Not exact matches
So that
means that it is God is responsible for those
women being guilty of murder according to «Sanct.ity of
Human Life Act: H.R. 212» which says that life starts at fertilization and guarantees that life full protection under the law.
Info, you
mean in America
woman has the choice to slaughter another
human being just because he or she is still inside her.
Secondly, made in the divine image, men and
women must actively reflect the Trinity in order to become fully
human and this
means they must give themselves away in a constant communion of love.
John Paul saw how
women can continue Christ's selfless love in a way that teaches the world the
meaning of holiness and true
human happiness.
We are made male and female, man and
woman, and attempts to blur distinctions under the seemingly innocuous term «gender» are really attempts to assert that sex should be seen as an autonomous
human activity, something which has noother
meaning than what the individual wishes to bestow upon it.
(2358) It does, however, teach that the
meaning of
human sexuality is found within the context of the life - long commitment of one man and one
woman whose love (when enacted sexually) is potentially pro-creative.
These interesting facts combined seem to suggest that the
human body was
meant for sexual pleasure both internally and externally for both men and
women.
What availed as the common wisdom of mankind until the day before yesterday — for example, that man,
woman, mother, and father name natural realities as well as social roles, that children issue naturally from their union, that the marital union of man and
woman is the foundation of
human society and provides the optimal home for the flourishing of children — all this is now regarded by many as obsolete and even hopelessly bigoted, as court after court, demonstrating that this revolution has profoundly transformed even the
meaning of reason itself, has declared that this bygone wisdom now fails even to pass the minimum legal threshold of rational cogency.
«We wanted to feature a
woman's voice,» a well -
meaning conference planner will inform me with excitement, as if mine is sufficient to capture the experiences of 3.5 billion
human beings.
In a century that had seen two hideous world wars and innumerable examples of massive
human suffering, John Paul established a new Feast of Divine Mercy, giving men and
women a practical
means of accessing the forgiveness of a loving God.
But these were largely asides, and were clearly distinguished from the discussions about what really grasped Wieman's own soul — the urgent demand that men and
women commit themselves without reservation to the process of creative interchange which creates
human good through the increase of qualitative
meaning.
I do indeed believe, but I believe as one of a great company of men and
women, from many ages, of all races and classes, rich and poor, simple and learned, who in one way or another have been drawn to find the truest key to the
meaning and purpose of
human existence given focal expression in Jesus Christ.
Radha is parakiya, another - man's
woman, (6) and her liaison with Krishna, whatever its powerful
meaning in mystical allegory, is plainly adulterous (7) in
human terms.
And when
women, dancing Sarah's circle, affirm the importance of relationships in
human life, they are doing more than reflecting
women's psychology; they are showing all Christians what it
means to be created in God's image.
In outlining the
meaning of
human existence we have spoken of the patent truth that the events in the world, and especially men and
women in that world, are dependent and not independent.
We live in a world where many of the things the Bible says — God made everything,
human beings are responsible for the world's problems, God chose Israel as his special people, sex is only
meant for one man and one
woman in marriage, Jesus is the only way to God, the wages of sin is death, God is going to judge the earth one day, and so on — are profoundly unpopular.
fosters an insatiable avarice, generates false values and needs by its global culture, kills
humans due to poverty, malnutrition and violence, exploits
women and children, denies to many the basic
human right to life and the
means of living a decent
human life.
Thérèse Souga from Cameroon says that «Christ is the true
human, the one who makes it possible for all persons to reach fulfillment and to overcome the historic alienations weighing them down... The realism of the cross every day tells me, as a
woman of the Third World, that the laws of history can be overcome by
means of crucified love.»
Women gave the concept of «
human» a
meaning beyond the dichotomy of male and female.
In preparation for Super Bowl LXVI in Indianapolis, 11 congregations of Catholic
women joined the fight against
human trafficking in a unique way: They decided to use their investments as a
means to address
human trafficking with Indianapolis area hotels.
In the first place such education, now as always, is concerned with the nurture of men and
women whose business in life it will be to help men to see their immediate perplexities, joys and sufferings in the light of an ultimate
meaning, to live as citizens of the inclusive society of being, and to relate their present choices to first and last decisions made about them in the totality of
human history by Sovereign Power.
Having a
woman's body gives us a unique insight into what it
means to be
human, for our bodies are what is most immediately finite about us all.
First it requires us to find and describe what Tillich called the «boundary situations,» that is, those points where modern men and
women reach the limits of their
human existence, where they sense they are alienated from society and other people, or feel a lack of personal
meaning, or fear being useless and having no worth.2.
This blunt and provocative book, now a best seller, is
meant to shake up what Manji calls mainstream Islam, to which she puts her honest questions about fundamentalist attitudes toward
women,
human rights, Jews, the U.S. and even the Qur» an.
