Sentences with phrase «mean having more energy»

Does it mean having more energy for your kids or grandkids?

Rob has been training for this throughout our short spring, so he didn't find this route as challenging as me... which meant he had more energy when we arrived home.

It also allows mommy to get more rest in the night overall, which means she has more energy and ability to take of herself and her husband, rather than being up all night with baby and then too exhausted to even look at her husband for months on end.

The ease and simplicity that accompanied the downsize showed Bea that living with less meant having more energy for the important things — picnics, hikes, and outings with loved ones.

We believe that Aaptiv should be a tool that helps you live the rest of your life better, whether that means having more energy to play with your kids or going on a hike with a friend.

Not exact matches

After months (well, technically, closer to a decade) of wait for an official Republican plan to replace Obamacare, the House Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means committees unleashed legislation dubbed the American Health Care Act (AHCA) late Monday that would nix the existing health law's unpopular mandate to buy insurance and pare back its far more popular expansion of Medicaid for the working poor, among other provisions.

Today, Uncharted Play has evolved beyond energy - generating soccer balls (and jump ropes) to power the developing world with a new, more widely scalable means of creating motion - based, off - grid renewable energy.

This means home owners will be able to maximize the use of their stored energy and have a more efficient storage system.

The Party has also removed the cap on wind power to encourage the development of more non-renewable wind energy; initiated studies on the feasibility of carbon capture and storage as a means of disposing carbon dioxide emissions; and provided grants to promote the bio-energy industry.

He says his principle of «reverence for life» is broader and therefore more «colourless» than what love has meant in the tradition, «but it has the same energies within it».58

While runners, cyclists, and other endurance athletes have long known that eating carbohydrates during and immediately preceding hard efforts helps to replenish energy - providing glycogen stores, newer research shows that combining these carbohydrates with a wallop of protein nearly doubles the insulin response — meaning even more energy can be stored in the body along with all the muscle - making perks.

Carbs are what give our body energy and actually have a lot lower caloric value compared to protein and fats, which means you can eat more carbs!

Incorporating this metabolism - revving food into your breakfast means you'll have more energy to start your day and fly through that mid-morning slump.

Not only does the sweet potato have a lower glycemic index than the traditional white potato (meaning it will be deployed as energy to your body at a more steady state), it is also packed with other nutrition that benefits athletes including vitamins A and C, manganese, calcium, potassium, iron, vitamin B6 and fiber.

All the hype about the difference in the weigh cut just means that Joanna had more energy to bounce up and down and whif shots while Rose effectively counter-punched with harder blows and fucked up her rhythm.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

This means you have to output more energy to use these fibers.

One thing I recall about the first year after Ryan was born, was that, it was still the Ben show, essentially that Ryan fed, and napped on the go much more than Ben did as an infant, because Ben was in charge, I mean he had a personality and we needed to make sure that he got his energy out.

It focused on cultural experiences and attitudes — hostility to the rules and regulations of social liberalisation, national pride and racial prejudice and wrapped an appeal to economic experiences within it: Britain would be better off economically because Britain is great; freeing ourselves of fussy and politically correct regulation would release economic energy; stopping immigration would mean there's more money to go around.

Labour MP Caroline Flint has said that independence would mean higher energy bills in Scotland, as its customers would have to pay more to support renewable energy in Scotland, which represents one third of the UK total.

The Government has a commitment to eradicate fuel poverty in all UK households by 2016, however rising energy prices mean there are now around 1.5 million more households in fuel poverty than there were at this time last year.

Tony Perks, Chair of the CIOB's Building Control and Standards Faculty said, «For some time the CIOB has promoted the use of consequential improvements as a means of making the existing building stock more energy efficient.

This means that the energy consumption and carbon footprint of marijuana growers would go way down, as the light the plants need for photosynthesis could be provided more naturally by the sun.

That means the men who have maintained their research activities and who «have more energy» if they aren't chasing after demanding children at the end of a hard day of lab work.

