Sentences with phrase «mean by errors»

I am wondering though what you mean by errors and abuses?

Not exact matches

This means that you will save money by not having to hire another analyst and that the analysis will be higher level due to the lack of human error.

That's by comparison to more than 15 million who watched the games on traditional television, which means that for the NFL, the Twitter deal was more or less a rounding error.

And all that critical infrastructure is run by error - prone humans, meaning it's vulnerable to devastating cyberattacks.

Smart, successful people are by no means immune to making mistakes; they simply have the tools in place to learn from their errors.

If a Bible verse (or discovery) is detrimental to the cause, it is either: taken out of context; is allegorical or metaphorical; refers to another verse somewhere else; is an ancient cultural anomaly; is a translation or copyist's error; means something other than what it actually says; is a mystery of god or not discernible by humans; or is just plain magic.

If a Bible verse is detrimental to the cause, it is either; (i) taken out of context; (ii) symbolic, allegorical or otherwise means something other than it says; (iii) referring to another verse somewhere else that rectifies the error; (iv) a translation or copyist's error; (v) a mystery of God not discernible by we mere humans; or (vi) just plain magic.

If a bible verse is detrimental to the cause, it is either: taken out of context; is allegorical; refers to another verse somewhere else; is a translation error; means something other than what it actually says; Is a mystery of god or not discernable by humans; or is just magic.

If a bible verse is detrimental to the cause, it is either: taken out of context; is allegorical; refers to another verse somewhere else; is an ancient cultural anomaly; is a translation or copyist's error; means something other than what it actually says; Is a mystery of god or not discernible by humans; or is just plain magic.)

I think the problem is what is meant by «error.»

But what they are really saying is: «I claim that the Bible is God's Word, and I mean by this that the Bible is literally true and without error.

By all means post it, so I can show your error inlogic and / or reason.

If a bible verse is detrimental to the cause, it is either: taken out of context; is allegorical; refers to another verse somewhere else; is a translation or copyist's error; means something other than what it actually says; Is a mystery of god or not discernable by humans; or is just plain magic.

And wherever she went, in trouble or in triumph, still she was a living spirit, the mind and voice of the Most High, «sitting in the midst of the doctors, both hearing them and asking them questions,» claiming to herself what they said rightly, correcting their errors, supplying their defects, completing their beginnings, expanding their surmises, and thus gradually by means of them enlarging the range and refining the sense of her own teaching.

It was the means by which the church was separating itself from egregious error.

If a bible verse is detrimental to the cause, it is either: taken out of context; is allegorical; refers to another verse somewhere else; is a translation or copyist's error; means something other than what it actually says; Is a mystery of god or not discernible by humans; or is just plain magic.»

By «perspective» I mean the realization that things will never be perfect In this world, that the ultimate good is unobtainable, that there is no such thing as a human cause or human institution without error and sinfulness, that only God deserves our ultimate loyalty.

Where I come fomr on this is, being that scripture ss God breathed and written by humans, is being open to there being error and therefore for the need of the Spirit in discrning meaning form textx and their application.

A strong case has been made by F. J. E. Woodbridge that Plato not only does not seriously regard his «perfect state» as realizable, but that he means to make us see the error of imposing perfection too rigorously on human fallibility.3 Edward Bellamy's Looking Backward illustrates the utopia which becomes a persuasive call to radical social reforms.4 It also illustrates one of the functions of utopian thought as a medium of realistic criticism of the present.

Error here means that the adjustment of means to end, the fulfillment of end by means, and the consequent adaptation of each succeeding occasion to the aim which is its basic identity, may be missed in this or that given instance.

I am not a Scholar by any means nor a religious person but the Church of the Lord Jesus Christ is precious to many despite its many errors.

On the contrary, he charged that the distinction, suggested by Eugene Fisher, between the Church as institution and the Church as the Body of Christ «is exactly as I feared» and means that «the Vatican's final position on the Church's «errors and failures» would be to hold ordinary Christians responsible while maintaining that the institution itself was blameless.»

By inerrant I mean, as the word suggests, without error; such that if God were interested in directing an inerrant account of the life of Andrea Yates it simply could not say «the woman heard God say that she should drown her children in the bathtub» but would have to qualify it with «the woman believed that she heard...» Without that qualifier, it would not be inerrant, it would not be «untrue but historically accurate» if God did not actually say it then saying that he intervened in human history at that point would be incorrect.

... in the said book you try by means of various subterfuges to give the impression of leaving it [Copernicanism] undecided and labeled as probable; this is still a very serious error since there is no way an opinion declared and defined contrary to divine Scripture may be probable.

