Sentences with phrase «mean comments about»

Tyler uses the reunion to get some answers from Farrah about her mean comments about him and Catelynn.

Of all the things in the world that I have time to protest, I'm pretty sure that the occasional mean comment about breastfeeding is not going to rank.

Not exact matches

Huffman wrote that 70 percent of the suspicious accounts (662) had zero karma, meaning no meaningful engagement (upvotes or downvotes) from other users, while about one percent of the accounts (13) had a karma score of more than 10,000, indicating that they reached and interacted with many Reddit users by posting and commenting on the site.

But while people may have a right to express their beliefs in public, that does not mean companies can not take action when women are subjected to comments that perpetuate negative stereotypes about them based on their gender.

Monitor the comments, which will help you understand what information you need to clarify or communicate about proactively through non-press means.

What he meant was something «slightly more measured» than Elon Musk's idea of building colonies on Mars, as Recode noted in a post about Bezos's comments.

«The availability of jobs across industries underscores the need for companies to evaluate where their talent deficits are and become more strategic about how they fill these needs, whether that means reskilling their current workers, offering higher salaries to attract workers, or using data analytics to target talent with the right skills,» Ferguson comments.

3) Stories of Friends liking or commenting on a post: This update is meant to woo the users who have been complaining about the inclusion of stories of their friends liking or commenting on a post in their News Feed.

I assume the «lost in translation» comment is meant as a joke about the fact that some hispanics speak a different language?

I would still like you to explain your comment about promiscuity (I'm going to as.sume you mean someone who has casual se.x, correct me if that's not the case) and personal responsibility.

Sometimes we say things we don't mean and I think the comment your mum made about you was one of them.

There is actual possibility - which you are talking about and which I am talking about in this sentence about «2 possible meanings,» and then there is also theoretical possibility - which I thought it was obvious that I was talking about with respect to my comments on a / theory / of time.

Commenting on criticism surround the Virgin Birth, Very Rev Michael Sadgrove said: «He wasn't deconstructing the meaning of the Gospel, he wasn't in any way devaluing what the tradition has to say about faith.

i mean its not like my comment here is relevant to any thing were talking about so forget about it.

I am not sure what you mean with your comment about human reason.

Romney's comment was perhaps well meant, but taken in the context of all of his ideas about women, that they must be taken care of because they are fragile, delicate creatures, who can't think or care for themselves and are better fit for staying home and taking care of the offspring than out in the work force, the words mirror his general condescending attitude toward women.

Regarding your comment about a «psychic safety valve», just because something is true in one way does not mean it is not true in another way.

I mean, all you wanted to do was come in, offer several terribly unflattering insinuations about everyone who has been commenting negatively regarding Tony Jones (most especially Julie), disguise them as high - minded concern for truth and justice, and get out no worse for wear.

So when Kim shared a small piece of her own story about leaving the institutionalized church and connecting to a less traditional community of believers, I mixed the well - meaning, thoughtful critiques in the comment section with some of the messages I've been getting from critics lately, and this is what I heard:

And your comment about psychotherapy aside, I do believe you carry a chip on your shoulder which often causes you to read into other's posts an intent or motive beyond their meaning.

The earlier comment using John 6:40: this was spoken BEFORE the resurrection of Jesus, so talking about it at that point would have meant nothing to them.

ops sorry i meant Amniculi... blah blah blah about Poe's Law,, its hypocrisy!!!!!! talk trash about Christianity should be able to do the same about Islam, not encourging it just saying do nt be scare!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! do it will its not a felony yet, cause soon you wont be able too... Let me be clear, I meant express your opinions, comments about any religion as you do about Christianity, plus Im not religious, i just believe in jesus christ son of god and the word of the bible which is difference religion is made by people...

People kill me with some of their comments, just because they don't concern their selves with the outside world doesn't mean they don't know and hear about what's happening in it.

Rex i do nt disagree that the Lord is returning i am looking forward to that nor about John the baptist but i am saved i think it is dangerous to tell people they are not saved by a few comments you do nt agree with.whether you know the word well or go to church or even do good works is no guarantee that you are saved that just means you are religious.It is only by faith in Jesus Christ that all are saved and not by works brentnz

When he commented - in response to the usual question about why he was so unreasonably opposed to condoms as a means of fighting Aids - that in fact condomdistribution isn't helping, and may be worsening, the spread of HIV / AIDS in Africa, he provoked an avalanche of hostile comment, much of it almost hysterical in tone.

Appearing as they do in the context of vigorous debates among Roman Catholics about Pope Francis's leadership of the Church, Rose's comments are clearly meant to be taken not only as a criticism of Taylor but more specifically as the apology for «traditional» Christianity that Rose «regret [s] to say» he doesn't find in Taylor.

My comment about avoiding the contemplation of the motivations of Satan was meant in comparison to spending time on studying more uplifting concepts, not avoiding understanding the enemy.

I'm not commenting on Wendy's integrity or her value as a person or her willingness to engage other viewpoints... we're talking about the damage done when an entire organization commits itself to helping others «manage their identity» or «address the pro-gay paradigm,» whatever that means.

Hillel Halkin, who does live in Israel and who writes regularly for Commentary and the New York Sun, comments: «If expressing his opinions about American Jews meant hurting their feelings, [Yehoshua] should have picked another time and place for it.»

The comment about Christians being only Republican, only meant that the majority of Christian Republicans are fundamentalist Evangelicans and are against the GLBT having the same rights as anyone else.

whhops, my comment about McKenna's disciples was meant to be a reply to Marc F's sensible comment about 2012

But, upon thinking about it, I decided that nothing is more appropriate than interrupting our comments about the debate over homosexuality with ten - word reminders of the hope of the gospel, which gives every conversation new depth and meaning.