New U.S. regulations, starting January 1, cap energy consumption of a roughly 1,600 - lumen bulb (equivalent to a standard 100 - watt incandescent bulb) at 72 watts — which means the workhorse of home lighting will have to become about 30 percent more efficient overnight.

In short, Baez says, while we may be able to get energy from the vacuum, success «would mean the universe is far more unstable than we ever dreamed.»

Dr Dillon said: «This means they are healthier as they have more energy, can live longer and bite more people.»

Hence that means the planet's population will more than triple in my own lifetime, which also has its own energy resource implications.

Does this mean human civilisation has to restrict itself to using no more than a few hundred terawatts of energy?

The NIST synapse's combination of small size, superfast spiking signals, low energy needs and 3 - D stacking capability could provide the means for a far more complex neuromorphic system than has been demonstrated with other technologies, according to the paper.

In a randomized clinical study involving adults age 56 to 71 that recently published in Neurobiology of Aging, researchers found that after cognitive training, participants» brains were more energy efficient, meaning their brain did not have to work as hard to perform a task.

Alternatively, a smaller wing area could mean that foraging bees have to expend more energy in flight, which in turn accelerates their ageing.

Making these applications faster and more accurate has generally meant throwing more number - crunching capacity at them, but one Cambridge, Mass. — based start - up claims to have developed a cheaper and more energy - efficient approach that eschews digital processing.

Control basically means it doesn't explode, it just moves along slowly and produces heat and you can then use that heat, and they've been working on this for decades and decades now and getting closer and closer to the point where they're producing actually more energy than they put into the experiment.

Audible.com features more than 100,000 titles including science books you've been meaning to check out like Kevin Dutton's The Wisdom of Psychopaths: What Saints, Spies and Serial Killers Can Teach Us About Success and Richard Panek's The Four Percent Universe: Dark Matter, Dark Energy and the Race to Discover the Rest of Reality.

«I'm hopeful this is the beginning of a trend,» he said, referring to emissions in the U.S. «The fact that countries like Germany have so dramatically lowered their carbon emissions with mechanisms like feed - in tariffs that incentivize non-fossil-fuel energy, and the fact that the West Coast and Northeast states here in the U.S. are investing more in renewable energy means that we ought to be seeing a decrease in emissions.

That means, for a coal plant, we'd have to burn — and so pay for — an extra 10 - 40 % more coal with CCS than we would without it, and the electricity from that extra energy / coal consumed is not available to consumers for electricity.

This means that we'll have more energy and will just look, feel, and be healthier and happier as a result.

However, having no accurate information about your body's energy balance in the first place could make walking 10,000 steps, 20,000 or even 30,000 a useless pursuit and may not be enough to trigger any drastic fat loss decrease or body composition changes, even if walking more steps means more calories burned.

One study published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology found that activities such as hiking, cycling and running in nature have been associated with greater feelings of revitalisation, increased energy, and a reduction in feelings of anger, confusion and depression — meaning you are more likely to make it out the door to work out.

For centuries people have turned to meditation as a means of becoming more aware of themselves and tapping into an energy greater than their own.

A low GI diet means that your blood glucose level will be more stable and this will have positive effects in both mood and energy.

People who juice regularly have more energy and stamina, and improved immune function, which will mean fewer colds.

However, ketosis only occurs once the body no longer has the means to use carbohydrates or more pointedly glucose as its first choice energy source.

Additionally, since you're consuming six small meals, I'd argue that you simply most likely by no means really feel «full,» and also you is likely to be MORE prone to eat further energy throughout every snack.

As we've all heard before, muscles work harder than fat so more muscle would mean that we're also spending more energy (or calories) even at rest.

The combination of these benefits means that not only do you have more mitochondria to make energy, but those mitochondria have a better fuel source.

The more work you do, the less energy you will have to do it, and obviously this means that if fatigue builds up you will have little energy to actually train.

This means when the body begins to convert fat into ketones, you actually have a much more stable and sustainable energy source.

With stored Creatine, the body is able to produce the workout energy source known as ATP during high intensity workout which means that the body has more power made available to to lift more and do more.