The Bible was therefore believed to reveal without error the origin of the world, the meaning of history, the moral laws by which all should live, and the only path to salvation.

- If a bible verse is detrimental to the cause, it is either: taken out of context; is allegorical; refers to another verse somewhere else; is a translation or copyist's error; means something other than what it actually says; is a mystery of god or not discernible by humans; or is just plain magic.

Metaphysical error, as Hartshorne says, is recognized by its lack of positive meaning, by its failure to afford a datum of any sort for experience.

Our thought and logical processes are meant to act upon inspiration to begin understanding, but the spiritual side needs to monitor that to prevent the ego produced by the logical side from turning that to misunderstanding and downright error, for its own purposes.

The field of imagination at any rate is broad, ranging from automatic, instinctual, or reflex actions (in which the problem of meaning is virtually, but not entirely, non-existent), to more or less habitual modes of response to «natural signs,» and rising ultimately to sophisticated conceptual activity and various poetic or secondary forms of meaning — making in cultural and social significations.19 In the higher reaches of semiotic activity an increase in imaginative freedom is accompanied by a greater risk of error.

Regarding phlyogeny v. phylogenetics, if what you meant to say was that phylogeny based on morphology has been shown to be false or is confounded by unreasonably high error rates in light of phylogenetic techniques, you're patently incorrect as the prior trees based on morphology have consistently, albeit not perfectly, matched the trees produced by genetic comparisons.

If the Teacher serves as an occasion by means of which the learner is reminded, he can not help the learner to recall that he really knows the Truth; for the learner is in a state of Error.

The use of the word Jesus is not wrong, but the context of the word Jesus is corrupted by the error of the context and meaning that defines the Person and work of Jesus as revealed in the Bible.»

The problem of the church's moral and intellectual record was aggravated, in the Roman Catholic context, by the hierarchy's inability to admit to serious error in official policy (infallibility means never having to say you're sorry!).

In 1832 Pope Gregory XVI (followed by Pope Pius IX) declared that it was insane to teach that «the liberty of conscience and of worship is the peculiar right of every man... and that citizens have the right to all kinds of liberty... by which they may be enabled to manifest openly and publicly their ideas, by word of mouth, through the press or by any other means».4 In 1864 Pope Pius IX proceeded to draw up a list of the principal errors of the age which were to be condemned.

And by «failed» I mean my trial and errors racked up to number fourteen.

Perhaps when u reach the 21st century, u'd understand what we mean by «systematic errors»

not absolving Cech of all the blames but the school boy errors made by the defenders leaves a lot to be desired, I mean where are the defenders when the first Westham goal was headed in?

By all means blame the defenders for their glaring errors, but half the time they shouldn't have been PUT in that situation under extreme pressure...

I don't disagree with Bilic that individual errors need to be eliminated but that is by no means the extent, or even the most important, of the shortcomings.

Spurs, meanwhile, are not only unrelenting in their pursuit of a top - four finish — trailing Man City in fourth by just three - points, although, Harry Redknapp's men have a far inferior goal difference meaning the margin for error is minimal — but to also better a dismal north London derby record in the league of having won just two of the last 22 meetings.

Tell your child that it's okay to make mistakes and show that you mean it by accepting errors from time to time.

The changes we've seen over the last couple of months have been within the margin of error, meaning that changes can be explained away by statistical chance rather than true shifts in sentiment.

Point estimates of population parameters (e.g., mean, correlation coefficient, slope) or comparative measures (e.g., mean difference, odds ratio, hazard ratio) should be accompanied by a measure of uncertainty such as a standard error or a confidence interval.

The researchers also determined that critical, or especially noticeable, errors were also characterized by a large «mechanical work change,» meaning the prosthetic limb thought it had to do significantly more or less work than the user intended.

Perhaps the errors lay in the means by which psychologists sought to explain them.

We can confirm this by doing statistics for a lot of measurements and calculate the statistical standard error of the mean, which in our case is 850 zeptoseconds.»

Fit is given by: % Fit = (1 − NMSE) * 100, where NMSE is the normalized mean squared error.

That doesn't mean that two - thirds of cancer cases are caused by random copying errors, they said; it can take three, four or more mutations to make a cell turn malignant.

Just because something is difficult to use doesn't mean it should be avoided, sometimes you just have to learn a work - around, and I've discovered by studying and trial and error that there is an excellent work around with undecylenic acid.

I have not, by any means, mastered the art of layering, but I've definitely improved my layering skills over the years thru trial and error and inspiration from others.