On Facebook, we talked about how Christian unity might mean redeeming conflict rather than avoiding it (some really fantastic comments there) and we also discussed an interesting C.S. Lewis quote.

I don't mean this as any continuation of my complaint about the comments on Commonweal, but as a general question to which I don't know the answer.

Anyway, comments appeared on two Commonweal threads that were outrageously offensive about people associated with First Things, and I whined about how that means everybody associated with Commonweal hates us.

However, I think some of the comments about «Trig» are rather mean.

Your comment about the probes on what the hoods ~ really ~ mean crack me up.

Comments like that make it all worthwhile < 3 I know what you mean about complicated flour mixtures, I find some gf recipes rather daunting.

Anonymous's comment and HS's response about deleting «mean - spirited» posts explains something to me.

It seems Kathy's response was meant for Emily's comment about using the microwave to soften the squash for cutting.

Based on the comments about texture / melting too quickly, I would wonder about using part melted white chocolate and not use any honey as a combined sweeetner / means of adding structure?

An injury to Toby Alderweireld means Dier is set for a run in Tottenham's defence, while Southgate's comments about his intended style of play suggest he may fancy the Spurs man at the back.

Although many will suggest that Robson has a personal vendetta of sorts aimed squarely at the Grinch who stole soccer, that doesn't make his words any less truthful... such tactics are nothing new... in the U.S.this business practice has become so common that even the players regularly use the media to manipulate public opinion (LeBron James did likewise to rally public support for himself and away from his teammate, Kyrie Irving, who has asked to be traded)... whether for contract leverage or to rally support for or against certain players, this strategy can be incredibly effective at times, but when it misses the mark it can be dangerously divisive... for a close - to - the - vest team like Arsenal to use such nefarious means to manufacture a wedge between the fans and it's best player (again), is absolutely despicable... for the sanctimonious higher - ups who demand that it's players adhere to a certain protocol regarding information deemed «in house» or else to intentionally spread «fake» news or to provide certain outlets with privileged information for such purposes is pretty low indeed... no moral high ground here, just a big club pretending to be a small club so that they can continue to pull the wool over the eyes of a dedicated, albeit somewhat naive, fan base... so not only does this club no give a shit about it's fans, this clearly shows that clubs primary interests aren't even soccer related... for all intent and purposes Kroenke doesn't care if we're a soccer club or a tampon factory as long as we continue to maximized his investment... stay woke people... great to see more and more people commenting on the state of the franchise... this club needs to be held accountable for it's actions

Wenger made the comment about keeping Gazidis on a leash and people assumed it meant not spending as much, for me it is to stop him from buying trash and clogging up the team with players not good enough for AFC, that leash worked well this year as we didn't panic buy a Perez.

yeah, sorry, was meant to be tongue - in - cheek reply to above comment if he's complaining about «being babied» after tonight's game then would seem like he's very, very likely playing Thursday

Me commenting on the article and saying I don't care about this would not mean that I secretly care.

I would like to tell arsenal fan that the transfer window is not arsenal's problem.Let explain what is in my mind.We need to reinforce our team but we need to think in the future that most of the high class players are going to refuse signing for arsenal fc because of Mr Wenger's philosophy.It looks like arsenal becomes cemetery of players.How many players came in and left because of performance, became good players out of arsenal.We need to accept all of the transformation Mr wenger brings in arsenal but now it does not work.Why??? because lack of tactics, strategies and pretending best players for Mr wenger mind but in reality those players do not get standard of best player.Mr wenger wants to prove everybody that he is wright that players who are calling by wenger are best.I means Mr wenger is the only one can see all matter in good position or bad.He is wrong by thinking this way.He does not like criticism.he is the mind of arsenal.Everything he can say or defend is wright.Think about morrinho comments about arsenal!!!! Why he likes to be arsenal coach!!!! One thing I want to say about arsenal players, I think everybody watch arsenal games.We have got short mind players who play two good games and the rest shameless.They are working hard in the training ground for catching Mr wenger's mind to let them play; what is behind their (players) mind to be the most regular players.Those players have no vision even ambition; they are never becoming high class and their carriers are going to finish in arsenal after arsenal we are going to see them playing for championship.They do not care to become legend as Ian wright, Vierra, Berckam, piress, Henry... What is the big behind their mind to use wenger name to be selected in national team.They are not able to face different leagues in the world.

thanks for the sensible comment fatboy yep i know i do get that they do nt really mean it, but i just cant come to terms with that, i do nt really expect civilised culture in a sport but generally from the people in the world, yep you are right about the real world, maybe thats the reason it annoys me extremely, i mean look our world is rotten to the core, the human mindset is terrible when it faces danger or problems for himself, and maybe thats the reason i just want football to stay as just as an entertainment industry but when i see that people even here let the words flow in any kind of way just because the are frustrated, i really cant come to terms with it, i really love black humor and some akbs react angrily when some fans tell some wheelchair jokes or for example on the post from admin where one could write jokes about wenger, some were really awesome, but when people cant control their emotion after a game and abuse other people it just irritates me as hell cause i really think that thats one of the big problems in the world..

But just because I don't want to spend around # 100 to watch awful football anymore, doesn't mean I do not have the right to comment about our plight.

I'm worried about recent comments where he said Welbeck and Giroud can play together doesn't mean Wenger really thinks in his deluded mind that that pair could be the same as Henry and Bergkamp.