doesn't mean that the atheist or agnositc made a more informed and therefore more correct decision.

More interesting perhaps is what the result in the Manchester derby could mean, with Man United scoring the only goal of the game against a below par Man City.

I mean, you could ask for more scoring than Read provides from a 4th liner, but the Flyers don't have anybody better.

what a laff, his career wud have continued in the league 2 by now... m not even interested in arsenal matches, I mean what do I wan na watch that I haven't seen b4 its like watching titanic regularly and expecting jack and rose both survive the ice and get married in a big hotel in NEW YORK,... there's been no tactical revolution, just same old boring arsenal... young mbappe ran straight for the mdf to search for more goals after scoring the first goal against manshitty, but our dear old stupid scorpion king felt he should do a little scorpion dance against Bournemouth a match he remained totally anonymous till Pérez got in..

What I saw before the match — We can not afford to drop points any more — We suffer big injuries at the back, and we really need a clean sheet to boost our confidence — We have scored in every single match except at Dortmund and Chelsea, which mean if we keep a clean sheet we are most likely win, ugly or not

By all means get his coaching badges at arsenal, let us have the benefit of his experience, perhaps he can help some of our players to score more goals.

The Sooners» next two touchdowns were scored by the somewhat more conventional means and somewhat less conventional names of Jamelle Holieway, the gifted freshman quarterback.

Arsen Wanger is encouraging everyone to score more goals but i don't hear him saying he wants everyone to help with defense, i mean who is next Petr Cech to score more goals?

If he only scores 17 or 18 whilst achieving this (given we have plenty of goalscorers who can score against lesser sides) I'd be happy with that, as it'd almost certainly mean more points.

Especially now that Ramsey has damaged his hamstring, That doesn't mean that Walcott is not capable of cutting into the box and running into goal scoring opportunitiest from here, if anything, he will end up having more opportunities, what with Giroud's hold up play from long balls.

Its NOT just Giroud its the whole strike force that are absolutly rubbish, I mean yes Giroud misses far more than he scores and that is NOT the mark of top notch striker, but Wellbeck is not the finished article and to my mind shows no signs of becoming so, He seems to suffer from this innate lack of courage, a lot like Wallcott does, in laymans terms they sh!t out when it comes to the crunch, Giroud is just not good enough to be the striker we really need on the end of Ozil's assists.

and lastly he tends to score in patches and unfortunately his lean.patches MOSTLY seem to come during crucial moments and games, its alright scoring against the Norwich and Bournemouth of the league but at the end of the day goals against tougher opponents are much more appreciated by fans and means a lot more come end of season....

Yes, that means it's entirely possible Jay Cutler will score more touchdowns for the Chiefs than Alex Smith on Sunday.

I mean he does score 10 - 12 league goals but he should be converting more chances that Ozil creates.

The feeling you get when you realize the other team couldn't move the ball only to have the ball moved on them seems more demoralizing than scoring right away and it only means the other squad has to do the same.

Arsene Wenger can must get Ben Yedder as long as he's clinical and can beat his man.I'd take him over Giroud any day and I think if Giroud is put in that Toulouse squad he won't score more goals than Ben Yedder and denying this fact would mean you choose to be blinded.We had better get him quickly.I've said it here time and time again the reason why Arsenal are not winning things with Giroud is because he's not clinical.If you guys were to ever watch his misses in every season by season since he came here you would be shocked at the kind of striker we have.But as usual he's always forgiven and people continually rate him basing it on statistics and forget he's playing for Arsenal with the likes of.......

Danny is a 15 minute player, after 15 minutes of each game he just disappears and all he does is run, close down, lose passes, he just does not give much as a striker, we down talk Giroud but he gives us more than danny, he will work hard, assist, score sometimes and bring this team mates into play... Welbeck has got the worst link up play ever, his first touch is so bad, whenever the ball gets to him we know it won't stick and that means he will be chasing down the ball due to his poor first touch.

He first said «we need to score more goals to win the PL» not entirely sure from the editing of the text whether that meant another striker (is he calling for a 20 goal striker and 2 x 25 goal strikers in the same team?!!) or our existing guys need to get their fingers out.

The article is explaining how high totals mean more randomness in scoring and volatility.

By that I don't mean more of this «we'll definitely score some time so we don't really need to try» arrogance that the players seem to have in so many of our games where we end up not doing anything until the 80th minute and then coming away with a loss or draw.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I mean a club without fans is nothing... we have power, power to show enough is enough & we're fed up of those excuses of we were unlucky & bad refereeing: the truth of the matter is if you play better regardless 9/10: you score more, you defend better & you WIN except for that odd game.

Overs went 28 -18-2 in the group stages but scoring tends to slow down as the elimination games take on more meaning.

Actually if you read the statistics properly you would realise that we go a goal down more often than not which means teams sit back and defend hence we don't score hat fills of goals!

i have said it when arsenal signed Welbeck he fits arsenal perfectly, the pace we had up front years ago is now back in the team, couple more scores like that will start building a fear factor, meaning we will have a mental edge even before a ball is kicked.

I mean, if the Thunder hit shots at their normal rate to score a few more points and win, that doesn't have any effect on Mitchell's efficiency.

No matter how you slice it, you can't run an uptempo offence with Giroud on the pitch and that means sideways soccer and an over-reliance on crosses into the box, thereby negating many of the very reasons Lacazette was on your radar in the first place... we simply aren't clinical enough from wide positions to continue with that approach, which is why many fans have been clamoring for a viable alternative to Giroud for several years... once again this isn't an attack on Giroud, he clearly has some tangible skills, but his mere presence on the pitch greatly impacts your tactical options... Giroud's weaknesses are simply highlighted by the way in which our offence now moves in a more horizontal than vertical manner, which allows most teams ample time to regroup defensively before a scoring opportunity even arises... a player of Ibra's or Benzema's ilk would have been far more effective as they had size, speed and the first touch capabilities required to for intricate link - up play... once again square peg in a round hole

he's one of my fav (arsenal) players, so i will always root for him a theo in form is even deadlier than sanchez (i do nt mean his overall play, only goals + assists,) he is able to score and assist the highest amount from any winger in the PL because thats his style of play always waiting for delivering or getting the final play whereas sanchez often comes from a deeper position similar to ramsey who in form is deadlier considering goals + assist than cazorla in the same position but overall caz brings more to the build - up

And saying Spurs should've scored more does nt automatically mean our defense was rubbish.

That's a reference, of course, to Michigan's winning score the previous year, a sign this game meant a whole lot more to the Nittany Lions than just a Big Ten W against a ranked team.

So it sounds like he is telling his team to go for attack which means that we could see yet another high - scoring game, but can we score more than West Brom?

It's just crazy that at this point in the season, we've only scored 7 goals more than Sunderland... yeah, I mean that Sunderland which is headed for relegatetion.

At 16, girls meant more to me than box scores.