By inerrant I
mean, as the word suggests, without error; such that if God were interested in directing an inerrant account of the life of Andrea Yates it simply could not say «the
woman heard God say that she should drown her children in the bathtub» but would have to qualify it with «the
woman believed that she heard...» Without that qualifier, it would not be inerrant, it would not be «untrue but historically accurate» if God did not actually say it then saying that he intervened in
human history at that point would be incorrect.
It would
mean there would be some morning when a
woman could be told that if she'd gone to a clinic the previous afternoon, it would have been all right to have an abortion, because the baby she now carries was not then a
human being.
Women's liberation can
mean «
human liberation.»
Today's Europe is rapidly becoming de-Christianised, and even our ideas on what it
means to be
human, as men and
women, somehow seem dissociated from previous understanding.
«It is necessary that the Heir of the Ages come into his own through the womb of
woman, so that the
human nature of man may be the perfect
means of the action and hallowing of God in Person upon «his own» (cf. Jn 1, 11) and upon the material order itself, through mankind.
If you answer that it is a choice, that
means that every
human — including yourself — is equally attracted to both men and
women.
Though, in the absence of
woman, he may know nothing of his maleness or its
meaning, the first
human being seems to have been male.
The norm is
meant to protect people» especially
women and children» from the fickleness of
human nature and to ensure that children have a mother and father.
We give witness that the Church's teachings — on the dignity of the
human person and the value of
human life from conception to natural death; on the
meaning of
human sexuality, the significance of sexual difference and the complementarity of men and
women; on openness to life and the gift of motherhood; and on marriage and family founded on the indissoluble commitment of a man and a
woman — provide a sure guide to the Christian life, promote
women's flourishing, and serve to protect the poor and most vulnerable among us.
John Paul II captures this situation well: «I would say that lust is a deception of the
human heart in the perennial call of man and
woman to communion by
means of mutual giving» (TB, 148).
Like most UN
human rights treaties, its implementation by state parties is overseen by a compliance committee, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against
Women, which issues «General Comments»
meant to guide our understanding of the provisions contained in the treaty, and which conducts periodic reviews of state parties, instructing them how to change their laws in order to comply better with the treaty, as understood by the Committee.
First, it requires exploring with people what theologian Paul Tillich called the «boundary situations,» those points at which modern men and
women reach the limits of their
human existence, where they sense a lack of personal
meaning, or fear being useless and worthless.
Everything else we take our chance on; everything else, including man's relative insignificance in the world, is mere probability:» If one believes in the world - embracing love of God, what does this
mean for
human relationships, for the dignity of
women, for the plight of the economically, politically and racially oppressed?
I do not
mean to say that the single adult — bachelor, maiden lady, divorced man or
woman, widow or widower — is somehow less
human.
Not only would ectogenesis — the process of growing a fetus outside a
human body in an artificial womb — save
women and babies from those dangers, but just as assisted reproductive
means have allowed the rise in fatherless births and mothers by choice, it would also make it much easier for men — gay, trans, hetero, whatever — to have children without needing a surrogate.
I
mean, think about it: some
women are able to experience what is arguably one of the worst «natural» pains known to the
human race and instead of screaming, panting, or crying their way through it, they are able to experience pleasure?
I'm not Super
Woman but I am growing a
human being which
means I need to rest!
Women have been giving birth for as long as
humans have been on the planet, but that doesn't
mean it's easy and that doesn't
mean it's always intuitive!
That
means human babies are almost constant feeders by design — which is why
women in so many cultures literally wear their babies on their bodies, for easy access so they can feed often.
One external symptom that many
women forget to check on is that there is clearly two babies in the womb,
meaning that there are two
human hearts beating.
«That gays are dangerous to children is an obvious lie
meant to justify his violation of the
human rights of gay men and
women.
These encompass basic security for all — including the protection of
women against sexual violence...... that
means a military that is effective and respects
human rights...... it
means a police force that people run towards not away from...... and it
means a justice system that is fair, dependable and accessible to all who need it.
In Africa alone, the continent with the highest fertility rate and lowest use of modern contraceptives, 26 countries will double their population by 2050, according to the U.N. «Fundamentally if you're looking at World Population Day, it is at heart a
women's rights issue,» said Roger - Mark DeSouza director of population, environmental security and resilience at the non-partisan policy Wilson Center, based in Washington, D.C. World Population Day is
meant to draw attention to the challenges we face with a
human population that is constantly growing.
Vast inequities within and between countries
mean that the poorest, most disadvantaged
women, children, and adolescents often miss out on life - saving health services and experience serious violations of their
human rights.
«We believe that the Secretary of the Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) can clarify now whether adoption of the USPSTF recommendations would
mean that private insurers no longer have to cover mammograms for millions of
women 40 - 49 who, together with their doctor, choose to have regular mammograms and those 50 - 74 who choose to be screened annually.
So this language in effect
means alterations of embryonic cells can not be done in the United States if there is any intent to treat a
human being, including implantation of an altered embryo into a
woman's uterus.