While education reformers were busy last week writing about what the election of Donald Trump would
mean for education policy, Chalkbeat's Elizabeth Green wrote about what the election results meant for education reformers.
So what does this political earthquake
mean for education policy?
And most importantly, let me know what you make of this list, and
its meaning for the education policy debate today.
Not exact matches
The implementation of the Free SHS
policy, President Akufo - Addo, added would
mean that Sustainable Development Goal 4, which aims at ensuring inclusive and equitable quality
education and promoting lifelong learning opportunities
for all, will be within Ghana's reach by the target date of 2030.
Critics of recent cross-party plans to introduce free higher
education have dismissed it as a «middle class subsidy» and ignored what the
policy would
mean for people in my situation.
«There's no question that the Trump administration's
policies are
meant to damage progressive states such as ours,» Mulgrew told the assembled legislators, calling
for a $ 1.5 billion investment in state
education aid and «a state budget that protects our children and public schools.»
Lady Brinton, a Lib Dem peer, said: «The Government's higher
education policy means that
for the first time since fees were introduced, they won't pay a penny up front.
Their analysis suggests that «from the perspective of US science
education and innovation
policy, visa restrictions
for foreign students should not be applied uniformly or on the basis of financial
means; they ought to account
for student - quality differences.»
When Congress set aside land
for education as part of its plan
for the Northwest Territories, it justified its
policy as follows: «Religion, morality and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the
means of
education shall forever be encouraged.»
Republicans seized control of the U.S. House of Representatives and significantly bolstered their majorities in the Senate in Tuesday's election, an outcome that will almost certainly
mean an end to emergency
education aid to states and will heighten pressure
for a more limited federal role in K - 12
policy.
Between midday on 4th and 14th December, all donations online can be doubled, which
means in the future twice as many teachers could be learning about child rights and gender - based violence, twice as many communities learning about the importance of girls»
education, twice as many school - boards understanding and enforcing national
policies aimed at supporting girls, and hopefully twice as many girls could be making that crucial transition from primary to secondary school, become shining beacons
for hundreds of other women and girls who dream of a better future but wonder if it's possible.
For education, that
means the continuation of pernicious
policies imposed by the Office of Civil Rights (OCR), along with litigation destructive to schooling.
«One year of training
means very little,» says Adelman, a senior associate with the Institute
for Higher
Education Policy, in Washington.
Federal courts have played a key role in the development of special
education policy by interpreting what Congress wrote in IDEA three decades ago, and the Supreme Court is reviewing what the law means by a «free appropriate public education» as it considers Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, which deals with the standard of services districts are required to provide (see «Examining the Standards for Special Education» legal beat, Summ
education policy by interpreting what Congress wrote in IDEA three decades ago, and the Supreme Court is reviewing what the law
means by a «free appropriate public
education» as it considers Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, which deals with the standard of services districts are required to provide (see «Examining the Standards for Special Education» legal beat, Summ
education» as it considers Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, which deals with the standard of services districts are required to provide (see «Examining the Standards
for Special
Education» legal beat, Summ
Education» legal beat, Summer 2017).
What does the appointment of Betsy DeVos
mean for future federal
education policy and initiatives?
Mike Petrilli talks with Hill and Jochim about this proposal, what it would
mean for policy and practice at the federal, state, and local levels, and the prospects
for its adoption in this edition of The
Education Next Book Club.
What does the appointment of Betsy DeVos
mean for future federal
education policy and...
Through the stories of these two schools he addresses the
meaning of community in multicultural America, the pros and cons of school choice, and what this all
means for today's big
education policy debates.
For instance, 230 million pounds were wasted on a
policy known as
Education Action Zones that was
meant to encourage partnerships between business and schools in deprived areas.
Using children with disabilities to increase public support
for vouchers may be smart politics, but it doesn't
mean that special
education vouchers are good
policy.
All of us who work in
education or
policy can also think of plenty of times when foundations have felt uncomfortably pushy, and when all the talk of «mission alignment» and «strategic focus» seems to
mean, «It's time to get with the program, if you know what's good
for you.»
Michael McShane is research fellow in
education policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute and coeditor with Frederick Hess of Common Core Meets Education Reform: What It All Means for Politics, Policy, and the Future of Schooling (Teachers College Pres
education policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute and coeditor with Frederick Hess of Common Core Meets Education Reform: What It All Means for Politics, Policy, and the Future of Schooling (Teachers College Press,
policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute and coeditor with Frederick Hess of Common Core Meets
Education Reform: What It All Means for Politics, Policy, and the Future of Schooling (Teachers College Pres
Education Reform: What It All
Means for Politics,
Policy, and the Future of Schooling (Teachers College Press,
Policy, and the Future of Schooling (Teachers College Press, 2013).
For Trump, it
means navigating how
education policy is shaped by all three branches of government.
This
means that the next president and congress (as well as governors and state legislatures) have the opportunity to use
education for bipartisan
policy efforts that will unify, rather than fracture, diverse groups.
Ferfolja adds: «There is also a [New South Wales Department of
Education] document called the Controversial Issues in Schools
policy and that also talks about having to get parental permission if you're going to raise a controversial issue, sensitive topic — so what does that actually
mean for teachers?
