Those posts sparked some intense debate in the comments and offline about the increasing influence of foreign profits on corporate profit margins, and how this change may have permanently shifted up
the mean for corporate profits as a proportion of GDP.
Not exact matches
If we think of the corporation (
for -
profit or otherwise) as an instrument or technology by
means of which people seek to achieve their goals, then it becomes clear that the rights (or «rights») of different kinds of
corporate persons depend not on what kind of entity they are, but on the the demonstrable goals of the human beings involved.
And lower taxes
for corporations should
mean higher
corporate profits, which should boost the value of stocks.
GWW is not quite as cheap as some of the other stocks on this list, with a PEBV of 1.2, which
means the market expects
profits to grow by no more than 20 % from current levels
for the remainder of its
corporate life.
The exigencies of
corporate life naturally chose
profit - seeking over disposal and that
meant expanding the market, finding more ways to use soy ingredients in processing and convincing more people to pay money
for soy - based imitation foods.
Corporate education «reformers»» self - interest, by contrast,
means advocating
for policies that help private corporations
profit off of public schools, diverting public attention from an anti-poverty economic agenda, and busting unions that prevent total oligarchical control of America's political system.
Corporate profit margins are presently 70 percent above the historical
mean going back to 1947, as I've discussed earlier (see,
for example, Warren Buffett, Jeremy Grantham, and John Hussman...
Corporate profit margins are presently 70 percent above the historical mean going back to 1947, as I've discussed earlier (see, for example, Warren Buffett, Jeremy Grantham, and John Hussman on Profit, GDP and Competi
profit margins are presently 70 percent above the historical
mean going back to 1947, as I've discussed earlier (see,
for example, Warren Buffett, Jeremy Grantham, and John Hussman on
Profit, GDP and Competi
Profit, GDP and Competition).
I've posted here regularly about the implications of
mean reversion in elevated
profit margins (see, for example, The Temptation To Abandon Proven Models In Speculative and Fearful Markets: Why This Time Isn't Different, What Record Corporate Profit Margins Imply For Future Profitability and The Stock Market, Warren Buffett, Jeremy Grantham, and John Hussman on Profit, GDP and Competi
profit margins (see,
for example, The Temptation To Abandon Proven Models In Speculative and Fearful Markets: Why This Time Isn't Different, What Record Corporate Profit Margins Imply For Future Profitability and The Stock Market, Warren Buffett, Jeremy Grantham, and John Hussman on Profit, GDP and Competitio
for example, The Temptation To Abandon Proven Models In Speculative and Fearful Markets: Why This Time Isn't Different, What Record
Corporate Profit Margins Imply For Future Profitability and The Stock Market, Warren Buffett, Jeremy Grantham, and John Hussman on Profit, GDP and Competi
Profit Margins Imply
For Future Profitability and The Stock Market, Warren Buffett, Jeremy Grantham, and John Hussman on Profit, GDP and Competitio
For Future Profitability and The Stock Market, Warren Buffett, Jeremy Grantham, and John Hussman on
Profit, GDP and Competi
Profit, GDP and Competition).
For example, California imposes its own flat tax of 8.84 % on
corporate profits which
means that fifty percent of your
profit will be used to pay federal and state income taxes.