It's August, which can only
mean one thing: it's time
for our annual list of top
education -
policy Twitter feeds.
They will discuss the latest legislation and what it
means for education, providing a summary of the key issues arising from
policy, along with the latest progress and developments in SEND.
The federal government is most certainly guilty as well
for creating an alphabet soup of acronyms that bogs down stories about national
education policy with explanations and parentheticals about what all the abbreviations
mean before readers ever get to the point of whether the
policies are actually working.
While the national discourse focuses on the merits of school choice initiatives in their own right and
for their own sakes, as leaders of state and local
education systems, as educators of diverse regional, political, and professional backgrounds, we believe that these
policies are better thought of as
means to critical ends, and that the goal of these and other
education policies should be, above all else, the enhancement of skills
for America's youngest generation and expanded opportunity
for children to thrive as adults.
The use of
mean scores places the focus on improving the academic achievement of all students within a school and not just those whose performance is around the state proficiency cut score (Center
for Education Policy, 2011).
In light of the news of Tony Bennett's resignation, Fordham asked several top
education -
policy analysts to explore what the resignation would
mean for school accountability going forward.
Various studies in the 1970s and 80s described the limits of higher levels of authority in the governance structure
for education, and the relatively weak impact of state
policy on student outcomes.294 But loose coupling does not
mean that no influence flows from superordinate entities.295 Even as schools are busy developing their own
policies and initiatives, they pay attention to demands from «outside the system» when those demands are consistent with the directions in which their organizations are already moving.296
Therefore, although the state put forth a new vision in its regulations, the 2005
policy and its subsequent revisions leave significant space
for district and charter schools to define what competency - based
education means for their students.
So, what's all this
mean for schooling,
education, and
education policy?
I've already explained what last night's election results will
mean for federal
education policy.
Max Eden, a senior fellow of
education policy at the Manhattan Institute, wrote a guest blog for Education Week on what the «ESSA epoch» means for
education policy at the Manhattan Institute, wrote a guest blog
for Education Week on what the «ESSA epoch» means for
Education Week on what the «ESSA epoch»
means for students.
Advocates have also criticized what they describe as the limited scope of the state panel's inquiry — which was
meant to determine whether the district's electronic system
for individualized special
education plans, data collection requirements, budget process or transportation
policies unlawfully delayed or denied services.
The study, released by a group that advocates
for environmentally - sound buildings, is
meant to draw attention to the condition of buildings that on weekdays house some 56 million students and teachers — more than one - sixth of the U.S. population — but that nevertheless attract little attention in the national debate over
education policy and reform.
That it
means pushing
for a rollback of federal
education policy that have helped black and brown children as well as a return to the bad old days when states and districts were allowed to ignore their obligations to poor and minority children doesn't factor into any of their thinking.
Utah labor unions, teachers rally
for public schools
Education > March
meant to oppose school
policies and budget cuts sought by Trump and
Education Secretary Betsy DeVos.
That lack of commitment to any real
education policies beyond not cutting budgets
meant that while Laws came across as knowledgeable, there was no concrete future vision
for education.
Corporate
education «reformers»» self - interest, by contrast,
means advocating
for policies that help private corporations profit off of public schools, diverting public attention from an anti-poverty economic agenda, and busting unions that prevent total oligarchical control of America's political system.
While
education reform has taken on different
meanings over time, the current movement
for reform supports
policies including:
Ryan Smith, Director of
Education Programs and
Policy at the United Way of Greater Los Angeles, the coalition organizer, said the ad was
meant to push members to increase funding and build public support
for the effort.
Constant change in
education policy has
meant that teachers haven't been given the time to get to grips with one initiative properly before it is changed
for another, in a way they are less «expert» at their jobs.
So,
education policy - watchers, if you're wondering what Tuesday's results might
mean for education reform, here are some races to look out
for:
Meaning, within hours of each other,
Education Secretary Duncan said the President believes that «No teacher should have to teach to the test,» while the Governor of Connecticut, who said he has no problems with teaching to the test as long as the scores go up, is named chair of the committee developing education policy for governors and thei
Education Secretary Duncan said the President believes that «No teacher should have to teach to the test,» while the Governor of Connecticut, who said he has no problems with teaching to the test as long as the scores go up, is named chair of the committee developing
education policy for governors and thei
education policy for governors and their states.
The fact is that Bill Finch will undoubtedly pay a political price
for failing to listen to what the pro-public
education advocates have been saying, but sadly, it is a small price compared to the price Bridgeport's public school students have had to pay as a result of the City's misguided and
mean - spirited
policies.
That they continuously backed Obama's reckless, shoddy, bumbling, and counterproductive No Child waiver gambit, which essentially eviscerated the law and paved the way
for congressional Republicans and traditionalists to pass the Every Student Succeeds Act,
means that the best of the president's political legacy on
education policy (including Race to the Top) will probably end up in history's ashbin.
Critics and supporters of school choice
policies alike have raised concerns about what your proposed expansion of school choice could
mean for the future of public
education in the United States.